UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs

7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

Can't even have an elephant slide now...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2k1djpqyvko

The neighbours sound bitter as fuck. He probably put the elephant there to piss them off.

 

[ApeBass]

They're not working class if they live in a nice, leafy, rural areas. Unless you're defining it in purely financial sense, which is retarded.
The working class and the scumbags that @A-Logato describes are those in squalid, urban council estates that are their own world, with unique problems, outlooks and issues.
Sure, you can have someone earning a living wage living in a leafy, sleepy, countryside town, but they are not the same working class as the tramps on council estates, and to think they are says more about your experience of the lowest of the social ladder than anything else.

So you believe a cleaner living in a council house in a rural village is not working class?
I don't think I'm the one with the "retarded" understanding of British social hierarchy.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

So you believe a cleaner living in a council house in a rural village is not working class?
I don't think I'm the one with the "retarded" understanding of British social hierarchy.

What did I say in my previous post? If you're determining working class solely on what they earn, then obviously, they're the same. However, if you think working class on a council estate in glasgow is the same as a cleaner who lives in little-hampton-on-the-wolds then you're retarded and have no idea about social heirarchy.

 

[ApeBass]

What did I say in my previous post? If you're determining working class solely on what they earn, then obviously, they're the same. However, if you think working class on a council estate in glasgow is the same as a cleaner who lives in little-hampton-on-the-wolds then you're retarded and have no idea about social heirarchy.

I made no mention of what the cleaner earns. A self-employed cleaner can easily earn more than an office administrator where I live. That doesn't imply the cleaner is middle class and the office admin is working class.
You're just proving the point that working class people aren't a monolith.

 

[A-Logato]

I made no mention of what the cleaner earns. A self-employed cleaner can easily earn more than an office administrator where I live. That doesn't imply the cleaner is middle class and the office admin is working class.
You're just proving the point that working class people aren't a monolith.

The percentage of working class people in a rural leafy village in the Cotswolds as an example compared to the numbers you'll find in a council estates across the whole country is not even comparable. Your comparing a tiny number of the working class to the vastly larger majority of them.

So if where I've lived is not representative of the working class then where ever you've lived where they apparently earn more money the admins certainly is not at all representative of the rest of country.

 

[ApeBass]

The percentage of working class people in a rural leafy village in the Cotswolds as an example compared to the numbers you'll find in a council estates across the whole country is not even comparable. Your comparing a tiny number of the working class to the vastly larger majority of them.

So if where I've lived is not representative of the working class then where ever you've lived where they apparently earn more money the admins certainly is not at all representative of the rest of country.

Working class people live in cities, suburban areas, and rural areas. They live on council estates, rent privately, and have mortgages.
They live in the Cotswolds, in Liverpool, in deepest darkest west Wales. Some earn minimum wage, some live off benefits, some earn more than office administrators. They are all still working class.
For the last time, working class people are not a monolith.

 

[>IMPLYING]

The working class are not a monolith. Treating them as one is how you end up with all the problems we have today.

I think there's a factor of age and region involved that adds further complexity to it. To enter the middle class the household income apparently has to be over earning over £34k a year... Nope! I don't know anybody personally who does either.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

I think there's a factor of age and region involved that adds further complexity to it. To enter the middle class the household income apparently has to be over earning over £34k a year... Nope! I don't know anybody personally who does either.

Huh, I'm middle class. Wild stuff. £34K a year is fuck all, insane that that's considered middle class. That's literally just two people who are employed.

 

[Tony Martin's Force Ghost]

Poor bros rise up, but seriously, this civil war is going to be great. If it gets bad, we can recreate Shaun of the Dead, replacing the zombies with jeets.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

I made no mention of what the cleaner earns. A self-employed cleaner can easily earn more than an office administrator where I live. That doesn't imply the cleaner is middle class and the office admin is working class.
You're just proving the point that working class people aren't a monolith.

What is working class to you? Because your definition is all over the place. Do you think that working class is someone who runs their own business and lives in a leafy village?

Huh, I'm middle class. Wild stuff. £34K a year is fuck all, insane that that's considered middle class. That's literally just two people who are employed.

That's middle class definition in the same way the vax was safe and effective, in the same way that protests were fiery but mostly peaceful, that concerns over immigration is far-right terrorism, in the same way that men can be women...

 

[ApeBass]

What is working class to you? Because your definition is all over the place. Do you think that working class is someone who runs their own business and lives in a leafy village?

You honestly believe no working class people exist outside of cities? Everyone who is self-employed, even for cash-in-hand work, is middle class? Come on.

The working class are the social group consisting primarily of people who are employed in unskilled or semi-skilled manual or industrial work. Education and qualification levels are another factor to consider, but location is not.

 

[teriyakiburns]

No enter the middle class the household income apparently has to be over earning over £34k a year...

That's median wage, not middle class. A middle class income is variable depending on location. It's hard to define these days, because class used to be a primarily social status rather than a purely economic one. You had blue and white collar workers (physical and clerical), who were both workers, with different social status and similar economic status. The "middle class" was something that only emerged within the last couple of hundred years, as a group of people who weren't workers and weren't clergy or clerical workers, but also weren't the landed gentry. The middle class were - and still are - typically very wealthy. Far wealthier than the definitions popularly used today.

I honestly believe there's been a strong push to break the identity of the workers from multiple directions, for likely mutually opposing reasons that nevertheless end up at the same end state, with half the working class attempting to identify as "middle class" out of shame or ambition, or pride, or just because that's what they've been told to do by the media.

 

[>IMPLYING]

People in this thread who grew up and lived in the dingiest, rundown areas of the country and were thus also exposed to the worst dregs their country offered know how deep into shit some people can sink. "Working class" is the term they use but I think it's too broad a categorisation to include people earning less than 34k but also people who are content to a rather parasitic lifestyle. I hate to use Marx for this but he was a rather affluent fellow (son of industrialists) so when he got rather heated over the fact a majority of voting-age men in France (7 million out of 9 million - 500k no votes) decided to give Napoléon the 3rd more power, he finally gave a name to a vague class of people he only alluded to in his manifesto:

“The ‘dangerous class’, the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society... may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution; its conditions of life, however, prepare it far more for the part of a bribed tool of reactionary intrigue.”

He called such people the Lumpenproletariat, and elaborated on it subsequently:

“Alongside decayed roués with questionable means of subsistence and of questionable origin, alongside ruined and adventurous offshoots of the bourgeoisie, were vagabonds, discharged soldiers, discharged jailbirds, escaped galley slaves, swindlers, mountebanks, lazzaroni, pickpockets, tricksters, gamblers, maquereaux [pimps], brothel keepers, porters, literati, organ grinders, ragpickers, knife grinders, tinkers, beggars—in short, the whole indefinite, disintegrated mass, thrown hither and thither, which the French term ‘la bohème’...”

Underclass will also do, or maybe we can invent a new term. The Subterranean class, maybe? Or the Buried class, because the government would rather just forget about them than deal with? But I digress.

I had an experience semi-recently visiting a nearby borough that was at the butt of jokes for years in my circle of friends (because one of them lived there) and I thought his tales about how shit it was was hyberbole. It's given me somewhat of an understanding to those I originally perceived to be larping or inconsolably black pilled. I wish I could share the area this was so you can see for yourself on google maps or something but I don't even want to allude vaguely to my area.

Oh I went [his area] last week. Insisted upon by [person 1] and [person 2]. Passed by the Oodles you order from. Went into a shopping centre-like place similar to [my area].
I saw two shoplifters in B&Ms
A ton more niqabs about than I saw in [my area], an unusual number of who were in Primark. Do they care what they have on under there? I guess they do. Worst McDonalds I ever had (didn't eat the awful fries, indulged on a full fat coke instead) — I'm guessing in-store food got shitter because they need to make sure the higher quality food is what's sent out on delivery, as there was 5 guys sitting out front on phones with bikes and deliveroo/uber bags on the back.

Thought you were exaggerating about [his area].

Nah, you guys have been living in paradise. These are the frontlines

It's alright [friend], I get it now.

I know I went to a McDonalds and not a Greggs but there wasn't one.

At bare minimum, I've seen how shit and squalid people can have it, and how that contributes to their mindset. No Fedposter, he's not a plod. Trust.

Regarding class, I think the upper classes who isolate themselves from the classes below tend to be the worst for leadership since that isolation remains with them even in government, putting far too much distance between themselves and the electorate to know what they truly want. For example, Margaret Thatcher had more exposure to people outside her social class in her youth than Starmer did.

Keir:

Thatcher:

Maybe it's not a class thing at all and everyone born South of Cambridge is just a cunt?

 

[Chunky Salsa]

At bare minimum, I've seen how shit and squalid people can have it.

My student house at uni was on a road where some working girls used to frequent. Average age looked to be about 60, they were all strung out. They used to literally just have a pile of mattresses around the back of a garage lot, where they and their boyfriends/pimps would just do drugs. I used to get up for a 6am run, and have to dodge around strung out drug users asleep on the pavement.

I like the people I grew up with, and I grew up in a very poor area; I've done a lot of homeless outreach. I wouldn't tar the whole working class with a brush, but the working class does produce some truly world class scum. Real examples of gas chamber bait, real 'feed them to the furnace' type people. They aren't down on their luck, they aren't good honest salt of the earth workers that just need a chance. They are scum.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

You honestly believe no working class people exist outside of cities? Everyone who is self-employed, even for cash-in-hand work, is middle class? Come on.

That's a fair question. Is Phil the plumber who is self-employed and raking in £60k+ working class? No, I wouldn't class him as that. Is he middle-class? Maybe. If he is he's lower-middle class, which thinking about it, is probably where our disagreements over classification come in.
There has been a decimation of the middle class with a wedge driven straight through it, pushing the bottom end into a nu-working class. The old working-class that I know; the council estate dwelling chavs, and the working-class that you know; the ex, lower-middle class, are two sides of the same card.
In the same way, I believe the upper class still exist, the old aristocracy and Lords of lands, but they have punted the lower spectrum of the upper-class firmly into the upper ends of the middle-class, in the same way that they were splintered.


Funnily enough that ties into the discussion a page or so back where people were in disagreement with who rules the country, and a spergpost I made here or the conspiracy thread. . The HR luvvies who rule over us through browbeating ideology, do so because they used to be upper class, but the upper class have shed them like the useless anchor they were and ran off into safety, creating a buffer between those with real money, and the face of nu-elite who don't rule us, but believe they do.

 

[ApeBass]

There has been a decimation of the middle class with a wedge driven straight through it, pushing the bottom end into a nu-working class.

I'd say there has also been a decimation of the working class with a wedge driven straight through it, pushing the bottom end into an underclass.
Based on Phil the plumber's background he may consider himself working class or lower-middle class. He may also have been privately educated and rejected the con of university debt and realised he could make more money at a younger age as a plumber, much to his upper-middle class parents' disappointment.

It's not always obvious which social class someone belongs to, there are several factors to consider, not just job title.

 

[Mound Dweller]

Spoiler: personal sperg

Lol I didn’t at any point give any indication as to my personal beliefs concerning abortion, I was correcting wildly sensational info regarding the changes to abortion law and SIDS. For the record, I’ve never had an abortion nor would ever have one, and am literally the furthest point a human could possibly be from a baby killer, seeing as I am in third trimester of growing one

Spoiler: shameless judgement

Indications are aplenty, all we can do is act on the provided output and fill in the blanks m8.
Don't take this the wrong way but your wording has you come across very strongly as a certain bad stereotype, I'm sure you know the one, happy you aren't it, because it's not one of the good ones (tm). Well done doing your part to grow Der Grobe Kiwi Rasse btw good luck with all that

Anyway the potential implications of reckless decriminalisation (anything done that fast is by definition reckless) are much more interesting than any moralfagging/gendersperging over dead babies IMO, sensationalist? it'd say it's downright likely (so far as laws go anyway, I don't buy into the SIDSpiracy, it's a bit silly).

It having the same (unintended (?)) consequences as it did in progressive modern Denmark for example, when they bravely brought everything into line and blanket abolished sodomy offences, and accidentally made legal everything from bestiality to child porn in the process would be a hilarious and horrifying but also a very possible scenario, and I could totally see our lovely gov bumbling right into that, couldn't you?

 

[Le b0wski]

That's median wage, not middle class. A middle class income is variable depending on location. It's hard to define these days, because class used to be a primarily social status rather than a purely economic one. You had blue and white collar workers (physical and clerical), who were both workers, with different social status and similar economic status. The "middle class" was something that only emerged within the last couple of hundred years, as a group of people who weren't workers and weren't clergy or clerical workers, but also weren't the landed gentry. The middle class were - and still are - typically very wealthy. Far wealthier than the definitions popularly used today.

I honestly believe there's been a strong push to break the identity of the workers from multiple directions, for likely mutually opposing reasons that nevertheless end up at the same end state, with half the working class attempting to identify as "middle class" out of shame or ambition, or pride, or just because that's what they've been told to do by the media.

I usually go with the definition of both parents having had degrees so it would typically take 2-3 generations for someone to climb up. Problem is they practically hand degrees out in cereal boxes now so something that was off limits as it was too financially difficult before just isn't now so a degree isn't a sign parents forked out £££ like it would have been a few decades ago.

Also do agree has been a huge push to break the identity of workers, for the most part encouraging every poor person into thinking they will become a footballer or tiktok star or some other 0 to hero thing. They don't work to make stuff better for themselves as they think any day now they will be slingshot out of poverty to never look back.

 

[Zoot]

We're finally on the verge of a race war and driving the BAMES into the sea and you niggers are still on about class war. Get with the times

 

[>IMPLYING]

My student house at uni was on a road where some working girls used to frequent. Average age looked to be about 60, they were all strung out. They used to literally just have a pile of mattresses around the back of a garage lot, where they and their boyfriends/pimps would just do drugs. I used to get up for a 6am run, and have to dodge around strung out drug users asleep on the pavement.

I like the people I grew up with, and I grew up in a very poor area; I've done a lot of homeless outreach. I wouldn't tar the whole working class with a brush, but the working class does produce some truly world class scum. Real examples of gas chamber bait, real 'feed them to the furnace' type people. They aren't down on their luck, they aren't good honest salt of the earth workers that just need a chance. They are scum.

I agree with you about the broad strokes brush part, so I tried making a graph of distribution to help visualise what I can't put into words at the moment. SCUM in this case works on its own merit, or can be used an acronym for: selfish, clueless, unpleasant and manipulative.


More working class = more probability of scum, but it still remains the overall minority of the working class.

I also grew up in a poor. I've gone through a year where my house was a metaphorical dosshouse (I was 11 or 12 at the time, people were drinking when I woke up in the morning and even long after I got back from school, also my first experience with weed, the odour following me to school since the smell soaked into my uniform — fucking awful). I tried to compensate for a lack of money by being posh in effect: speaking clearly, showing no disrespect towards teachers, keeping quiet in class, etcetera — something I saw was lacking in the people I generally grew up around. Yes this made me look autistic as shit. I think you either fully embrace the life you were born into, good or bad, or you attempt some sort of change that hopefully reflects well on your character and your future. You last thing you want to do is rot.