Dave Brian Muscato / Danielle Tatiana Muscato / Danielle Brian Muscato - Half-Assed Trans Activist, Fully Arrested, Rape Appropriator, Convicted of Stalking His Parents

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Crocodylus Acutus said:
View attachment 7779610
A jury of 12 has unanimously determined Dave Muscato to be GUILTY on both counts of harassment :woo:
Click to expand...
12 you say...
1755202137619.webp
 
moocow said:
Wait 'til sentencing before you dance too much.
Click to expand...
It won't be much, but keep in mind these are felony convictions. That isn't nothing. Dave is a on-violent offender with a history of petty drug crime. Hopefully he get's a bit extra for forcing this to trial. He even went through all this to pussy out and half ass it. He'll chafe at the probation requirements and according to a quick jewgle, a judge can still make weed a banned substance in MO even if the individual has a medical marijuana card.
 
Crocodylus Acutus said:
View attachment 7779610
A jury of 12 has unanimously determined Dave Muscato to be GUILTY on both counts of harassment :woo:
Click to expand...

@Null

This is feature worthy.

Dave Muscato, the totally "true honestly I would transition if I could but I can't" troon is found guilty of harassing his parents.

I won't get to excited as it''s a minor crime so he will probably just get a light slap but damn this will feed his persecution complex so hard. He will definitely break the incoming restraining order within 30 days. There is no chance he will be able to stay away from harassing his parents.

much thanks @Crocodylus Acutus your a now part of the official Muscato Crime family for your services.

edit: I'm late and gay...again. Disregard
 
Last edited:
skirtgospinny said:
View attachment 7779680
Click to expand...
I'm so excited for the upcoming cope sesh. We were DENIED his brilliant testimony, but at least now we get screeds about how his lawyer was actually part of the conspiracy all along and if only he had gone on that stand he could have turned it all around and put Dr. Joe in jail like he belongs! Just like Russell Greer blaming his lawyer when if only he had told the judge his plights instead he wouldn't have been convicted.

@Crocodylus Acutus Semper Fi for your service. :semperfidelis:
 
Featured on Aug 14, 2025 by Null: Dave Muscato has been found GUILTY of two counts of criminal harassment after engaging in a years-long smear campaign against his own father for not letting him be a freeloader.
Plum Smuggler said:
As an aside. How do you make those cool quote posts on that section?
Click to expand...
[EMBED content="post-<post id>"]<post url>[/EMBED]
like so
an example using your post would be
[EMBED content="post-22247803"]https://kiwifarms.net/threads/dave-brian-muscato-danielle-tatiana-muscato-danielle-brian-muscato.20281/post-22247803[/EMBED]
Plum Smuggler

Post in thread 'Dave Brian Muscato / Danielle Tatiana Muscato / Danielle Brian Muscato'

It's already posted to the community feature section.

As an aside. How do you make those cool quote posts on that section?
Screenshot 2025-08-14 2.33.27 PM.webp
Reactions:Like x 8 Thunk-Provoking x 1
 
Plum Smuggler said:
As an aside. How do you make those cool quote posts on that section?
View attachment 7779710
Click to expand...
They are generated automatically when you paste a link to the post. For example to quote your post like that, I would find the link, which is:
Code: 
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/dave-brian-muscato-danielle-tatiana-muscato-danielle-brian-muscato.20281/post-22247803
Then paste it as is (without clicking any buttons):
Plum Smuggler

Post in thread 'Dave Brian Muscato / Danielle Tatiana Muscato / Danielle Brian Muscato'

It's already posted to the community feature section.

As an aside. How do you make those cool quote posts on that section?
Screenshot 2025-08-14 2.33.27 PM.webp
Reactions:Like x 8 Thunk-Provoking x 1
 
Markass the Worst said:
They are generated automatically when you paste a link to the post. For example to quote your post like that, I would find the link, which is:
Code: 
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/dave-brian-muscato-danielle-tatiana-muscato-danielle-brian-muscato.20281/post-22247803
Then paste it as is (without clicking any buttons):
Plum Smuggler

Post in thread 'Dave Brian Muscato / Danielle Tatiana Muscato / Danielle Brian Muscato'

It's already posted to the community feature section.

As an aside. How do you make those cool quote posts on that section?
Screenshot 2025-08-14 2.33.27 PM.webp
Reactions:Like x 8 Thunk-Provoking x 1
Click to expand...
oh neat i didn't realize it did it automatically now. i've been doing it the old way for months.
 
broken chiyron said:
I think it'll be this, or that his lawyer talked him out of testifying so he never got to give his side of the story. Refusing to testify doesn't seem like a decision Dave would make given how delusionally he views himself. Betting his attorney begged him not to take the stand.
Click to expand...

Maybe those depositions he couldn't get taken because he didn't have the money until right before the trial, and though he asked for a delay to take the depositions, the judge said no.

He might argue that indigents or people living near the poverty line - whatever category he can squeeze his fat ass into - have to be given adequate resources by the state to mount an adequate defense and he was denied that.
 
break these cuffs said:
according to a quick jewgle, a judge can still make weed a banned substance in MO even if the individual has a medical marijuana card.
Click to expand...
The state Constitution says otherwise if you have a med card, but probation and parole have sore pussies over the whole thing so currently in some counties they are trying to say it violates federal law and therefore your general condition to remain law-abiding. It's obviously bullshit when you look at the wording of the laws, but the court of appeals punted and dismissed the most recent challenge on purely procedural grounds.
 
Here are my notes for the second day:

8:15 a.m.
  • Time for the trial to resume.
8:25 a.m.
  • Court goes back on record, but the jury is still not present.
  • Defense submits a motion. It is denied. Idk what the motion was in particular, because the defense did not state it out loud.
  • Dave REFUSES to testify.
8:30 a.m.
  • Jury enters the room.
  • The state says that it will rest its case.
  • Defense calls in a witness.
8:35 a.m.
First witness: Brandon Bayton (the defense didn't have him spell his last name, so I just wrote it how its pronounced)
  • The police officer that took Mary's report after the dentist incident.
  • He seems a little nervous; he is fidgeting around a bit.
  • He reads his report, wherein he confirms that Mary did in fact tell him that Dave said her and Joe possessed child pornography.
  • The defense only questions about the CP part, he doesn't ask much else. The APA does not cross-examine him.
Second witness: I can't remember her name, but it doesn't matter because...
  • The second witness that the defense called in was not present.
  • The judge called for a sidebar and then for a recess for about 10-15 minutes to wait for the witness to arrive.
8:55 a.m.
  • The witness never arrives.
  • Defense says they'll rest their case.
  • Defense files a motion for judgement of acquittal of all evidence. It is denied.
9:05 a.m.
  • The jury returns
  • Judge gives the jury instructions concerning the two charges for deliberation
9:15 a.m.
Closing Arguments:

The assistant prosecuting attorney goes first:
  • "Danielle was lying in wait- she had a mission" in reference to exhibit 4 (the police interview). She then replays exhibit 4 for the court.
  • "Danielle wanted 100K from her parents, one way or another." The 10K was just a portion of the cash that Dave wanted to steal from his parents.
  • "Mary was held hostage in her car, unable to get out."
    • I notice Dave smirk when the APA said this line.
  • She says Dave caused emotional distress
  • I noticed Dowling (defense attorney) making some faces and raising his eyebrows at the APA's closer while she spoke.
  • She says that Dave did not have good cause to do what he did.
  • "There's no debate as to what happened."
  • "The goal of that was harassment. The goal of that was not to reconcile, not to help Mary" In reference to the first harassment event.
  • "We have in her own words what her purpose was" referring to exhibit 4.
Defense goes next:
  • He thanked the jury and told them how important their duty is. Just a bit of brown-nosing.
  • The defense then quoted George Washington: "For if Men are to be precluded from offering their Sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter. "
  • He argues that freedom of speech is a core issue in the trial
    • "Is this case just about Mary's distress? No"
  • Argues that Mary walked past Dave in the first incident in order to go with Joe. This somehow mitigates the harassment.
  • He also argues that Mary's face looked upset after Dave berated her for over 20 minutes. This also somehow mitigates the harassment because she was angry.
  • In reference to Dave's child abuse claims: "Are Danielle's claims against them valid? We don't know."
  • "The prosecutor charged Danielle with harassment, but that's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole."
  • The defense essentially says it is "Dave's right to shout" that Joe is an abuser "from the rooftops."
  • Defense argues that Dave wanting Joe to bring 10K to their meeting was a sign of good faith, not a threat.
  • Because Dave told Mary 7 times that he "wasn't trying to make her feel bad," then it is not harassment.
  • He points out the fact that Dave threatened Mary with child abuse not child porn, so its okay.
  • He brings up her hearing issues again, and says that Mary just misunderstood Dave.
  • "This is her one day in court, this is Danielle's one shot at justice." :story:
The APA's rebuttal:
  • "I won't talk about George Washington."
  • "The child abuse is a red herring."
  • "We are here because of Danielle's actions to follow her parents." In other words, Dave is a stalker child :tomlinson:
  • "Saying 'I'm not trying to make you feel bad' does not mitigate guilt."
9:50 a.m.
  • The marshal leads the jury away to deliberate
2:00 p.m.
After about 4 hours of deliberation, the jury returns a verdict of GUILTY on both charges of harassment. Every juror says they voted guilty on both counts when the judge asks them individually if this is their verdict.
 
Crocodylus Acutus said:
9:50 a.m.
  • The marshal leads the jury away to deliberate
2:00 p.m.
After about 4 hours of deliberation, the jury returns a verdict of GUILTY on both charges of harassment. Every juror says they voted guilty on both counts when the judge asks them individually if this is their verdict
Click to expand...
Ah, they wanted to justify their free sandwich - many such cases.
 
I would imagine this guarantees the TRO that got extended by the civil court before the trial will be turned into a PRO now.
 
break these cuffs said:
It won't be much, but keep in mind these are felony convictions.
Click to expand...
I wonder if this will have any effect on his housing voucher.... Perhaps they can bring a punishment suitable for ladies from quality homes -- a trip out to the country with enforced rest, no inflammatory novels, cold baths, thin broth, and yellow wallpaper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom