In that case shouldn't you be replacing Finland with Iceland? Finnish isn't even in the same language group if we're gonna be Scandinavian prude snobs.In the fight to get the bodycam everyone is.
(I do not count Denmark, they aren’t a part of the Peninsula).
Also, it looks like Rekieta is issuing orders to his loyal retards to attack Sean, Kurt, and anyone fat who’s criticized him.
Top left https://kiwifarms.st/threads/patrick-alan-melton-nobody-likes-onions-the-queen.200215/
Nick does not have the wherewithal to use a black powder rifle to blow his brains out with. I doubt he even has the toe strength to Kobain himself if he were even able to load and compact the round.
He did accuse Hardin of "lying to the court" (which is rich, coming from Nick, whose guilty plea was a lie, he thinks he should have been acquitted).
Does this supposed lawyer think it just ends there?
Why would the judge un-rule what he already ruled on? Him denying this was all but a foregone conclusion, and it was expected to go to the Court of Appeals.
Anything to create the illusion of a W.
He hasn't called Hardin a pedophile that should die so Nick's actually showing restraint here
“Misrepresenting the facts to court is very serious”?!
He's suing on his own behalf and has a history of public records litigation. He has every right to it that any other member of the public does, and possibly more from a record of already engaging in such litigation completely unconnected to the Farms.
Nick is an absolute moron and completely ignorant of the law. While it is not common for members of the public or even the media to intervene in a criminal case, this is why it happens. Usually it's in cases where the judge, for whatever reason, arbitrarily decides to close cases to the public.
is that like telling the court your codefendant wasn't properly mirandized?
I agree, he is the man for the job for a reason
Well, there's three. I doubt very much that Fischer would want to preside over it. She removed herself from Monty.
If he did though, it would be another win for the toe.
Does he really think it matters if Judge Wetzel agrees with his own previous decision? Yeah no shit, this is sophistry since it was never going to end with the Judge’s decision on his own actions. Tell me you don’t understand the appellate procedure without telling me you’re a non-practicing attorney.
