Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The shot is not that impressive. If they used iron sights, it shows they at least are familiar with weapons handling. A 30.06 won't have any significant drop at that distance and is pretty much point-of-aim/point-of-impact. Pretty much you point at something and the bullet will go straight line distance.

If the rifle had a scope mounted, it definitely shows they know weapons to a point. With a scope, the weapon has to be zeroed and the scope must be leveled. Level isn't a big deal that close but not having it zeroed would be obvious. So either they just attached a scope on it (curious who makes that glass) and got lucky with it being somewhat sighted in, which is why Charlie caught one in the next instead, say the head or chest.

Or even scarier scenario is the shooter didn't understand the ballistics well enough and expected the round to 'climb' or hit higher due to the fact they were elevated. So they aimed at his neck expecting the round to climb up a mil and hit ole'charlie square in the head.

Either way, the shot is not that impressive but I think the shooter is familiar with firearms beyond just buying it at a store and blasting away for a box or two. So possibly ex-military or someone who's dad tried to stop them being a faggot and failed spectacularly.
 
Maybe late but interesting publication date on this amazon book.

URL can still be found by typing in the book title but the amazon link is dead. Author has no other works only 69 pages

Amazon doesn't let you back date so it's weird.

1757619467612.webp 1757619155802.webp
 
James Brown said:
except the posts would be from anonymous users on /pol/ or xitter meme accounts belonging to soyteens, not boomers and adults with their full public faces and friends lists visible. when you're publicly cheering the death of someone who's views align with 90% of average conservatives, and you're a teacher/nurse/doctor, people are going to fuck shit up for you irl. because no normal person wants to be operated on, or send their kids to school with, or even work in the same building as someone who thinks Charlie Kirk deserved to die for his beliefs.
Click to expand...
I think you vastly overestimate how many people give a shit about this stuff. Plenty of people work with others whom they don't approve of or who have detestable opinions. It's just avoided as to not rock the boat of social cohesion.
 
Will this FINALLY be enough to get the public to realize that the only sensible thing is exterminate troons and their enablers?

I unironically am advocating for TTD. They are mentally ill subhumans who are a threat to us all.
 
GlupShitto said:
The difference is that Rachel Maddow is a childless cow who deserves it. Charlie is a father and a good man.
Click to expand...
As flawed as he was, the man had a Catholic wife, two kids he spent time and loved (videos prove it 100%), improved his political and theological views over time and is a mildly generally positive model for young men to base themselves on. You can't say anything of that for the megajewdyke.

Heck, if your son went and told you "Dad, I want to be like Charlie Kirk!", you'd feel slightly bummed, but not sad or overly defeated; he was a pretty successful guy overall and also built his own family at least. A daughter claiming to want to be like Rachel Maddow is a family-destroying event.
 
I hate that every single assassination has to be a conspiracy. I'm at work and some guy is explaining how the cia was involved and Charlie Kirk is still alive. How hard is it to believe that In a country of like 350 million people with 400 million guns one of those people took one of those guns and killed someone they didn't fucking like?

It's not even a "misinformation" complaint. It's gay on its own merits.
 
Ted's Cabin said:
That's quite an assertion. Do you want to be a burger? If some leftist livestreamer was executed on camera in front of his family for his speech, I think the general reaction here would be "holy shit, that wasn't good." Nobody here likes Fuentes and most people realized the implications of a random gunman coming to his house to kill him.
Click to expand...
I’d hit the griddy if the turkroach, steve bonnell 2 or vaush got their heads ventilated by a .45, they’re part of the reason why Kirk got popped & a tranny shot up a bunch of Catholic kids. They’ve been calling for violence & fedposting on stream for years, whereas all Kirk did was accept shekels from israel & point out that trannies with guns are a terrible idea
 
mold said:
is this opposite world franco? he couldn't even move himself or his troops around, if that english pilot hadn't decided to fly him into Morocco from the canaries and if mussolini hadn't lent him tons of stuff spain would be speaking russian today
Click to expand...
No, just regular old Franco who managed to keep the Nationalists from infighting & purity-spiraling into irrelevance between the Falangists, Carlists, Alfonsine monarchists and regular conservatives (something neither Kolchak nor his own Republican rivals managed with their shambolic coalitions), won the war in the end and established a durable dictatorship that managed a successful pivot from failed autarkic policies to a more proper capitalism which allowed the Spanish economy to boom after the ruinous civil war. So the fuck what if he needed an assist early on, the same was true of his enemies, what mattered the most was that he prevailed. If anything his biggest fault wasn't anything to do with the war itself but with not killing enough commies to prevent Spain from ever sliding back into socialism after his death, which is where Suharto has him beat.
 
Bixby Snyder said:
The shot is not that impressive. If they used iron sights, it shows they at least are familiar with weapons handling. A 30.06 won't have any significant drop at that distance and is pretty much point-of-aim/point-of-impact. Pretty much you point at something and the bullet will go straight line distance.

If the rifle had a scope mounted, it definitely shows they know weapons to a point. With a scope, the weapon has to be zeroed and the scope must be leveled. Level isn't a big deal that close but not having it zeroed would be obvious. So either they just attached a scope on it (curious who makes that glass) and got lucky with it being somewhat sighted in, which is why Charlie caught one in the next instead, say the head or chest.

Or even scarier scenario is the shooter didn't understand the ballistics well enough and expected the round to 'climb' or hit higher due to the fact they were elevated. So they aimed at his neck expecting the round to climb up a mil and hit ole'charlie square in the head.

Either way, the shot is not that impressive but I think the shooter is familiar with firearms beyond just buying it at a store and blasting away for a box or two. So possibly ex-military or someone who's dad tried to stop them being a faggot and failed spspectacularly.
Click to expand...
People really overestimate how hard it is to hit a person sized target at 100~200 yards. Anyone who shoots would be able to, it's only hard if you're trying to get an actual group which shrinks the target area down to a few inches.

Shows how many people just shoot 25 yards at an indoor range and probably still can't get a decent group or are just morons and think guns are somehow super complicated to operate and use.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom