Yes. We shouldn't have to ask this question.
I've already mentioned this but it bears repeating: 2026 and 2028 will unquestionably be blue waves and anyone who tells you otherwise is lying.
Fatpacks is right. Just look how uncomfortable you guys get whenever those nasty chuds breach containment on the hugbox. It's bad enough when
this thread gets featured, but we can at least piss ourselves to mark our territory and drive off HHH. But then you screech about those awful leftoids not being sad Charlie Kirk is dead in the "Charlie Kirk's throat disappeared" thread. Newsflash, they're happy. Newsflash, Trump's landslide victory was about a point in the popular vote. Newsflash, no one in history has ever gotten more votes for president of the US than Joseph Biden in 2020, and it's not even close. "But he cheated, not that many people actually like him!" Great, I'm sure you're bringing that up because
you're going to do something about it, pussy. No?
Look, the left are winning, big. They killed some Christian kids, and the mother was a Catholic squish who supported her daughter's transition. Or do I mean her son's? Who knows, it keeps happening! Try and import more whites, a nigger will just murder them. There exists a whole infrastructure with tendrils in every part of government,
especially boring local government, to ensure that that nigger will still be walking the streets. Except not this time, Trump took notice,
this nigger is getting locked up! Until the next time a Democrat is in the white house I guess...but still, we got
exactly one murderous nigger off the streets, mission accomplished!
Do you think people should be upset about the state of affairs? Well those tendrils include the whole media apparatus. The question after Kirk was fucking murdered in public wasn't "why are they murdering Republicans? what's gone wrong?" it was "how worried should we be that Republicans calling out the dehumanizing and murderous rhetoric from Democrats might spark retaliation against Democrats?" Literally, by the way. That's a news clip I saw.
But anyway, no, Democrats are not sorry, and they're not sad about Charlie Kirk. Honestly with some of what I've been hearing, I'd like to believe some people are confusing him with Crowder who had a similar schtick at times, but who would not be leaving behind a wife who is sad he died. But no, Charlie just went and talked to them and had a different point of view, and that's inflammatory and worthy of death. He's a maga troll. That's his literal job title, you'll be reading it in the New York Times tomorrow.
The other thing I see that I just do not get is people calling him a grifter. I think part of it is that it gives "moderates" a nice "moderate" take to shit out, "he was a grifter, but he didn't deserve that, I feel bad for his kids." But ok, so his job was politics, he made a living off this. He was also a big part of the Republican ground game. He was getting young people registered to vote. So yeah, Democrats should be happy he's dead, because now someone else is gonna have to do it. And you know what? It's gonna suck. You're going to have to watch a man with a retarded haircut dance to shitty hiphop on their phones and tell them "actually the beat is kind of fire though" and keep the gun out of your mouth long enough to walk them through filling out paperwork. Charlie Kirk would talk to these
retards youngsters, so they killed him. Don't worry though, you don't have to put in the work; I'm sure when the time comes, they'll kill you too for free!
Whatever, while I'm venting: no, JD Vance does not read this retarded thread, and he's certainly not posting here. No, this thread is not the vital pulse of public opinion, or even the opinions of farmers. No, we do not win forever for free by letting ugly people kill us. We win by winning.
