💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 157 22.5%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    697
two theories:
1) it's unrelated. the chance of two things being unrelated---one worth golating about, like the favorable move by the prosecutor, one worth dreading, like pissing hot or divorce or PO troubles or whatever people are theorizing---happening at the same time are i think pretty low.
2) the motion is only a partial win for rekieta. he asked for a mile from the prosecutor and only got an inch. whatever the prosecutor says in that motion is ALL he has on his side to fight against its release (or sue after the fact). so he could be pissed because he asked for an ironclad solution but the prosecutor's amendment is only a half measure that might not work.
Decent analysis, but got to disagree that the odds of him accidentally pissing hot is "pretty low". That's the kind of thing that could literally wildcard its way in on any given day for old Rickety Rackets.
 
Nick accusing someone else of throwing tantrums is hilarious. Nigger you popped an artery over an AI voice less than a week ago lmao.
 
View attachment 7428527
(L/A)
Nick's cope stream tomorrow must be recorded. Please.
"Null's voice cracks" - :really:

It really is so joever, Kiwibros. There is absolutely no chance of recovery from this completely original insult. The court will have no choice but to refuse the release of the bodycam footage because of nool's squeaky voice now :bossman:
 
So why did Rekieta seem so agitated when he ended the stream earlier?
The county seems keen to block the bodycams which seems like good news for him unless I'm misunderstanding something.
Do we know the timeline of the legal back and forth with the sheriff blocking it and then being told to release it? Because the way I've taken the events it seems Nick got the news the judge was forcing them to move forward releasing it. So his agitation is him realising his win is a ticking clock.
 
I'm leaning towards the DA trying to keep it hidden for purely local PR reasons. They don't want CandyYoshi's Beaver Cleaverville Minnesota Nice image further sullied by association with a gay child-abusing cuckold ex-lawyer, let alone by way of the Autistic Illuminati gangstalker forum.
 
I really can't imagine that there would be evidence of malfeasance on the bodycam footage.
Rekieta and his lawyer would presumably have reviewed the footage pre-omnibus. If there was clear evidence of wrongdoing or procedural failures from the police, they would have hammered on this ages ago. As it is, most of Rekietas protests have amounted to little more than impotent whining.
Perhaps there could be evidence of unprofessional conduct from officers in the videos that the police would prefer not to be disclosed (ie, making comments on the mess, making disparaging comments about drug addicts, etc.) but if there was anything that was seriously wrong with the police conduct in the videos, we would have heard about it long ago.

It would seem more likely that the hesitancy to release the footage is a personal decision.

Some options to consider:
- Doing a favor for Rekieta (or someone else with an interest to protect Rekieta).
- Personal conviction to not want to embarrass someone further (unlikely since almost all police action risks embarrassing someone, however considering this is a smaller community with multiple children involved maybe not so unlikely).
- Abundance of caution (if the sheriff is known to be a cautious person they may prefer to defer a decision like this until there are no possible question marks over the order).

My hope is for the abundance of caution option, since that will likely result in a positive outcome for release of the footage after resolution of the matter.
 
Decent analysis, but got to disagree that the odds of him accidentally pissing hot is "pretty low". That's the kind of thing that could literally wildcard its way in on any given day for old Rickety Rackets.
yes, but the chances of him pissing hot AND getting a major win re: bodycam on the same day? simple probability suggests otherwise.

i still say he didn't get all of what he wanted re: prosecutors motion and is terrified that what they did won't be good enough to prevent its release.

Edit:

i mean, to nominally say, "hey, we tried, you're welcome to sue us after the release if you think we violated your constitutional rights", is essentially a middle finger to nick. suing after the fact will not get the footage un-released.
 
Now, the prosecutor is jumping in to help. Seems like the county conspiracy does exist, but not to hurt that poor little crackhead
They’re not protecting Nick, they’re protecting themselves. This video is damning not to a neglectful alcoholic who didn’t give a fuck until he got caught, but to the sheriffs and DHS of Kandiyohi, who let this retard make an ass of their little town in the middle of fucking nowhere. The last thing they want is YouTube channels like EWU to broadcast this colossally embarrassing fuck up to the world.
 
1748570829133.webp
(L/A)

He is so close to a full-on Patpost:
Enjoy✅
Prison⛔
Child✅
 
This is taking an extremely entertaining turn. Let's keep going and see what happens because this is feeling like a "best future" sort of outcome.

Tomorrow is another day.
 
Back
Top Bottom