This is a special case, though.. I hung out with a lot of dumb people as a teenager, and did a lot of dumb things, and even among people whose illustrious futures involved things like prison for burglary, it was well fucking understood that nitrous was the lowest of the low. It was the drug equivalent of picking cigarette stubs out of public ashtrays. Huge shame stigma
Yes, Nick is dumber than dumb.
I guess being fucked up 24/7 has trashed the irony processing part of his brain.
View attachment 7432909
archive
He's so lame.
It is my belief Sean is offering a legal opinion, and not some philosophical one. He said "I don't think you can," instead of something like "I wish you wouldn't be able to."
Again, I'm searching for legal authority. "Should" isn't legal authority, even when it's correct. It's clear that Kandiyohi County's position is that "not accepted" removes it from being automatically public. Why do they believe so? I don't know (though I understand the theory), and I haven't seen anything definitive on that point. Depends on what "presented" is interpreted to mean. If they're way off-base, and "presented" doesn't require a formal offer live in court, and excising certain exhibits from the record is improper, great!
But the man is right here. He even responded to one of your posts just recently saying that he believes the two bodycams were introduced into evidence. If you wish to debate him, feel free.
I did respond to him. I'm not debating; I'm looking for concrete support for either position.
You asked me who proffered such an opinion, and I said Sean, while directing you towards his argument.
Arguments are arguments, and I appreciate Sean's experience. It's not personal; I'm asking questions and would be pleased to see authority for confidence that the Order as complete bullshit. But I won't do it out of emotion, because that gives no clear sense of where things might end up.
Even saying that what was done actually constitutes an "administrative error"
What else is it that they were marked as received when they weren't? That's not even a matter of whether they were presented or offered into evidence. The Court did not acknowledge them as received/ accepted/ admitted, and specifically called out in its Order individual exhibits, which group did not include these.
is somewhat a reaching conclusion and is accepting perhaps more of the argument made by the locals than is necessary.
I suspect you understand that doing that is part of the assignment.
It can be argued that this is as much about disorganization among the defense team and their own incompetence
God, yes. As I said above, White should have taken steps to remove the things as he said he would (or at least check to confirm everything was done as expected), and he obviously did not. Slack. This shouldn't be a 2025 issue.
as it is any kind of administrative error. There are certainly all sorts of legal errors that cannot be corrected after the fact.
Of course. But is this one?
There is an equal amount of question over under what legal authority the judge took this action. Its more than unusual in the courts for a judge to consider something as evidence,
Where did that happen?
release as evidence to a public audience and then suddenly change his mind very quickly after the fact. An argument can be made that what was done goes against the spriit of the law concerning the records.
Possibly. But the transcript and Order from last year support - imperfectly and incompletely, no question - a counterargument.
Just for clarity, she is a thot who poured chocolate syrup all over her exposed skin during a stream to please her "special interest" fans who apparently are into people who look like they are covered in literal shit.
I'd be embarrassed for him if I didnt think that water found its own level.
