Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
I think iota is conflating the threatening email Greer sent Hardin with the RO application which is due tomorrow and will not be appearing here under threat of US Marshalls.
Pity, I was looking forward to a visit from Raylan Givens. I hear he's quite the shitposter.
 
Pity, I was looking forward to a visit from Raylan Givens. I hear he's quite the shitposter.

I've just finished re-reading the novels. Elmore Leonard really was a master when it came to cowboy stories and crime fiction and the Givens books combine both genres.

The TV dramatizations were fantastic as well. If you haven't watched them, I strongly recommend. The first two seasons are a real treat.
 
iota, I’m a bit confused about this. Mr. Hardin said this would happen in his email to Mr. Greer, but I couldn’t find any info in the SPO about automatic ‘de-designation’. Can you help me out?

The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
 
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
Ah. Yes, reviewing the prior SPO, this explanation checks out. Thank you!
 
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
I'm fairly certain the rather overt criminality that was the nature of the communication Shitlips sent puts it outside the SPO as well.
 
I'm fairly certain the rather overt criminality that was the nature of the communication Shitlips sent puts it outside the SPO as well.
The SPO doesn't remotely apply anyway, even if it were a settlement offer in good faith.
2025-06-02_10-19.webp
Even if it did apply it should be obvious that a lawyer can't answer a settlement offer without being able to show it to his client.
 
"The jury finds that the weather was quite pleasant today."
How Beautifully Blue the sky
The glass is rising very high
Continue fine I hope it may
And yet it rained but yesterday
Tomorrow it may pour again
I hear the country wants some rain
Yet people say
I know not why
That we shall have a warm July.....
 
In hindsight, Josh's decision to not appeal the transfer of the case back to Utah from Florida was a mistake. [...]
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that is only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
 
Last edited:
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
The main reason it got sent back to Florida is that they did not want to deal with that shit and they knew they could get away with it despite being procedurally in the wrong.
 
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
First, SIR, it's TardGuard™ thank you very much, don't make this an abuse of trademark case, too.

Second, the TardGuard™ really only applies to about half of the courtshit - those where the "harmed" party is (in theory) the court itself, so it can be lenient - I'm talking missing deadlines, filing badly, IPF®, etc.

The other half is stuff that harms the case or the defendants (and even here they minimize but cannot remove) - especially once in discovery, TardGuard™ is about as effective as perfume as bear spray.

The court apparently operates under a legal fiction that everything BEFORE discovery is "free" (or mostly so) for both parties, and so financial harm is minimized, but once discovery starts, the court admits that shit costs money, yo.
 
I cannot believe he is so deliberately misunderstanding that he himself needs to mark the documents before he himself produces them to Hardin.

Also, did you know he’s depressed and anxious and that excuses any deadline he’s ever missed?

e. “He has a savings account but that is reserved for business” my brother in Slaanesh how is this lawsuit not about your entertainment business
 
Back
Top Bottom