💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Telvanni]

Nick I know you're reading this.
Josh DM'd me and said if you posted the bodycam first and "Fucking steal my glory" he would fall in a deep depression.
Sign off on the body cam being released; Josh would never recover.

 

[Doug S]

The Cops are hiding the missing coke. Plus the terrible handling of detaining Nick in his car. Allowing him to hide drugs, in the area of his child AND not searching the car after the arrest.

This coupled with all of Nick's wild statements about the event. The bodycam footage IS a matter of public interest.

I wonder if the court would see this as a legitimate angle (I hope they would). Police are publicly accused of impropriety and the body cam can either prove that or exonerate them. But then the sheriff decides to stand in the way? It makes it seem like the allegations have merit.

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

where did this happen?

Kandiyohi was ordered by a judge to release the footage and now they're in damage control. The sheriff outright said he did not intend to comply with the judge's order until a local big law firm sent him a letter, and they have the clout in the state to actually intimidate.

We then asked the Department of Administration to rule and they also issued an opinion that the sheriff should comply. He said he would decide that to do on the 2nd.

Now, the prosecutor is jumping in to help. Seems like the county conspiracy does exist, but not to hurt that poor little crackhead.

 

[Captain Manning]

Is this all happening because the courthouse staff are sick of dealing with people coming in to watch it?

If that were the case, they would want it released on the Internet, so that people wouldn't keep going down to the damn courthouse (or wherever) to view it.

 

[Sam Losco]

I think the real reason crackets is seething so hard isn’t just because it’ll embarrass him, he’s beyond shame at this point. I think the real reason is because he lied to his parents about what happened/ the state of his house and when his parents see he’s a faggot liar and how bad his drug den looked when he said it wasn’t that bad, it’s going to cause him a bunch of shit with them.

His parents already know. They are enablers.

 

[Pedophobe]

There is only one logical solution to the problem. As with other movies, first in theaters, then on streaming services.

Nick was always destined to star in a Netflix documentary series.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

I doubt his deathly expression was over the bodycam.

 

[Folgers Can]

It wasn't admitted into evidence. They were uploaded to MNDES in anticipation of their being evidence...
...
https://www.mncourts.gov/Help-Topics/Evidence-and-Exhibits.aspx The guidance references a "hearing," not a trial, and contemplates exactly the scenario of uploading but not being admitted into evidence.

Even assuming arguendo that the bumbling statements in that transcript didn't result in the footage being admitted into evidence, I fail to see the relevance when the superseding statute pertinent to investigative data in particular doesn't hinge on what was admitted, and what matters is what was presented:


[L]

Why wouldn't a MNDES upload of the exhibit, memorandum footnotes citing it in support of your motion's argument, and a transcript's initial discussion of it as one of your exhibits collectively count as presenting it, even if he subsequently wanted to "get rid of it" or it subsequently was not admitted? Without any statutory definitions section or any appellate direction on the definition of "presented" in this unique context, Hardin should be free to go straight to the Webster's definition and contend that the MNDES upload and the memorandum filing were the point of no return.

 

[4090 Chad]

His parents already know. They are enablers.

We sure? As far as I am aware, they only “know” what their crackhead failson tells them and of course they would want to believe him because they love their child and probably don’t want to imagine they raised a complete fuck up who lets his own kids get into his coke stash.

 

[BoysOfTheNYPDChoir]

Eric Tollefson is currently running for Sherrif, and I expect to see a $10,000 donation on his campaign by Bob and Celeste. A Jon Tollefson previously ran for state auditor. All I know is that we need to get to the bottom of what's happening in Kandiyohi county.

The two are completely unrelated. "Tollefson" is a common Scandinavian name.

We will know more in the coming months, specifically around the winter. 2026 is the major statewide election year here and in most of the country.

 

[Butt_Pouncer]

I think the real reason crackets is seething so hard isn’t just because it’ll embarrass him, he’s beyond shame at this point. I think the real reason is because he lied to his parents about what happened/ the state of his house and when his parents see he’s a faggot liar and how bad his drug den looked when he said it wasn’t that bad, it’s going to cause him a bunch of shit with them.

His parents cleaned up his house after the arrest.

 

[Pedophobe]

If that were the case, they would want it released on the Internet, so that people wouldn't keep going down to the damn courthouse (or wherever) to view it.

If it's no longer in the court record it ceases to be their problem regardless.

Assuming it's even possible to remove it from the record, even if this motion is accepted, as SEAN discussed.

This whole situation seems very silly.

 

[Steamboat Captain]

We sure? As far as I am aware, they only “know” what their crackhead failson tells them and of course they would want to believe him because they love their child and probably don’t want to imagine they raised a complete fuck up who lets his own kids get into his coke stash.

As someone who was married with a kid and lived in the same town as my in-laws I'm gonna say there is nearly a 0% chance they don't know the state of the house. Your family comes over, often unannounced

 

[Brian Oblivion]

It wasn't admitted into evidence. They were uploaded to MNDES in anticipation of their being evidence, and you can request to have non-admitted materials removed. Frank White indicated he's put them there by saying he'd get rid of them*, so he should have requested deletion (account owner can request), but guess it wasn't important for that legal eagle. OR the stupid FAQ below is ambiguous, bc it references a deleting items in a "pre-hearing" status even after a hearing has occurred, so maybe it stays that status if not admitted.


https://www.mncourts.gov/Help-Topics/Evidence-and-Exhibits.aspx The guidance references a "hearing," not a trial, and contemplates exactly the scenario of uploading but not being admitted into evidence.

For me the big wrinkle with this issue is that the statute specifies "presented as evidence" rather than "admitted into evidence". I think generally these statutes contemplate the public having a somewhat broader access to materials than what a jury is or would be ultimately going to see at trial.

The other part of this, as I previously mentioned, is that this issue may actually be moot at the district court level as both a judge and the highest level state administrative body have already ruled that the bodycam footage was "presented as evidence in court" meaning that, under the doctrine of res judicata/collateral estoppel, the judge in Nick's criminal case no longer has the authority to rule on this issue and that if Nick wants to challenge the rulings in favor of releasing the footage the only avenue available at this point is to file an appeal with the appeals court.

 

[Captain Manning]

Why wouldn't a MNDES upload of the exhibit, memorandum footnotes citing it in support of your motion's argument, and a transcript's initial discussion of it as one of your exhibits collectively count as presenting it, even if he subsequently wanted to "get rid of it" or it subsequently was not admitted? Without any statutory definitions section or any appellate direction on the definition of "presented" in this unique context, Hardin should be free to go straight to the Webster's definition and contend that the MNDES upload and the memorandum filing were the point of no return.

I have a feeling both Null and Sean are right, and Hardin will write a very good motion.

I especially hope Hardin mentions Null getting a ruling from the Minnesota Department of Administration that the Sheriff needs to release the fucking thing.

What the prosecutor and White are doing here is greasy AF, and should not be permitted. They are trying to rewrite the record, in an effort to do an end run around that, and deny the public their right to a record they are entitled to. Fuck that.

 

[parsnip]

Nick should just gather up all drugs he can find, get absolutely wrecked, and stream the footage himself. Go out in a blaze of glory and show all of us kiwi chuds that he's not scared of anyone.

 

[800 Chupacabras]

Even with the worst case scenario where the footage is withheld, it’s important to remember Rekieta squanders every advantage he gets. I could foresee an outcome where he gets the footage withheld, then crashes and burns in the celebration. No bad outcomes from this situation, only better ones.

 

[Optavia Sales Rep]

Bob and Celeste helped clean up the Balldo Bunker after the kids were placed with other family IIRC. Nick has always been a slob, I doubt his parents were surprised at the state of the house.

 

[Das Kätzchen]

Someone's not happy.
View attachment 7428287
archive

1. Null doesn't initiate contact with Nicholas Rekieta, to my knowledge.
2. Null, as I understand, is not a homosexual and has refused homosexual advances.
3. Whether Null is addicted to shota is unknown, but I'd wager a guess that he has no interest in pornographic materials involving little boys.
4. Null has bradycardia, and I personally don't remember him getting agitated, other than muttering "retard nigger" under his breath on a stream years ago.
5. Null has both wins and losses under his belt, and in a perpetual war on retards. Ice cream state undetermined.

On the other hand...
1. Nicholas Rekieta is the originator of "shower texts" in the middle of the night, trying to talk to Internet people who he considered his friends.
2. Nicholas Rekieta has admitted to homosexual relationship with Aaron Imholte, and by his own admission, the homosexual relationship was consensual at first, changing into a forceful and non-consensual one after Aaron showed him his place as the bottom bitch. Transitioning would be par for the course, but for the pressure from Nicholas' community and family and the possible fallout from living his true self.
3. Nicholas Rekieta is openly friends with admitted pedophiles, such as Mapton and Vito. That is not to say that Nicholas Rekieta has had his pornography interests affected in some way related to their interests, but Nicholas' coomer past and present, his preference in porn actresses, and the trajectory of his degenerate actions doesn't inspire confidence.
4. Just recently Nicholas Rekieta was red in the face and screaming so loud his mic cut out while talking to a woman who disagreed with him. Textbook nigger behavior.
5. Nicholas Rekieta has had every motion in his criminal case DENIED, and that's without looking at his other escapades. Ice cream definitely melting on the ground.

Confession through projection or is his brain more holes than matter? You decide.

 

[Rotollo 2]

Okay, Eric Tollefson, you and I need to have words.
View attachment 7428290
(That's a joke. No one is touching anyone, cow or not.)

he looks like a multiverseal variant of if balldo became sheriff balldo