US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
The Ugly One said:
We have had 200 years of laws against obscenity and the distribution of pornographic content. These laws have never led to general prohibitions on books, general laws on political speech, general regulations on the distribution of speech, general laws against immoral speech, and so on. In other words, we have centuries of history showing that regulation of pornography does not lead ineluctably to aboloshing the First Amendment. You need a compelling argument for why this time is different.
Click to expand...

There is no argument that need be made because this isn't hypothetical or philosphical. It already exists and politicians and corporations openly talk about expanding it.

 
BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny said:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: JD Vance, needs to weild his constitutional power as President of the Senate. I expect Thune to cuck, and it's no surprise to me that the Democrat parliamentarian is ripping the BBB to shreds. But JD Vance is supposed to be *our* guy, he's MAGA. If he's going to abandon the BBB to protect "institutional norms" rather than the interests of the American people, then I will blame him since he's the only one I ever expected would do anything to help.
Click to expand...
He fucking better, the only thing I figure I'm realistically going to get here is suppressors and SBRs. If we lose those provisions from the bill, then I'm done with the GOP. Getting rid of illegals is something I like, but not if they are immediately going to be replaced by the Jeet horde the second some space clears up. I've given up hope on movement against the "legal" replacement of Americans, so at least give me this one actual win.
 
Whenever you talk of the gays just outshitlord the faggot lovers. Go into excruciating detail about your favorite gay acts. Talk at length how much more romantic than straight people it is that they are willing to suck the cum out of each other's assholes after dropping a load. How much they must love someone to take their pozzed load of hiv positive cum knowing it will shorten their life and put extra burden on the Healthcare system. How they have much higher loyalty they have to put on a puppy mask and crawl around on all fours. How much more realistic a tranny neo vagina is than the failure of gods natural creation. How pure a man breast feeding their own child milk full of artificial hormones is compared to slutty boring regular women doing so.

If anyone even so much dares to disagree or has the audacity to tell you to stop going into detail call them a disgusting homophobic nazi and demand they explain why they think its ok to insult or denigrate gay people.
 
Hexadecimal said:
SCOTUS just told the district courts to fuck themselves.
6-3 ACB wrote it.


Dissent is the liberal women crying about birthright which ACB says is premature cuz the case wasn’t even about birthright.

“federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too."

“We observe only this:JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while em-bracing an imperial Judiciary."
Click to expand...
So, to explain what the ruling means, for USPOL tourists, if someone wants to challenge one of Trump's EOs, they have to go before a court and argue their case. EACH INDIVIDUAL. So, every TDA sleaze getting deported under the Alien Enemies act has to try and hire a lawyer. Some Guatamalan criminal alien tries to pop out a beanie baby? Gonna need a lawyer.

This is how it's always worked for everything else, like why GOA suing over the pistol brace ruling meant that GOA members got an injunction of enforcement while the law was challenged in the courts, but other people could still catch a felony over that ATF ruling.
 
Gottahavemysips said:
He fucking better, the only thing I figure I'm realistically going to get here is suppressors and SBRs. If we lose those provisions from the bill, then I'm done with the GOP. Getting rid of illegals is something I like, but not if they are immediately going to be replaced by the Jeet horde the second some space clears up. I've given up hope on movement against the "legal" replacement of Americans, so at least give me this one actual win.
Click to expand...
He's not going to. He hasn't even spoken about this once. The BBB is a failure.
 
Hexadecimal said:
gay nigga story time case
6-3 Alito writing libcucks dissenting



The court first holds that the parents are likely to succeed on their claim that the policy of not allowing opt-outs unconstitutionally burdens their exercise of their religion.
“we have long recognized," Alito writes, "the rights of parents to direct 'the religious upbringing' of their children. And we have held that those rights are violated by government policies that substantially interfere with the religious development of children."

Sotomayor: The reverberations of the Court’s error will be felt, I fear,for generations. Unable to condone that grave misjudgment, I dissent.
Click to expand...
Taqiyya award.
 
PointOfNoReturnPoint said:
Rare Muslim W for us!
Click to expand...
God damnit, the Falafel eating cave niggers did us a solid for once. You win this time, but I'll get you next time Mohammad, NEXT TIME!!!!

Hunter Hearst Helmsley said:
lol. She was called out bigtime.
Click to expand...
Wow. What did she do to piss people off? I mean there's the obvious but she clearly went AWOL with this one.

Dan Abrams said:
See. Its not over. I will continue dooming for two more weeks
Click to expand...
Until Morale improves or to slow the spread?

Catch The Rainbow said:
Lawyer who represented 96 Jan 6th people and spent 22 years as a federal prosecutor gives his take
Click to expand...
Watching ACB descend into embracing her inner cracker in real time is what I voted for.

faraomuurahainen said:
Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787M in defamation case over Trump call
Click to expand...
Nigga what? Okay, where's your proof of what the call entailed? There were screenshots from Trump's phone alleging the story Waters said. How do we know YOU'RE not lying NewsCum? Oh and now the press lying matters? How about Family Man Abrego? Oh and prove damages, faggot.

Fatpacks said:
He's not going to. He hasn't even spoken about this once. The BBB is a failure.
Click to expand...
I love you so much, Reverse Oracle. Null needs to pin that tag to your banner.
 
Regardless of how one feels about the US government's attack on Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the fact is that it was the greatest foreign policy achievement in memory. Predictably, neoliberals want to deny him the political capital Trump has earned.

To this end, Deep State subhumans left over from the age of John Brennan leaked selective disinformation from a likely bogus report downplaying the mission’s success. The conduit was none other than CNN’s Natasha Bertrand. Karoline Leavitt explains why she was an apt choice:
https://xcancel.com/RapidResponse47/status/1938290608755331079
1751046371589.webp

If something out of the "intelligence" community jibes conveniently with what the shitlibs running the media would like you to think, chances are it is no more true than the Russian disinformation lie they used to keep the Hunter Biden laptop revelations from sparing humanity of Biden’s disastrous presidency.
 
Watching faggots champion an Israeli bureaucracy tracking your IRL identity and correlating it with your internet history (because surprise surprise, all these age verification operations are Israeli) on kiwifarms of all places is a massive blackpill. You people deserve to have the Democrat boot on your throats when the cycle comes around again.
 
GunCar Gary said:
people who cheer on age verification, on Kiwi Farms of all places, which will absolutely lead to ID requirements for all webpages that will completely kill the internet as we know it is always so strange
Click to expand...
"Oh, but that's a slippery slope fallacy and can't happen! Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to inform people how gay marriage leads to grooming children into being trans!"
 
So, this month started with the USNS Harvey Milk being renamed, is ending with SCOTUS ruling that parents can in fact protect their kids from having the rainbow barfed down their throat on religious grounds, and has had a much more muted take on Pride by the corporate world in-between. A pretty good Pride Month, but I daresay still far from the best: that prize can rightly only go to the Pride Month where Obergefell v. Hodges is overturned and whatever shit law Congress passed to make gay marriage into the law of the land on a federal level (don't remember its name atm but it had a bunch of 'based' Republican supporters, like Nancy Mace) also gets declared unconstitutional.
 
Fcret said:
Watching faggots champion an Israeli bureaucracy tracking your IRL identity and correlating it with your internet history (because surprise surprise, all these age verification operations are Israeli) on kiwifarms of all places is a massive blackpill. You people deserve to have the Democrat boot on your throats when the cycle comes around again.
Click to expand...
Couldn't have said it better myself. The blackpill is the only logical position at this point. We get what we fucking deserve.

Mass suicides on our side of the aisle are inevitable once Dems take back power. It will make tranny suicide rates look like a joke in comparison.
 
nelly98 said:
A boomer has a very tricky question that stupid Republicans could never counter.

1751043457853.webp
Click to expand...
Oh this is actually good? You cannot technically deport someone you have no jurisdiction over.Either way i highly doubt An executive order can stop birthright citizenship, you'll need a constitutional amendment to do that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom