It all depends on who Fatpacks says will win, always bet on the opposite.
It's pretty amazing that Trump has basically managed to build a growing legion of brownshirts loyal to him and the country, an they're happy to say so.
Beyond the standard arrogance they display (they all have that same "I WANT YOUR BADGE NUMBER!" trait every other nigger and Karen who ever gets arrested has), you can hear the terror in their voices. They're asking a couple of very important rhetorical questions -- namely "so you don't have to identify yourselves?" and "is this even legal?" and "is this due process?" -- and it scares the actual living shit out of them that the answer to all three questions is "yes."
B-BUT THE LAWYER ON YOUTUBE SAID--
I just would like to point out that people have this grave misunderstanding that officers have to identify themselves at all times. Not only is that not true but ICE is under the jurisdiction of the department of homeland security, the regulations and laws of DHS does not require a federal DHS agent to identify themselves for any reason at all, its why ICE can do stuff that not even the FBI would be allowed to do like concealing their identity when not undercover.
lol the funny part is I've heard cops tell people to stop getting legal advice from TikTok and Youtube when they express horror at their magic incantations failing to free them from arrest. It almost always shuts them up.
Indeed! Ironically, the right time to protest this kind of "gestapo"-style law enforcement would have been at the passing of the Patriot Act that brought DHS into existence in the first place. In fact, I recall being part of those protests (back when Bush Jr. was still enforcing those delightful "free speech zones" with fences and signs with arrows and such) and this was one of my biggest concerns. Oddly enough, the government itself was more polite about my objections than my peers. The worst Bush Jr. and friends did was shoo us into fenced-in "free speech zones," while peers and colleagues mocked us for being "paranoid" and "worried over nothing."
They actually should but they dont have to, and the issue is if they dont ANY good defense attorney is going to use that to throw away the case before it even makes it to court. There's a reason it exists and when cops don't do it 90% of the time the defense is able to get the case thrown out or get any and all statements made during said time thrown out.
Seeing this happen across so many faces for so many reasons these last 8 months... I'm only being about 73% hyperbolic when I say the feeling it gives me is similar to cumming.
I cannot imagine being this retarded. If you're so scared of the cops "infringing on rights" and want to record their "crime", why would you be borderline harassing them, making enemies for yourself for no gain? Why not record them covertly or from a distance where you're safe?
Current strat is to run infinite 'brown person crying' articles to sway women's opinions, but if they can't do anything about it they just look impotent.
Not anymore. The latest case I can find on the subject that supports my position
is Howes v. Fields (2012), where SCOTUS ruled "Imprisonment alone is not enough to create a custodial situation within the meaning of Miranda." Simply being arrested isn't enough to invoke the rule -- until you begin an interrogation (i.e. asking potentially incriminating questions), you don't need to read the warning.
This makes me think of some soverign citizen videos.
At issue in those cases is if the person was questioned or "felt coerced" into making a statement. Otherwise, any statements made would be voluntary and Miranda not apply.
What bombers? Russia doesn't have a bomber fleet anymore.
I have it on good authority that Bob Saget raped and murdered a girl in 1990
Those are the best. It really is like "magic" to them, and they just get increasingly desperate as the incantations don't dispel policio detainesto immediately. All that's missing is the wand. It's even funnier when they're actually stupid enough to take it in front of a judge. The courts have gotten so much better in recent years at dealing with this retardation that each judge has a unique reaction to it and their own "spin" on deflating the arguments (and fucking with the asshole who's wasting his time).
Yeah I remember there was a real chef kiss one, where the guy had a video of him "Destroying" the judge by doing the whole "Freeman on the land! That gold fringed flag means this is an ADMIRALTY COURT! I don't recognize your jurisdiction over me as person, you only have power over the corporation created with my name against my will by the govenrment" and walking out.
Trump using his genius showman talents for the benefit of all.
I was one of the first few hundred subscribers to Ryan McBeth back when he was a C# Programming channel. The war gave him 1 million subs.
Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Carrot in stick, do what they want and you'll get funded, don't and we'll fund someone to primary you.
They haven't tried taking islands a few km away from Fujian.
That's when they were united with the Ukrainians.
I think that's basically correct, except for Germany/France. Europe, because of the EU and their reliance on the US for security, aren't quite there. They could be, but they'd have to divorce themselves from the US in terms of security first. Israel is actually the GAE's watchdog against Turkey and Iran to keep Oil flowing from the gulf states and to keep the Suez open, but in true Jewish fashion, they're a difficult vassal, who's been allowed to top from the bottom a bit. It's all about the petrodollar.
Tucker had a guy on talkign about that, he put forth the idea that they were just still in shock that trump won and trump was putting all these "disruptors" in positions of power. Like Kash, a guy that had been on the opposite side with the FBI fuckign with him. Tulsi in charge of DNI when they were fuckign with her. Trump has them shook, and he's taken advantage as much as he can when their pants are down.
