💰 Grifter Kino Casino - Read Kiwifarms with abortionist A-a-andy Warski and lardy PPP. A lolcow drama show. 2/28/2019, never forget.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Cog's video features a clip of Warski on the Killstream claiming that the Snapchat logs are fake but insisting that "even if they were real" it would have been legal in his jurisdiction which is a MAJOR red flag. This is like saying "the hair follicle tests are unreliable and that result is a false positive but even if the test result were accurate, Aaron must have sprinkled something over those Spaghetti-Os!!!!"
It happened many years ago so I don't even remember the specifics. Corey Barnhill (a fat paedophile and a liar) was involved too, because of course he was. Initially he said it was real but then started defending tard saying it was fake. The entire thing was really weird and everyone involved quickly brushed it under the rug. Tardski claimed one can just go on Fiverr to buy a video like this. I don't think so.

If I wanted to prove my recording is real, I will record the application being opened, open up my own profile and so on. I always edged on it being quite dubious. We can't prove it's real but we can't prove it's definitely fake.
 
PPP can actually talk about something and provide some kind of insight and interest in it. Warski can barely read a article, and anything he finds "interesting" is boring shit, and he adds zero commentary.
If PPP learned how to use OBS he would be on par with Josh, when it comes to stream quality.
I miss his gorilla-style streams with his fucked up front camera on his tablet. His strong suit is not technology, but being knowledgeable in subjects.
 
It happened many years ago so I don't even remember the specifics. Corey Barnhill (a fat paedophile and a liar) was involved too, because of course he was. Initially he said it was real but then started defending tard saying it was fake. The entire thing was really weird and everyone involved quickly brushed it under the rug. Tardski claimed one can just go on Fiverr to buy a video like this. I don't think so.

If I wanted to prove my recording is real, I will record the application being opened, open up my own profile and so on. I always edged on it being quite dubious. We can't prove it's real but we can't prove it's definitely fake.
To me the weirdest thing is Tardski's reaction EVEN TO THIS DAY. I feel like we need to dig the streams from back then, problem is most were deleted except rogue archives cause iirc wasn't this during the stream.me era ? If we can investigate the archives maybe we can come to a more salient conclusion. But to me Tardski's reactions SCREAM RED FLAG.
 
I looked into Trandy Beejamski's snapchat incident. The girl in question was allegedly 16-17. The age of consent in Canada according to Canada's DoJ is 16, with some cases being higher if the older person is an authority figure (like 21-year-old teacher and 16-year-old student). Even if the messages were real, Trandy is at most a creep.

Message screenshots here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/andy-...-purple-dragon-kino-casino.41000/post-3869466
Messages and video of the Snapchat interface resided in a folder called "GayOps".
View attachment 4085235

This freak chimes in.
View attachment 4085256

Considering the people involved and the people pushing it, I think it's a gayop. The messages were probably real messages sent back and forth on sock accounts. The evidence brought forth is shoddy as fuck with basic facts being mixed up.
That's my position when the Snapchat stuff resurfaced. I will maintain both positions but with stronger wording. A man in his 30s should not be sexually texting someone who's 16-17 even if it's technically legal. It's more than just being creepy, it's morally wrong.

It's still really dubious. The video was in a folder called "gayops", really guys?
 
That's my position when the Snapchat stuff resurfaced. I will maintain both positions but with stronger wording. A man in his 30s should not be sexually texting someone who's 16-17 even if it's technically legal. It's more than just being creepy, it's morally wrong.

It's still really dubious. The video was in a folder called "gayops", really guys?
The answer is easy to deduct. Only a guilty person would do this. A guilty person that is also retarded. Now the big question is does Warski meet both criteria?
:thinking:
What if both are true ? What if he got gayopped into a sting situation. I mean yes he did get catfished in this case and gayopped but at the same time what triggers his guilty conscience to this day would be that in his head he actually thought he was sexting a minor which was his guilty pleasure. And for him to be THAT jumpy about it, it could even be something that he does to this day that he is deathly afraid of being leaked. Who knows maybe he gets caught in an Alex Rosen sting in the near future.
 
What if both are true ? What if he got gayopped into a sting situation. I mean yes he did get catfished in this case and gayopped but at the same time what triggers his guilty conscience to this day would be that in his head he actually thought he was sexting a minor which was his guilty pleasure. And for him to be THAT jumpy about it, it could even be something that he does to this day that he is deathly afraid of being leaked. Who knows maybe he gets caught in an Alex Rosen sting in the near future.
It's suspect as fuck for anyone over like 25 to even know what Snapchat is.
 
PPP can at least formulate complete sentences and break down a topic. Or he could if Warski toned down the chimp noises.
PPP has noticeably declined and his "complete sentences" are him yelling loudly about things that contradict earlier things he said.
PPP can actually talk about something and provide some kind of insight and interest in it. Warski can barely read a article, and anything he finds "interesting" is boring shit, and he adds zero commentary.
If PPP learned how to use OBS he would be on par with Josh, when it comes to stream quality.
Josh's streams are terrible, what are you talking about? PPP doesn't make insightful commentary. He falls back on several rhetorical crutches where he is actually just saying the same thing about almost every person he covers. He sabotages segments based on his moods (he's lazy). Every piece of commentary he makes these days is lifted from posts on Kiwifarms and I have seen him repeat posts verbatim.

I probably went too far saying he is just as bad because I've seen what abortski is like on Twisted Minds, but the problems with the show are way more than just Warski.
 
I wanted to bring it up again after the first Kino Casino crash but people quickly told me not only was it confirmed to be fake, the person who made it admitted to it or vanished, never following up. If this were a fake, it was really convincing. If not, then it's another Tardski incident we all overlooked because the retard had too much benefit of the doubt.
I took the claim it was fake at face value but the more I look into it the logic seems circular? It seems to me that Metokur swept it up for Andy regardless of whether he was guilty or not of the sins he was accused of just like he would later sweep for a guilty Flam and now guilty VTubers. I'm not saying it's 100% guaranteed to be real, but instead that I'm not seeing the obvious conclusive proof that these were fabricated that I would expect for people to be as confident in dismissing it as they are.

The last time it came up in this thread, not long after the Vegas leaks at the end of last year, @Captain Manning pointed to the best summary of the evidence as to why it was fake here. (Nothing negative intended towards @Captain Manning, he linked to the most substantive post I could find from poking around the contemporaneous posts in that thread myself.)
Andy did address it, long ago, and it was generally agreed Andy was almost certainly the victim of a gay op. @Secret Asshole has a good summary about what happened here. Some of the surrounding posts are a pretty decent read too.
- Beginning: Andy secures leaked audio of gay OPs. He waits for a long time and lines his ducks in a row, making sure its legit and then release the nuke.
- Tonka has been running with the skeptics in order to destroy Andy/Ralph/Jim
- Tonka has been working with Kraut and running lots of gay OPs
- Kraut didn't 'accidentally' come on the Kumite. It was planned and the acting was gay tier
- Andy's 'conspiracy theory' about Analvape, Tonka, Kraut and the Skeptics working together to destroy Jim/Ralph was true
- Andy was a target because he suddenly got popular
- They also wanted to destroy Joachim
- Tonka was proven to offer $2k to get Jim's dox but was declined EDIT: Someone might have actually took the money and that's why Jim was doxed, enlisting the help of one of the guys on the farms. This is rumored.
- They discuss the fact that they're planning to 'ruin Andy' which basically confirms that the Snapchat stuff was a gay OP and cannot be trusted

But that logic does not seem to follow at all to me? And some of the contemporaneous complaints in the thread didn't age well, since there was later a video of scrolling through the messages (shown in Cog's video) that makes it much more difficult to fake, at that point you can't just edit images, you would have to at minimum create a fake Andy Warski account.

Beyond that Warski had the very suspicious cope that even if it wasn't fake, it was legal, there's also interesting things like the fact that the name in the screenshot changes from the display name "🍨 andy" to "andywarski" between some of the screenshots/videos, which was supposed to be suspicious. This was explained away by saying that Warski blocked the girl in between some of the screenshots, which caused the username to revert to "andywarski".

From what I can tell, this isn't the behavior that results from blocking (in this case the chat logs would be deleted and she wouldn't have been able to find Warski's account). But this appears to be what would have happened if she had set a custom name for Warski on Snapchat and then Warski unfriended her on Snapchat without blocking her, as this would wipe the custom name she had set. Why would you do this if you were faking it and then not even have the story as to why it happened match up to reality?

1751579011729.webp

I'm just gonna say, whoever supposedly "faked" the Snapchat logs got Andy's writing mannerisms down 100%. That's really wild that the person who faked the logs was able to pull that off. Super crazy.
Supposedly "fake" Snapchat logs

1751570713463.webp 1751581287675.webp

Texts leaked by Raven (British single mom Warski tried to e-date after KC started)

1751570763797.webp 1751570805382.webp 1751579155315.webp 1751584507256.webp 1751584476522.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom