Opinion A Right-Wing Influencer Tried to Be a Tradwife. It Almost Broke Her. - Despite the presence of a few high-profile women in Trump’s administration, the right is increasingly trying to drive women out of public life.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/11/opinion/lauren-southern-tradwife-maga.html
https://archive.is/0X7N3
IMG_4934.webp
Lauren Southern, one of the most well-known right-wing influencers during Donald Trump’s first term, first went viral with a 2015 video titled “Why I Am Not a Feminist.” Then 19, beautiful and blond, Southern argued that women are advantaged in many areas of life, including child custody disputes and escaping abusive relationships. “Feminists are unintentionally creating a world of reverse sexism that I don’t want to be a part of,” she said.

But being an antifeminist, it turns out, is no shield against abusive male power. Southern’s new self-published memoir, “This Is Not Real Life,” is the story of conservative ideology colliding with reality. It’s made headlines for her claim that Andrew Tate, an unrepentant online misogynist accused of human trafficking, sexually assaulted her in Romania in 2018. (Tate has denied this.) The book is particularly revealing, though, for its depiction of Southern’s painful attempts to contort herself into an archetypical tradwife, an effort that left her almost suicidal. Her story should be a cautionary tale for the young women who aspire to the domestic life she once evangelized for.

Despite the presence of a few high-profile women in Trump’s administration, the right is increasingly trying to drive women out of public life. Some of this push comes from the unabashed patriarchs atop the Republican Party; last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reposted a video in which leaders of his Christian denomination said that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote. (“All of Christ for All of Life,” wrote Hegseth.)
But there are also female influencers who present housewifery as the ultimate in wellness, an escape from the soulless grind of the workplace. “Less Prozac, more protein,” the podcast host Alex Clark told thousands of listeners at a conservative women’s conference in June. “Less burnout, more babies, less feminism, more femininity.” (Clark is unmarried and has no children.)
IMG_4935.webp
This Instagram-inflected traditionalism is taking hold at a time when the workplace is becoming even less friendly to women. As The Washington Post reported on Monday, large numbers of mothers have left the work force this year. Many have been driven out by return-to-office mandates and a backlash against diversity policies that’s led to hostile working environments. But some, according to The Post, “say they are giving up jobs happily, in line with MAGA culture and the rise of the ‘traditional wife.’”

Southern had more reason than most to want to retreat into the cult of domesticity. As she recounts in her memoir, her antifeminist video helped propel her to international notoriety, and soon she was traveling the world as an avatar of irreverent online reaction. She gave out fliers saying, “Allah is a Gay God” in a Muslim neighborhood in England, popularized the idea that there’s a white genocide in South Africa and interviewed the reactionary philosopher Alexander Dugin on a trip to Moscow seemingly arranged by shadowy Russian interests.

It was during this phase of her life that she said she was assaulted by Tate, who was just beginning to build his global brand. Her politics made the trauma particularly hard to process. “It wouldn’t be very helpful to ‘the cause’ (or my career, for that matter) for me to become exactly what I criticized,” wrote Southern. “A victim.”

After her encounter with Tate, she wrote, her life “unraveled.” She yearned to escape her own infamy and the need to keep shoveling more outrageous content into the internet’s insatiable maw. So when she met a man who wanted to settle down, she jumped at the chance to give up her career and become a stay-at-home wife and mother. She posted photos of herself baking, and “selfies in the mirror showing how quickly I had bounced back to fitness and health after pregnancy.”

But in reality, she wrote, her life was “hell.” She’d moved with her husband from Canada, where she’d grown up, to his native Australia, where she lived in near-total isolation. Her husband treated her with growing contempt, which she responded to by trying to be an even better wife. “I threw myself tenfold into trying to be the perfect partner: cooking, cleaning, putting on dresses and high heels to welcome him home,” she wrote. But it didn’t work; she said her husband berated her, stayed out until late at night and constantly threatened to divorce her if she didn’t obey him.
IMG_4937.webp
Eventually, she wrote, when she defied him by traveling to Canada to visit her family, he told her the marriage was over. By then, she said, she’d turned over much of her savings to him. She and her son had to move in with her parents, and then into a small, cheap cabin in the woods. She was destitute, full of shame and intellectually adrift. As she told the conservative journalist Mary Harrington last year, when she first went public about her experience with trad life, “My brain was breaking between two worlds, because I couldn’t let go of the ideology.”

Southern’s book is not an attempt at liberal redemption. Though she claims she’s lost interest in politics, she doesn’t renounce the ugly nativist views that helped her build her audience. She doesn’t apologize for, say, trying to block a boat that rescued drowning migrants in the Mediterranean. But while she’s not a particularly sympathetic figure, that might make her criticism of trad culture more credible, because it’s hard to see a professional motive in a book that’s likely to annoy every political faction.

Every few decades, it seems, America is fated to endure a new spasm of pseudotraditionalism, with women encouraged to seek shelter from a brutal world in homemaking. The lionization of the housewife in the 1950s came after women were pushed out of their World War II-era jobs. During the 1980s, as Susan Faludi wrote in her classic “Backlash,” women were bombarded with media messages telling them true freedom lay in marriage and motherhood. In 2003, The New York Times Magazine heralded “The Opt-Out Revolution,” part of a wave of media about elite women stepping back from hard-charging careers.
IMG_4938.webp
I’m sure some women are happy renouncing their ambitions to care for husbands and children. But often, women who give in to gender retrenchment come to regret it. A decade after “The Opt-Out Revolution,” a Times Magazine headlineread, “The Opt-Out Generation Wants Back In.”
In her 2007 book “The Feminine Mistake,” Leslie Bennetts wrote, “I couldn’t possibly count the number of women I’ve interviewed who thought they could depend on a husband to support them but who ultimately found themselves alone and unprepared to take care of themselves — and their children.” It seems particularly dangerous to tie one’s fate to a man who is part of an internet subculture obsessed with female submission.
Unfortunately, the women who most need to hear this message probably won’t listen to middle-aged feminists. They’ll have to wait for it to play out in their own lives, or in the curated lives on their screens.


Michelle Goldberg has been an Opinion columnist since 2017. She is the author of several books about politics, religion and women’s rights and was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize for public service in 2018 for reporting on workplace sexual harassment.
 
Last edited:
Trad women don't have mixed children. Insert the picture from the joker movie where he says you get what you fucking deserve.
 
Can we still give her a little grace? Why not?

I could give grace but the fact that she is on a book and media tour being used by the left and the mainstream media - like the New York Times as a weapon against both the women in the Trump Adminsitration and against all kinds of women who made better choices than she did.

Despite the presence of a few high-profile women in Trump’s administration, the right is increasingly trying to drive women out of public life

That is what this is about. Don't believe your lying eyes. Any conservative women in politics is just a puppet of her fascist husband and they really all want women home barefoot and pregnant.

She is being used here in the article to attack women actually working in the Trump Administration who are not necessarily tradewifes. Its the old Hillary Clinton thing that conservative women are not real women. Because only feminist democrats are.

She is another willing prop for a war on conservatives.
 
But being an antifeminist, it turns out, is no shield against abusive male power. Southern’s new self-published memoir, “This Is Not Real Life,” is the story of conservative ideology colliding with reality. It’s made headlines for her claim that Andrew Tate, an unrepentant online misogynist accused of human trafficking, sexually assaulted her in Romania in 2018.
I feel like "tradwives" probably wouldn't hang around with pointy headed international sex offenders in the first place, and anyone calling herself a "tradwife" is a LARPer.

Women who raise their kids instead of working full time to pay someone else to raise their kids don't call themselves "tradwives", because normal people don't talk like 4chan.
 
I feel like "tradwives" probably wouldn't hang around with pointy headed international sex offenders in the first place, and anyone calling herself a "tradwife" is a LARPer.

Women who raise their kids instead of working full time to pay someone else to raise their kids don't call themselves "tradwives", because normal people don't talk like 4chan.
I feel like I only heard of him in the last 2-3 years and only because of liberals screeching about him. What was he doing in 2018 that made Lauren go to Romania?
 
Would trad not be:
Get married.
Have kids.
Care for kids.
Help husband keep house.
Save for old age while trying to have fun and raise good kids who can fend for themselves.
Watch husband die.
Die.

I mean...it is a pretty loose format. I get that tradwife has a certain meaning but maybe if we could just get back to traditional a bit...
 
Everyone on the right who hears this whore's name has the same reaction, oh yeah it's that grifter who said all the right things and then threw it all away with her actions, she doesn't represent us at all, good riddance, and so on.

Meanwhile wine-drunk shitlibs read this New York Times article, probably hear about her for the first time in their lives (it's 2025), and now think they're informed on deep right lore.
 
the right is increasingly trying to drive women out of public life.
Call me crazy but I don't really see this as some huge problem. Being in "public life" should be a begrudging necessity to serve you fellow man in way he cannot or is not willing to do himself.
Its a sign of our times that being a politician or otherwise public political figure is seen as a good thing for personal success and prosperity and not honorable and respectable service for ones fellow man.
Lauren Southern
And I stopped reading right there. Worthless grifter is retarded, more at 11.
 
I feel like I only heard of him in the last 2-3 years and only because of liberals screeching about him. What was he doing in 2018 that made Lauren go to Romania?

Tate grifted his way on to the british version of the big brother TV program in 2016 and got a small amount of publicity for being kicked off. He then pivoted after that in 2017-18 to grift off the Harvey Weinstein/MeeToo stuff going on about women. His grift was basically to take the anti-feminist view in any situation and to blame women for whatever happened to them. He was platformed by all kinds of people on the right around 2018-19 like Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones. But many people quickly figured out that he was a total shitbag.

Lauren would have met him in 2018 for co-grifting opportunities. He was very briefly a rising star in certain circles because he was so purely anti-MeToo and was preaching a somewhat acceptable message of women needing to take responsibility and make responsible decisions.
 
Would trad not be:
Get married.
Have kids.
Care for kids.
Help husband keep house.
Save for old age while trying to have fun and raise good kids who can fend for themselves.
Watch husband die.
Die.

I mean...it is a pretty loose format. I get that tradwife has a certain meaning but maybe if we could just get back to traditional a bit...
"Trad" is functionally meaningless at this point. Most people who use it apply it as a functional replacement for "good", without any consideration for what "traditional" could possibly mean, and will usually pick and choose which aspects of "traditional" they want to apply as is convenient. Traditional conservatives in particular like to play this game, where they like to claim that their promiscuous, college educated, career focused, feminist wives are "trad wives" because they cook sometimes, or go to church on holidays or some shit. It's all a fake and gay grift by a bunch of neo-marxists that want to sell you a book, course, or subscription to exploit you for financial gain, not a genuine, grassroots movement of people who want to return to tradition. Just imply to any of them that you want to hold women to actually traditional expectations, and they will have a feminist meltdown that culminates in telling you that traditionalism only really applies to men, not women.

I have personally had guys try to tell me their wives are traditional. My first question, which always tells me everything I need to know, is: "how many men have been inside of your wife?" Because if the answer is anything other than one man, himself, then I know for a fact this dude is totally full of shit and I should disregard every single thing he has to say on the topic of traditionalism, as used goods are not traditional in any capacity. I've even had a few try to pull a feminist simp reply and say "a real man" doesn't care about how many men "their" wife has fucked before, or something to that effect. It's all so very tiresome. Pretty much nobody actually has principles anymore, the English language doesn't mean anything anymore, and people misuse terms and words all the time to try to trick other people for social, economic, political, or legal benefit. Everything is fake and gay.
 
Do right-wing women think that the only playable character within their ideology is "trad wife"

Have none of them heard of Ann Colter? You can be a conservative woman without getting married and having kids. The worst thing that'll happen to you is that someone might say, "hey you're gonna regret this later" and all you have to do is say, "maybe."
 
Lauren Southern
lol. Lmao even. What next? An article about Fuentes’ semen hunt?

Ladies and gentlemen, the Failing New York Times.


Anyone who has sex with Destiny shouldn’t be taken seriously.


Michelle Goldberg has been an Opinion columnist since 2017. She is the author of several books about politics, religion and women’s rights and was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize for public service in 2018 for reporting on workplace sexual harassment.

And there it is…
 
Last edited:
Would trad not be:
Get married.
Have kids.
Care for kids.
Help husband keep house.
Save for old age while trying to have fun and raise good kids who can fend for themselves.
Watch husband die.
Die.

I mean...it is a pretty loose format. I get that tradwife has a certain meaning but maybe if we could just get back to traditional a bit...
From what I can gather, "tradwife" means "never stops posting pictures of herself on social media" 🤔
 
Any woman who unironically has sex with Destiny can never be wife material. That mental timber is so crooked it could be a wheel.
Irony has nothing to do with it. If you voluntarily engage in a sexual encounter with Tiny, you waive the right to be treated as a serious adult.
 
Back
Top Bottom