😵‍💫 Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

[Florence]

Wear a fucking dress Aut you coward.

Nobody cared who he was until he put on the dress.

It was by Cuntster's cabal that he was promised a lifelong prescription of HRT and eventual SRS in exchange for returning this very favour, or should I say duty, designated to him; a strong pull for someone who basically comes from nothing, and I mean, these kid's demeanours reeked of ghetto vermin infestation.

You're a) delusional, and b) projecting massively. Did you know that most people who blame conspiracies for their lives being shit do so as a means of denial that they themselves were to blame?

 

[LagoonaBlue]

You're a) delusional, and b) projecting massively. Did you know that most people who blame conspiracies for their lives being shit do so as a means of denial that they themselves were to blame?

Let the idiot have his fun.

 

[Autphag]

Let the idiot have his fun.

Only Cuntster speaks like that, you know.

 

[Begemot]

Only Cuntster speaks like that, you know.

Or maybe there's no massive conspiracy. Maybe all these things are utterly disconnected and you're finding a plot where there is none.

 

[Autphag]

Or maybe there's no massive conspiracy. Maybe all these things are utterly disconnected and you're finding a plot where there is none.

The coincidentiality copout only works to a point, when the inevitable constellation of correlants which ensue from unsolved connections don't grow so large that an explanation isn't unavoidable. But we've long surpassed that point. You are all awfully comfortable ostriches. I'm afraid the tenure of your heads in the sand is close to termination, unfortunately for you.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

Only Cuntster speaks like that, you know.

If you don't shut the fuck up I'm having a dildo sent to your house.

 

[Begemot]

The coincidentiality copout only works to a point, when the inevitable constellation of correlants which ensue from unsolved connections don't grow so large that an explanation isn't unavoidable. But we've long surpassed that point. You are all awfully comfortable ostriches. I'm afraid the tenure of your heads in the sand is close to termination, unfortunately for you.

'Wake up sheeple', huh? How will it be terminated? How is a bunch of ned kids connected to Cuntster. Dude, this is idiotic and you know it.

 

[Autphag]

'Wake up sheeple', huh? How will it be terminated? How is a bunch of ned kids connected to Cuntster. Dude, this is idiotic and you know it.

Note that I said "Cuntster's ilk". I really didn't want to write a massive expose on how the transsexual community is structured and his epicentral role within it for the millionth time. You shouldn't be forcing me in such a predicament with purposeful ignorance.
I gave my reasoning which you flat out refuse to examine. Why be dressed as, act, and speak like a boy, only to insist you are a girl? Who taught him that -- low end council estaters with congenitally low IQs are the last individuals known for their introspection? What moral stick would exist to dissuade him from recruitment, and what material and psychosocial carrots would persuade him? Why center gender at the precipice of the conflict's raison d'être at all?

Obviously this little boy had gotten himself involved with the big guns of Britain's organized transsexualism gangsterism body.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

Clearly you want sodomized.

 

[Florence]

Note that I said "Cuntster's ilk". I really didn't want to write a massive expose on how the transsexual community is structured and his epicentral role within it for the millionth time. You shouldn't be forcing me in such a predicament with purposeful ignorance.
I gave my reasoning which you flat out refuse to examine. Why be dressed as, act, and speak like a boy, only to insist you are a girl? Who taught him that -- low end council estaters with congenitally low IQs are the last individuals known for their introspection? What moral stick would exist to dissuade him from recruitment, and what material and psychosocial carrots would persuade him? Why center gender at the precipice of the conflict's raison d'être at all?

Obviously this little boy had gotten himself involved with the big guns of Britain's organized transsexualism gangsterism body.

Clearly you've never heard of the term 'ladette'.

 

[Autphag]

Clearly you want sodomized.

Fuck off with your exo-facto bullshit. You're not even a troll at this point; my annoyance stems from your distraction, and is inconsequential to your content's immateriality.

Clearly you've never heard of the term 'ladette'.

That answers three questions. It doesn't answer the fourth and therefore back-inferrentially answers none, for that explanation is rendered void.

 

[Florence]

That answers three questions. It doesn't answer the fourth and therefore back-inferrentially answers none, for that explanation is rendered void.

Fine, an answer to the fourth question: because it triggers you.

 

[LagoonaBlue]

Fuck off with your exo-facto bullshit. You're not even a troll at this point; my annoyance stems from your distraction, and is inconsequential to your content's immateriality.

When was i ever trolling?

I tried to be your friend but you're so up your own arse you think an actual cis woman who wants to help you pass as a woman is not worthy of your time.

 

[Cuntster]

Note that I said "Cuntster's ilk". I really didn't want to write a massive expose on how the transsexual community is structured and his epicentral role within it for the millionth time. You shouldn't be forcing me in such a predicament with purposeful ignorance.
I gave my reasoning which you flat out refuse to examine. Why be dressed as, act, and speak like a boy, only to insist you are a girl? Who taught him that -- low end council estaters with congenitally low IQs are the last individuals known for their introspection? What moral stick would exist to dissuade him from recruitment, and what material and psychosocial carrots would persuade him? Why center gender at the precipice of the conflict's raison d'être at all?

Obviously this little boy had gotten himself involved with the big guns of Britain's organized transsexualism gangsterism body.

This is just more sour-grapes because you don't even come close to passing as a female. You know, if you did put any ounce of effort into actually trying to look female then maybe, just maybe, people might begin to regard you as one. You don't wear makeup, you don't wear female clothing. Tying your greasy hair in a pink elastic isn't going to make people think you're a woman, they're just going to see an unkempt male autist with a pink elastic in his mane of filth.

 

[NobleGreyHorse]

Agreed with Cuntster. It's especially funny to me that he complains the leader of the wee neds was insufficiently feminine to be considered a woman (notice his misgendering of her), while at the same time, himself being... wait for it... insufficiently feminine to be considered a woman by the man, woman, or nonbinary person in the street.

 

[Begemot]

Note that I said "Cuntster's ilk". I really didn't want to write a massive expose on how the transsexual community is structured and his epicentral role within it for the millionth time. You shouldn't be forcing me in such a predicament with purposeful ignorance.
I gave my reasoning which you flat out refuse to examine. Why be dressed as, act, and speak like a boy, only to insist you are a girl? Who taught him that -- low end council estaters with congenitally low IQs are the last individuals known for their introspection? What moral stick would exist to dissuade him from recruitment, and what material and psychosocial carrots would persuade him? Why center gender at the precipice of the conflict's raison d'être at all?

Obviously this little boy had gotten himself involved with the big guns of Britain's organized transsexualism gangsterism body.

'gangsterism'? You're clutching at straws, here, frankly. Gender is performative, you refuse to perform.

 

[Autphag]

This is just more sour-grapes because you don't even come close to passing as a female. You know, if you did put any ounce of effort into actually trying to look female then maybe, just maybe, people might begin to regard you as one. You don't wear makeup, you don't wear female clothing. Tying your greasy hair in a pink elastic isn't going to make people think you're a woman, they're just going to see an unkempt male autist with a pink elastic in his mane of filth.

Agreed with Cuntster. It's especially funny to me that he complains the leader of the wee neds was insufficiently feminine to be considered a woman (notice his misgendering of her), while at the same time, himself being... wait for it... insufficiently feminine to be considered a woman by the man, woman, or nonbinary person in the street.

You're excusing a low end neugrotypical for trying just a little, in fact even less. That's the fundamental bottom line here. I know I don't pass by the Occident's conventional standard of harlotry. Neither do most of the KPA or KWP (actually in the case of the former it's illegal to have makeup) and they're still women for all intents and purposes.

Not to be anal but I'm sure I've only ever worn white, black and purple elastics.

 

[Cuntster]

You're excusing a low end neugrotypical for trying just a little, in fact even less. That's the fundamental bottom line here. I know I don't pass by the Occident's conventional standard of harlotry. Neither do most of the KPA or KWP (actually in the case of the former it's illegal to have makeup) and they're still women for all intents and purposes.

Not to be anal but I'm sure I've only ever worn white, black and purple elastics.

Your "standard of harlotry" spiel is just a strawman argument. I'm not inferring there is a specific stereotype you need to adhere to, I'm implying there's a certain standard you need to meet to pass. You don't meet that standard nor do you come close to it. There are males out there that look infinitely more feminine than you without hormones. Why? Genetics plays a part but even beyond that is the pride and work they put into their appearance and presentation. It takes time, it takes effort, it takes learning and it takes skill. You haven't put one iota of effort into becoming remotely womanlike, and that's because you don't take it seriously. And more to the point you don't take it seriously because you're not legitimately transgender. You don't actually feel like a female, you just want to be one because somewhere in that rattled brain of yours it makes sense or seems like a good idea. Your desire stems from a logical place, not an emotional one.

I know I come back to this again and again but Haselgrove innately understood that you were trying to inappropriately adopt female characteristic due to some conscious will to be a female, not because of real gender dysphoria. You did a poor job of feigning dysphoria and Angela picked up on that immediately because she's spent a good part of her life learning how people operate on a psychological level. She's not some troll on the internet trying to push your buttons, she's a medical professional with years of training. I dare say on paper her observations and record of what you presented to her makes it very, very clear to anyone that your "gender dysphoria" is nothing more than an act.

That's what angered you the most I think; that a "femalewhore" saw through your ruse so clearly and so quickly. Instead of walking out triumphantly with a script for hormones that you know you shouldn't have, you were exposed and your flimsy story completely debunked. And this it what will happen again and again because frankly, you're so arrogant and have such an over-inflated opinion of your intelligence you'll present the same bullshit act/story over and over again with the same results. You don't deserve proper hormone replacement (especially not sponsored by the state); not because of your social status, or autism, or political beliefs but for the simple reason that you're not actually gender dysphoric.

 

[Autphag]

Your "standard of harlotry" spiel is just a strawman argument. I'm not inferring there is a specific stereotype you need to adhere to, I'm implying there's a certain standard you need to meet to pass. You don't meet that standard nor do you come close to it. There are guys out there you can look infinitely more feminine than you without hormones. Why? Genetics plays a part but even beyond that is the pride and work they put into their appearance and presentation. It takes time, it takes effort, it takes learning and it takes skill. You haven't put one iota of effort into becoming remotely womanlike, and I think it's because you don't really take it seriously. And more to the point I don't think you take it seriously because you're not legitimately transgender. You don't actually feel like a female, you just want to be one because somewhere in that rattled brain of yours it makes sense or seems like a good idea. Your desire stems from a logical place, not an emotional one.

I know I come back to this again and again but Haselgrove innately understood that you were trying to inappropriately adopt female characteristic due to some conscious will to be a female, not because of real gender dysphoria. You did a poor job of feigning dysphoria and Angela picked up on that immediately because she's spent a good part of her life learning how people operate on a psychological level. She's not some troll on the internet trying to push your buttons, she's a medical professional with years of training. I dare say on paper her observations and record of what you presented to her makes it very, very clear to anyone that your "gender dysphoria" is nothing more than an act.

That's what angered you the most I think; that a "femalewhore" saw through your ruse so clearly and so quickly. Instead of walking out triumphantly with a script for hormones that you know you shouldn't have, you were exposed and your flimsy story completely debunked. And this it what will happen again and again because frankly, you're so arrogant and have such an over-inflated opinion of your intelligence you'll present the same bullshit act/story over and over again with the same results. You don't deserve proper hormone replacement (especially not sponsored by the state); not because of your social status, or autism, or political beliefs but for the simple reason that you're not actually gender dysphoric.

You're the one continuously strawmanning my motivations, which were determined by nothing you claim they were.

The other crap is an overwritten apologia for observations we don't even know exist. I only ever hear you attribute them to her. Then follow ad hominem attacks.

I mean, why even come from the emotional angle, utterly bereft of the experience of them, being a negroid sociopath? You're like a blind man writing about music notation: there's nothing about the emotional qualia in the specific you can observe, which I've noted time and again in your restatement of this stale argument. The only emotion I, introman and other nonsociopaths have ever felt coning from you is aggression; if it was due to our lack of empathy, too, the share of the hostility wouldn't be so unilateral as to come nearly exclusively from you, which it has.

 

[Cuntster]

You're the one continuously strawmanning my motivations, which were determined by nothing you claim they were.

The other crap is an overwritten apologia for observations we don't even know exist. I only ever hear you attribute them to her. Then follow ad hominem attacks.

So what's stopping you from going out right now and getting a decent dress and some cheap makeup and turning yourself into something slightly more female looking? Shouldn't someone who is it internally female want to present themselves so the outside matches the inside? Or do you just want to be "female" without changing a thing and have everyone go along with your ridiculous act?

You're as terrible as the SJW idiots who claim to be gender fluid then get upset when people don't follow along with their inane bullshit act.

I mean, why even come from the emotional angle, utterly bereft of the experience of them, being a negroid sociopath? You're like a blind man writing about music notation: there's nothing about the emotional qualia in the specific you can observe, which I've noted time and again in your restatement of this stale argument. The only emotion I, introman and other nonsociopaths have ever felt coning from you is aggression; if it was due to our lack of empathy, too, the share of the hostility wouldn't be so unilateral as to come nearly exclusively from you, which it has.

Why come from an emotional angle? Because being trapped in the wrong gender is inherently traumatic and disconcerting. The very feeling of being male in a female body or vice versa will cause emotional trauma by necessity. A feeling you've never experienced I might add. Your questioning on the matter proves it.