Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
Sep 15, 2020
Terminated
Apr 22, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Aug 6, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Aug 6, 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
May 15, 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
Apr 28, 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
Apr 25, 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
Oct 26, 2021
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
Oct 15, 2023
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 11)
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010936535
Oct 15, 2023
Case termination for opinion
10010794067
Jan 5, 2023
[10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785
Jan 2, 2023
[10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728
Dec 1, 2022
[10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140
Nov 30, 2022
[10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Terminated
Jun 10, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Oct 16, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Oct 16, 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
Oct 15, 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469
Apr 13, 2026
MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Does Hardin REALLY have to respond to all that shit Greer just wrote? Its all pure lunacy. Greer can't be bothered to just go to the court house and have them print out what he needs? The defense has to pay for the Plaintiffs own production costs? The court should have seen that the documents he brought up in his own motion are actually not relevant, despite him saying they are? Come on Greer.
I feel like at this point Hardin could just respond with "Plaintiff talks like a fag and his shit is all retarded", and that will do the job.
This May 29th development sharply contrasts with the May 6th order, as this Court was
unaware that retrieving the documents would be an $87.000 endeavor. Plaintiff would sincerely
ask this Court to Order Defendants to pay for the cost of retrieving the documents before he pays
to get the documents or that since this has turned into more cost than the Court realized it would,
Honestly, I'm almost on the side of Mr. Hardin simply ignoring it and filing his status report at 12:01AM on the 4th saying "Greer has not provided a copy of the requested document."
He should ignore it and just file the status report, which is due "on or before June 10th". Hit Greer and the Magistrate with that report at 9:01 June 4th and lock in the sanctions.
If the Court is going to rule on this stupidity in Greer's favor in the next day, nothing Hardin writes would've pierced the tard-shield anyway.
His further mewling that his "savings" is "strictly for business" reinforces my suspicion that it is actually owned and controlled by Mom and Dad. A safety net to tey and prevent their adopted retard from living in his car again. But it almost certainly comes with restrictions on its use. Dear Old Dad likely told him "no more lawsuits!" And he can't touch the money for lawsuits or hookers. (And we know this, unless he lied to the court again regarding $5000, because he hasn't spent it on hookers)
I could have sworn I heard of someone else in this case that was accused of something similar once... who could it have been...
Oh, I remember! It was Rusty stating that he was the one trying to do this to Null and that was the entire reason he pursued this case!
Oh, what cruel irony!
Also, shitlips, if it's a personal bank account, that's YOUR money, not the business's. A business has a commercial account that cannot be treated like a personal piggy bank. You are literally not allowed to mix personal and business funds in a single personal account and call only some of it "business funds" it doesn't work that way. So, that is NOT business money, that is just your personal savings. Cough it up, retard.
Ah, yes... the Motion for Reconsideration stage, my favorite part of any IFP Pro Se litigation.
There really ought to be a statutory provision that if your Motion for Reconsideration is unsuccessful, you owe attorney fees for any response by opposing parties. Too many try to treat it as a mulligan.
Ah, yes... the Motion for Reconsideration stage, my favorite part of any IFP Pro Se litigation.
There really ought to be a statutory provision that if your Motion for Reconsideration is unsuccessful, you owe attorney fees for any response by opposing parties. Too many try to treat it as a mulligan.
I'm hopeful that when this stupidity results in more sanctions that the court allows Hardin to include all the extra BS and doesn't reduce the bill this time.
This is the type of student in my class where I would force drop them. It's a very rare thing professors can do, but if they can demonstrate a pattern of misconduct, similar to what Rusty has done in this trial, the professor can administratively drop you from the course, and you don't get a refund for it.
It would really suck if there were documents showing that he spent several hundred dollars registering a new LLC recently, specifically between the time that the court reminded Greer once again that he had to produce these documents and him begging for (and receiving) an extension to produce them. That might look terrible to the court.
Have you seen how much trouble it is to get him to produce a document that he authored and submitted to a court? Now you expect him to get some kind of doctor's note!
Ah, yes... the Motion for Reconsideration stage, my favorite part of any IFP Pro Se litigation.
There really ought to be a statutory provision that if your Motion for Reconsideration is unsuccessful, you owe attorney fees for any response by opposing parties. Too many try to treat it as a mulligan.
Can you really blame him when it FUCKING WORKS? Last time he tried it he got a nice $4000 discount on his sanctions bill for no good reason. Greer is just the symptom, the courts are the disease.
Also, shitlips, if it's a personal bank account, that's YOUR money, not the business's. A business has a commercial account that cannot be treated like a personal piggy bank. You are literally not allowed to mix personal and business funds in a single personal account and call only some of it "business funds" it doesn't work that way.
It's called co-mingling of funds. Depending on how he set things up with his business and how he pays for things, it might actually be an illegal breach of fiduciary duty.
"How does Russ breach duty to a company that's just him?" Well, you might recall his latest LLC has WH listed as well. Whoever this mysterious co-manager is, he has a right to honest finances with his interests. Russ also claims he has investors, who should be able to demand fiduciary duty from him as well.
Forget delays or sanctions, we are at the point where Russ is admitting to potential crimes with every new filing.
Difference being, Russell getting his documents will cost him $70. Every time Matthew Hardin scratches his arse, it costs Null hundreds and hundreds of dollars.
If these judges don't grab Greer by the testicles and empty out the whole of his whore fund in sanctions for this bullshit, I'm going to be furious.
I remember him "proving" it once by showing a chopped and cropped and redacted prescription for an antidepressant.
He tried to crop and edit the prescription to make it look like it was prescribed for PTSD caused by Taylor Swift but ended up accidentally doxing his parents' address on the bottle and revealing he was basically given a trial size of the lowest possible dosage IIRC.