Charlie Kirk shot and killed at Utah event, no arrest yet

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.

NEW DISCUSSION THREAD




article/archive

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah on Wednesday.

Bystanders report seeing Kirk shot near his neck during a Q&A with students.

A suspect is in custody, according to a UVU alert sent to students. The campus is on lockdown.



Charlie Kirk has allegedly been shot in the neck during a Utah Valley University event. Retrieving links now.
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1965843808475820324
IMG_20250910_124732_275.webp
Confirmation he was at the event.

Multiple witnesses confirmed he was shot "in the neck".
https://x.com/HeyRonWilson/status/1965846857298628717
IMG_20250910_124854_979.webp
https://x.com/pdubdev/status/1965844906364252411
IMG_20250910_124857_953.webp

Video after shots were fired.



Up close videos of Charlie getting shot. Do not watch if sensitive. It is disturbing.




Video of Charlie being evacuated.

Multiple reports currently say Charlie Kirk made it to the hospital and is currently stable but the extent of his injuries and likelihood of recovery isn't currently known. He is in critical condition.

Charlie Kirk has been assassinated. Trump has confirmed he's dead.
https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1965878289198887177
IMG_20250910_144547_201.webp

The pictures of the detained boomer are not the shooter. The murderer is still at large.
https://x.com/TheInsiderPaper/status/1965868724608778639
Screenshot_20250910_153045_X.webp
Police scanner with possible description.
Here is the dispatch / scanner reporting of a possible shooter and his description.

Sorry I messed it up but here it is.

fgsdbsfgb.mp4

Kash Patel says suspect now in custody.
IMG_20250910_163301_032.webp

Released. Suspect still at large.
1757549191369.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Almost all my coworkers, even the lefty ones, are shocked by this and absolutely detest it. Except one, who said he didn't care he died, which is fine if you didn't know the guy, but he follows up with "Well he probably shouldn't have said such hateful things.", which throws that out the window. Which several of us told that it isn't right and it's a rotten way to die, shit opinions or no. I even told him that he's not even that controversial of a figure. Dude then said "Yeah I should probably talk to my therapist about that." But then said Charlie said something about crisis actors? I don't know.

If this dude knew my opinions at all he would wish death on me and that makes me feel a certain way. It's strange how common this is now, and this guy is an open commie. I always try to give people the benefit of a doubt, but these last few years it's been proven time and time again I shouldn't.
 
Whatcha mean? I think this will be one of those things where the big important left and right people go, ok this ends now. And arrests start
The right, despite being "big tent," is constantly at odds to excise fringe elements and is forced to denounce things they have no part in, nor share interest in from fringe right-wing lunatics. Examples of violence, despite how fringe, are used for years to great effect, i.e. autistic kid in a super car confronted by a mob after having a gun pointed at him and proceeding to act autistic. Thats why these leftist faggots put fences around words and pronouns and microaggressions as a way of tone policing and argument management; if they feared real retribution, security is more important than dictating retarded confrontations about minutia.

The modern left is self-consuming and self purging due to its purity tests and power hungry-as-its-own-reward nature, and is teeming with people openly wanting violence against their political enemies with no motivation to disassociate from radical elements and leaving it to the media and the gold fish memory of the common man to forget about their own short comings.

You ask run of the mill rightwingers when the right goes to far, you'll get a huge array of issues and concessions.

You ask a leftist what are examples of the left going to far and you'll be kicked out of your friend group/fired.

Until recently, that is, as the pendulum swings. It's coming back. Hard. I didn't want it for a lot of my life, but I will live with my "privilege," I suppose.
 
Last edited:
Doxing is the start, they will be fired, and they will be turned into fucking pariahs.
They set the conditions.

Fuck them, war.
Niggers, I know your accounts are older than mine, but I know internet tough guy talk when I see it.

You're letting his death wrangle to saying something dumb at best to retards who don't matter, and doing something retarded at worst.
 
Did you feel this way about the Minnesota law makers who were shot in June? Thunderdomers were cheering it on
I condemned the assassination of the Minnesota lawmakers, but if I'm being honest, I didn't know who they were, so it affected me less. Charlie Kirk was a national figure that I recognized, so it got my attention, but to answer your question, "grave dancing," whether Republican or Democrat, is wrong. No "whataboutism" makes celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder acceptable.
 
why the fuck a someone shooting an activist rather than the actual fucking government officials who are diddling kids??
Even if you don’t agree with his politics there are worse fucking actors that actually run the that shithole country. People want change and then pussy out and kill someone that changes nothing.
They say they want change and then shoot people that literally have nothing to do with the government other than a few visits to the White House, if that is the case.

I don't care that Charlie Kirk and his supporters had said some vile shit, his words aren't as powerful as a bullet. This mentality is the reason we are here in the first place. As much as I despise Hasan's opinions (and the majority of what the left has said), I don't want to see him killed because he is a stupid faggot, even if he has called for violence or supported terrorism.
 
Feel bad for his kids, I hope they weren't there. That said, tinfoil hat time. It strikes me as something out of a movie script that he was talking about trans shooters when he was shot. As much as I despise the overuse of WW2 references, was this a Reichstag?
 
That's literally the same thing? People committed to asylums wouldn't be allowed to purchase firearms.
The prevention of owning firearms sets a different precedent.
Whoever it was was either a very practiced marksman or had military training. One shot. At that distance, with planning, he also figured he could get away from the scene undetected. Be curious how much security footage they will pull to review. He might have been really familiar with the building, security and how to exit without being captured on video. He obviously knew how waltz out without attracting suspicion. The panic and confusion after these events gave him good cover.
I know nothing of guns, but those who do say this is not a very difficult shot and not indicative of some skilled sniper.
 
Now how do we know this won't end up like that time Reddit got the Boston Marathon bomber's identity wrong?
The disinformation in this thread is wild. Kash Patel's embarrassing tweet revealing the FBI has no idea how to conduct any sort of real investigation into this isn't even included in the main news announcement (there is some random news organization and twitter account announcing it instead). Niggas need to stop being dumb
 
I thought the general consensus was that ideological differences should be settled intellectually.

No, liberals believe that the disagreement over what means you should be allowed to have to defend yourself should be resolved by literally murdering you. This was established during the BLM riots, where they argued that Kylre Rittenhouse should have had a legal obligation to let antifa thugs literally beat him to death.

Now they've punctuated that by murdering Charlie Kirk and saying that this was actually an entirely just thing, since he believes in our ancient tradition, dating to the Rights of Englishmen, of the right to self-defense, and such belief can only be dealt with via homicide.

Leftists believe in murder of political opponents. It's their core value.
 
This opinion has probably been stated before in this thread, but I don't really have time to check, sorry.

I'd like to point out something. Kirk was, all things considered, a moderate. He promoted values which are rarer and rarer these days in this age of harsh polarization: civil discussion, reaching out to the other side and a respect for the democratic process as a solution to the nation's issues. Most importantly, he was a voice of influence coming from the youth - a demographic that is growing angrier and angrier at their falling quality of life and the broken system which kicked them to the curb and left them to die. You may call him a counterweight to people like Spic Fuentes, who is able to survive precisely because he is able to reach out to the newest politically active generation, even if it's only for the purpose of turning them into seething faggots.

Charlie promoted compromise and the idea of maintaining a healthy democracy to millions. Plenty of more normal, moderately right-wing people share at least some of the views he had thanks to his work. And for having these values, Kirk was murdered in front of a crowd of hundreds of people, his table of debate stained with his own blood. The message is clear: you can believe in the power of peaceful discussion all you want, but if you are anywhere close to right-wing, you will be a target of violence. The left has openly admitted as such for years. This is simply that theory put to practice.

Only a few days ago, a White Ukrainian refugee was stabbed by a feral nog on a train. She sobbed and bled out as the nog said, quote, "I got that white girl." That act of brazenly racial terrorism kicked a new wave of radicalization in the American Right into high gear, one which has rapidly led to things that were verboten even two years ago entering into the public discourse. Fox News, the most mainstream conservative outlet in the country, is showing racial statistics. Matt Walsh is calling for the heads of judges and DAs. "Niggers" was straight up trending on X. People are awakening.

And now, while tensions are high, a man with a loving family and naive yet pure ideals who championed the cause of peaceful politics has been brutally and publicly executed. What do you think the moderate right is going to do when their figures calling for compromise and moderation are shot in broad daylight? The answer is pretty simple: they stop treating the other side as a "misguided bunch" and start treating them like the enemies they actually are. Whoever shot him saw a raging fire and decided the best course of action was to drive a truck full of gasoline into it. There is no going back from this. The line set by the assassination attempt on Trump has stretched further to simple influencers. People on the moderate right will know, instinctively, that they themselves are next. And that fact will change them. They may stop believing in the idea of any peace and compromise and believe the only solution to the woes of the nation is not a political one.

The Right has a new martyr. Charlie Kirk's death brought America closer to the "fascist state" the Left fears more than anything Charlie Kirk did while he was alive. That is why they are the stupidest and most evil people the world has ever seen and that is why they will not be prepared for what is coming. And it is totally and entirely their fault.
Very well said. I'd like to think that Charlie Kirk goes on to become an MLK type figure in a sense for the right, I have a feeling in my gut we are going to be hearing the name Charlie Kirk for a long time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom