📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
i could rage at the last one but the use of the word "normie" checks itself out. they also ignore that their information sources are skewed.


might post some 4chan ones later idk i've heard they're even worse over there
Plenty of us disliked them all along and merely tolerated their existence out of pity or fear. Don’t get me wrong, there are a bunch of libshit women willing to go to bat for them, but not enough to save them. It’s Joever bros. Ask Siri for the nearest bridge.
 
i could rage at the last one but the use of the word "normie" checks itself out. they also ignore that their information sources are skewed.


might post some 4chan ones later idk i've heard they're even worse over there
Re: is biology an inclusive field?
Depends what he means. If he means that he can be trans and study Biology, yeah that’s fine. You can dye your hair weird colors and dress like a freak and ask to be called “ma’am” and nobody minds if you work hard and know your stuff.

If he’s asking if Biology will be respectful of tranny nonsense ideology like “I’m not trans I’m biologically female because (insert nonsense reasoning here)” well, no. That’s like wanting to be a mathematician with an ideological objection to numbers. Other biologists won’t respect that and it’ll likely bias them against your work even if it’s not directly related, because they’ll think “well if xe thinks he can argue with sex determination what other kooky stuff might he believe is true?”
 
Adding even more complication to the gendered language issue. 8)

1751559925504.webp
Reddit -- Archive
I am a trans guy and experience a lot of dysphoria around my body. With intimate partners I have a relationship of some sort with, I only want them to use masc terminology. With casual sex, I sometimes find it hot to talk about my body in ways I wouldn’t ordinarily feel comfortable with- I will tell them if I want them to use more fem terminology when it feels good. The big example that comes to mind is what parts of my genitals we talk about and the words we use for them.

What I don’t understand is why that sort of language/interaction with my body isn’t something I’m comfortable with with sexual partners that I have had some sort emotional connection with. It seems to only be something I want with very casual sex. The thought of fem terminology being used for my body by someone I have an emotionally intimate relationship with feels really bad.

Has anyone experienced anything like this? It feels weird to me for there to be certain words/interactions that are off the table with certain people, and I want to be able to make clear sense of it.
Key quotes:
With casual sex, I sometimes find it hot to talk about my body in ways I wouldn’t ordinarily feel comfortable with- I will tell them if I want them to use more fem terminology when it feels good.
The thought of fem terminology being used for my body by someone I have an emotionally intimate relationship with feels really bad.
Synopsis:
  • For screwing around she remains female.
  • For REAL LOVE (presumably with a gay man) better treat her male. :lit:
  • Totally not just a role playing game. :christine:
 
Last edited:
From a Reddit thread about a woman whose BF was real weird about her talking to other men - and then she drops that he's a crossdresser who masturbates in women's clothing, as well as to pictures of himself. Someone said he was an autogynephile, and of course it being Reddit a helpful MtF had to 'ackshully' the autogynephilia. (Yes, the Julia Serrano essay 'debunking' autogynephilia was linked, why do you ask?)

And then:
View attachment 7590739

"Autogynephilia isn't real but here's how I jerked my way into being trans, helped along by Covid isolation. And that's why I'm definitely a woman and not someone living a fetish."
I feel like part of the diagnosis for Gender Dysphoria should be isolating the subject from porn for a month, shit might genuinely save some lives.

Re: is biology an inclusive field?
Depends what he means. If he means that he can be trans and study Biology, yeah that’s fine. You can dye your hair weird colors and dress like a freak and ask to be called “ma’am” and nobody minds if you work hard and know your stuff.

If he’s asking if Biology will be respectful of tranny nonsense ideology like “I’m not trans I’m biologically female because (insert nonsense reasoning here)” well, no. That’s like wanting to be a mathematician with an ideological objection to numbers. Other biologists won’t respect that and it’ll likely bias them against your work even if it’s not directly related, because they’ll think “well if xe thinks he can argue with sex determination what other kooky stuff might he believe is true?”
The correct answer is sadly yes absolutely. There are a handful of interesting peoples in any of the sciences in my experience. Your professors and future employers will be forced to tip toe around his fragile ideology, less they get sued.
 
Ça. Chaque fois que je lis leurs diatribes sur l'inexistence de la femme biologique, mon cerveau s'ouvre comme Sherlock, un corps humain féminin se formant morceau par morceau : os, muscles, utérus, seins. La nature interconnectée et entière du corps humain est évidente. Le simple fait d'avoir des connaissances anatomiques de base fait voler en éclats leurs arguments logiques et complexes. Ils disent tous ces mots stupides, mais s'ils regardaient un homme et une femme nus côte à côte, n'importe qui comprendrait l'évidence. Il faut être profondément endoctriné ou carrément attardé pour affirmer qu'il n'existe pas de femme biologique, et la plupart des transsexuels cochent les deux cases.
I don't think this is such a difficult narrative to understand. The idea, as I understand it, is there is no such thing as a "biological woman," because "woman" is not a biological term. "Female" is biological and a matter of sex, but "woman" is not. The fact is that "woman" retains the meaning of "human female," so it's necessary to clarify the terminology beforehand, and some people simply don't want to try to understand about what's talking about, whether it's social constructs or irrefutable truths.
 
I don't think this is such a difficult narrative to understand. The idea, as I understand it, is there is no such thing as a "biological woman," because "woman" is not a biological term. "Female" is biological and a matter of sex, but "woman" is not. The fact is that "woman" retains the meaning of "human female," so it's necessary to clarify the terminology beforehand, and some people simply don't want to try to understand about what's talking about, whether it's social constructs or irrefutable truths.
got-it-everybody-got-that.gif
 
even when conceiving gender and sex as innately different, it irks the gender cult that there is any feasible way to refer to them by their birth sex instead of their preferred identity. hence the mental gymnastics to cover the 'biology' flank.

i honestly wouldn't give a fuck about what pronoun people want me to use for them if they didn't shriek and recoil away at the idea of having to acknowledge whatever they actually are. sure, dude, claim the word woman, but i'm not going to pretend you're female. you're a male. take the W most normies are offering you in pandering to your fantasy and stop trying to redefine biology.
 
French-posting on the 4th of July is a federal offense.
I thought you murricans got help from the french in your independence war.

I don't think this is such a difficult narrative to understand. The idea, as I understand it, is there is no such thing as a "biological woman," because "woman" is not a biological term. "Female" is biological and a matter of sex, but "woman" is not. The fact is that "woman" retains the meaning of "human female," so it's necessary to clarify the terminology beforehand, and some people simply don't want to try to understand about what's talking about, whether it's social constructs or irrefutable truths.
I don't think it is a good idea to talk about the semantics of female/woman/biological woman when you need translate software. Translation tools are a lot better now, but nuances between very similar words is difficult to translate.
 
I thought you murricans got help from the french in your independence war.
I've never in my life in mostly NY State heard another American say "murrican" but it seems to endlessly amuse people on the internet to imagine that's what people do. It's weird how foreigners think we're all mumbling Yosemite Sams, plus being religious fanatics.

Lafayette's contributions to the Revolutionary War are indeed well-taught in US schools, he was an awesome ally, very memorable. He was Han Solo to George Washington's Luke.
 
I've never in my life in mostly NY State heard another American say "murrican" but it seems to endlessly amuse people on the internet to imagine that's what people do. It's weird how foreigners think we're all mumbling Yosemite Sams, plus being religious fanatics.

Lafayette's contributions to the Revolutionary War are indeed well-taught in US schools, he was an awesome ally, very memorable. He was Han Solo to George Washington's Luke.
People say they weren't taught this or that in school but really what they mean is "I forgot".

Schools vary wildly on some stuff but I remember all the basics about pre-colonial/settler natives, going through why the pilgrims left England and how they first struggled to work the land, different beneficial or adversarial relationships with different tribes, through the revolutionary war (including how the French participated), war of 1812, Louisiana purchase, westward expansion, the civil war, industrial revolution, and on to modern stuff like the great depression and the world wars. There was also basic stuff about world history, enlightenment, french revolution, what everyone was sort of getting up to during the world wars. It was often as comprehensive as a k-12 education where most classes are 45 min with mostly uninterested kids could be. Movies based in certain time periods and documentaries were watched as sort of a treat while still covering stuff. This was in relatively nice but rural and smaller town schools from my experience, so it's not like this was only for smancy nice schools that. The revolutionary war is taught as a lot more nuanced than people give credit not only in French involvement covered but it's routinely acknowledged one issue for the Brits was that they were spread very thin throughout the empire and had trouble allocating the manpower and resources that could've smothered it.

Wildly off topic but anyway.
 
They also think they are “girls” online circa MySpace 2004.
They are so obsessed with the early 2000s at the moment as if the early 2000s were accepting of them in the first place. If anyone saw a man like that on social media back then, or in public, he would be called a faggot and told to fuck off.
People say they weren't taught this or that in school but really what they mean is "I forgot".
Most people treated history class as the class to take a nap in within school, hence where the "I was never taught this" came from. Even though history in the US can be taught a bit better.
 
Back
Top Bottom