Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
Sep 15, 2020
Terminated
Apr 22, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Aug 6, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Aug 6, 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
May 15, 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
Apr 28, 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
Apr 25, 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
Oct 26, 2021
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
Oct 15, 2023
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 11)
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010936535
Oct 15, 2023
Case termination for opinion
10010794067
Jan 5, 2023
[10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785
Jan 2, 2023
[10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728
Dec 1, 2022
[10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140
Nov 30, 2022
[10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Terminated
Jun 10, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Oct 16, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Oct 16, 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
Oct 15, 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469
Apr 13, 2026
MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026)
I think iota is conflating the threatening email Greer sent Hardin with the RO application which is due tomorrow and will not be appearing here under threat of US Marshalls.
I've just finished re-reading the novels. Elmore Leonard really was a master when it came to cowboy stories and crime fiction and the Givens books combine both genres.
The TV dramatizations were fantastic as well. If you haven't watched them, I strongly recommend. The first two seasons are a real treat.
iota, I’m a bit confused about this. Mr. Hardin said this would happen in his email to Mr. Greer, but I couldn’t find any info in the SPO about automatic ‘de-designation’. Can you help me out?
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
The SPO doesn't remotely apply anyway, even if it were a settlement offer in good faith.
Even if it did apply it should be obvious that a lawyer can't answer a settlement offer without being able to show it to his client.
How Beautifully Blue the sky
The glass is rising very high
Continue fine I hope it may
And yet it rained but yesterday
Tomorrow it may pour again
I hear the country wants some rain
Yet people say
I know not why
That we shall have a warm July.....
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that is only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
The main reason it got sent back to Florida is that they did not want to deal with that shit and they knew they could get away with it despite being procedurally in the wrong.
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
First, SIR, it's TardGuard™ thank you very much, don't make this an abuse of trademark case, too.
Second, the TardGuard™ really only applies to about half of the courtshit - those where the "harmed" party is (in theory) the court itself, so it can be lenient - I'm talking missing deadlines, filing badly, IPF®, etc.
The other half is stuff that harms the case or the defendants (and even here they minimize but cannot remove) - especially once in discovery, TardGuard™ is about as effective as perfume as bear spray.
The court apparently operates under a legal fiction that everything BEFORE discovery is "free" (or mostly so) for both parties, and so financial harm is minimized, but once discovery starts, the court admits that shit costs money, yo.