US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah it wasn't a problem when hippy fags were constantly shutting down actually useful nuclear energy was it? Suffah greentards.
They use green energy to power the oilfields. Climate change is and always has been a lie to steal your money and freedom. Remember when eu tried t pass bills that would force its citizens to not eat steak and drive cares whilst the politicians could do whatever they wanted. Also funny how they never went after china they have far more coal plants than the us and yet it was always the west that had to change. Weird. Eh nowadays no one cares about climate change they more worried about Palestine or trans. But aT least we got a few videos of breadtubers making themselves look stupid, isn’t that tight hbomberguy
 
I hate to powerlevel, but I assure you that hosting a 'lesbian oil-wrestling party' at your house is not the erotic scene I presume heterosexual men indulge in. Admittedly I'm not sure any East Asians attended.
 
I hate to powerlevel, but I assure you that hosting a 'lesbian oil-wrestling party' at your house is not the erotic scene I presume heterosexual men indulge in. Admittedly I'm not sure any East Asians attended.
Depends. Are we talking lesbians or "lesbians"? Because the last oil wrestling party I went to years ago was great.
 
Walter said the plaintiffs had not proven Jackson “had actual authority to speak on the State’s behalf,” and thus didn’t have the right to sue over constitutional rights violations.
How is this different than the Trump case? The standard isn't if they have authority to speak on the State's behalf, but if they are using the account as part of official business as an elected representative and otherwise allow the public to comment on their posts.

The direct comparison and justification for the initial Trump ruling is that social media accounts that allow public comment act in a similar role as a politician's office where people are allowed to go and make their voices heard.

Most politician's offices allow you to drop off letters or call them as a constituent. What politicians are not allowed to do is limit this based on political opinion or basically anything else. They are additionally not allowed to rent some private office and treat it like a public office with the exception of keeping out the undesirables. The inclusion of private offices treated as a proxy for their public one's was the justification for expanding the restriction to non-offical government accounts. I don't see how this case is any different.
 
Depends. Are we talking lesbians or "lesbians"? Because the last oil wrestling party I went to years ago was great.
Actual honest to God dykes - I apologize if my use of quotes caused confusion, but this was not a party for the dreaded 'male gaze.'

Why the fuck would you host something like that at YOUR house?
Renting in a multi-unit home. The main festivities were the other apartment. I was invited to the proceedings, which spilled outside into the lawn/porch anyway,
 
Last edited:
I trust polls when they are transparent about their data and methods. If I have to do some digging to figure out how you conducted your poll, then I automatically assume it's bullshit. Organizations like Pew explain everything right there on the page, so I find them far more trustworthy.
 
I don't believe this will pan out. Putin has broken these agreements in the past because he knows the United States and European Union will fight over who has to resolve issues, which means whoever gets saddled with the responsibility drags their feet. Trump's idea to make Ukraine leverage its existence by allowing western and Russian minerals mining was a good idea, but Zelstinky's pride couldn't handle it. So now we get to watch Russia do the same thing it's done for centuries and bully its immediate neighbors.
 
View attachment 7801596
Get ready for a market correction as the AI bubble pops. One of my predictions down, two to go.
Zerohedge is misquoting the NYT article (archive):
On Tuesday, Meta is expected to announce that it will split its A.I. division — which is known as Meta Superintelligence Labs — into four groups, two people with knowledge of the plans said. One will focus on A.I. research; one on a potentially powerful A.I. called “superintelligence”; another on products; and one on infrastructure such as data centers and other A.I. hardware, they said.

The reorganization is likely to be the final one for some time, the people said. The moves are aimed at better organizing Meta so it can get to its goal of superintelligence and develop A.I. products more quickly to compete with others, the people said.

Some A.I. executives are expected to leave, the people said. Meta is also looking at downsizing the A.I. division overall — which could include eliminating roles or moving employees to other parts of the company — because it has grown to thousands of people in recent years, the people said. Discussions remain fluid and no final decisions have been made, they said.
As Meta has spent billions to bring in A.I. talent, some members of the old guard have chafed at the new hires, three people with knowledge of the matter said.

In July, Meta named Shengjia Zhao, an OpenAI researcher and co-creator of its ChatGPT chatbot, as its chief A.I. scientist. In recent weeks, Mr. Zhao has had a line of Meta’s old A.I. researchers and employees outside his office, where he has questioned them about their past work while interviewing them for new roles, one person said.
Sounds like they're getting rid of their old AI team and replacing them with a new, much more highly paid team made up of people they poached from other AI companies.
 
Very interesting for Republicans to be falling apart as the Democrats go through the biggest morale boost in recent history.

Do not underestimate Newsom, he is a much stronger candidate than I think any of you realize.
I will never underestimate retardation ever again, believe me.
 
Back
Top Bottom