💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.7%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 40.1%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 163 23.7%

  • Total voters
    688

Why did you let the nanny to continue to be the nanny if you found out she was drunk while watching the kids?​

The thing about any recollection Nick has about anything during this time period is he was drunk and high. If she really was drinking it's doubtful she was as smashed as Nick and maybe Nick encouraged her to drink booze from the liquor cabinet. Maybe it never happened and it's cope.
Nick is probably sweating the Toe's claim that the police are investigating harassment against Chaney.
That too, you know that Nick at least hit on her if not asked her to join the polycule or overshared what was going on in his personal life (all count as workplace harassment)
 
The thing about any recollection Nick has about anything during this time period is he was drunk and high. If she really was drinking it's doubtful she was as smashed as Nick and maybe Nick encouraged her to drink booze from the liquor cabinet. Maybe it never happened and it's cope.
I fully expect that Nick (and Kayla) tried talking Chaney into a threesome.
Nick could not have that woman in his house and not constantly hit on her.
 
WTF can this nigger just don't do anything for a week? The body cam footage has to be so disastrous for the rest of his reputation and the literal cattle still watching him, that his wet brain can't help but blame it on his nanny.

I can't imagine how bad the Balldo crypt must be. *grammar
 
Screenshot_20250522-112443.webp


Nick: "I never blamed anyone else for the cocaine"
Also Nick when he first got busted with cocaine in his house: "You never know what the police will bring into your house..."
 
Last edited:
The long, long pause where you can hear his perforated gray cells coming up with a lie is modern Nick in microcosm.
Without wading too deeply into the area of behavioral 'tells' and eye movements that investigators use to detect lying...
Another one I noticed was Nick responding to the superchat calling bullshit on the nanny story. He repeated the question back once or twice. That's another sign someone is lying by giving themselves a few seconds to come up with something. It's less obvious than pausing or filling the gaps with um's and uh's.
 
Another one I noticed was Nick responding to the superchat calling bullshit on the nanny story. He repeated the question back once or twice. That's another sign someone is lying by giving themselves a few seconds to come up with something. It's less obvious than pausing or filling the gaps with um's and uh's.
Definitely. Nick's biggest 'tells' in lying are in his speech patterns. Eye patterns, head tilting, etc. are much harder to decipher.

Lying or not, when a story is harder to tell, there are more pausing words (ums, uhs, like, whatever, y'know) and - in Nick's case - often laughing for effect and distance. His nanny story was FILLED with those.

My guess? Nick doesn't know the truth, but is warping whatever his daughter has said to serve his current narrative.

In January and February (the months in question), Nick was on a full-scale coke, ketamine, and alcohol bender. None of his memories are reliable.

Now? He has a pre-teen girl feeding her father with stories that serve him. That's hardly surprising for anyone who has known a 12 yo girl. She is probably happy to be back home after a stage of turmoil while looking for Daddy's approval.
 
Another scenario that is more likely than whatever Nick has cooked up.

View attachment 7396651
[Archive]
Nick called THAT insane, at this point i believe that story, if the entire story about the kids isnt made up by nick in the first place.
Also thanks for BTFO'ing us this morning Nick, really thought you had it in you to continue doubling down blaming the nanny. Though denying he ever blamed the cocaine possession on anyone is a weird diversion in the path.
 
With regards to the Twitter theory that his kids were selling alcohol: I find it hard to believe that Nick, who once had 26 bottles of whiskey within arms reach of his streaming chair, would notice some missing bottles.

On the other hand, his actions show that alcohol was more important than his family at that point in time, so perhaps he did use his rapidly declining mental faculties to inventory his precious booze.
 
and then there's nick
Nick was/is totally oblivious to anything and anyone in his household. Then and now.
Nick can't tell you about the Nanny quitting or being fired or just disappearing from his reality.
Because he doesn't know.
He doesn't have any knowledge.
He has no awareness.
Checked out.
Gonzo.

Don't do drugs, kids.
 
If you have teenaged kids and a lot of alcohol, missing alcohol is believable. I'm sure many of us oldfags remember shenanigans involving disappearing bottles from the back of the liquor cabinet. On the other hand, our parents weren't alcoholics and so those bottles weren't moving constantly.
 
If you have teenaged kids and a lot of alcohol, missing alcohol is believable. I'm sure many of us oldfags remember shenanigans involving disappearing bottles from the back of the liquor cabinet. On the other hand, our parents weren't alcoholics and so those bottles weren't moving constantly.
entirely believable:
In fact, the American Addiction Centers Resource (AACR) states that first-degree relatives of someone with a history of addiction are between 4 to 8 times more likely to develop problems with addiction themselves when compared to those who do not have a family member with an addiction.
also sounds familiar:
One of the big problems, Drzewoszewski warns, is that some families try to hide the addict or even dismiss the disease. “Addiction teaches the family three rules: don’t talk, don’t trust and don’t feel—as we must protect the family secret,” he says. “By doing this, though, families don’t learn how to properly cope.”
source
 
Plus it's quite clear from Nick's abuse that his kids are developmentally stunted and I doubt the drugged up daughter could actually make up a story that detailed.
Or even worse, this crackhead psycho brainwashed the kid to actually believe his diseased fantasy.
 
If you have teenaged kids and a lot of alcohol, missing alcohol is believable. I'm sure many of us oldfags remember shenanigans involving disappearing bottles from the back of the liquor cabinet. On the other hand, our parents weren't alcoholics and so those bottles weren't moving constantly.
I mean it’s maybe possible Nick never had anyone steal any of his booze but he was just so much of an alcoholic he doesn’t remember how much he drank and assumed someone must’ve ran off with one of his precious bottles.
 
entirely believable:

also sounds familiar:

source
Nick to this day says that drugs are fun and basically have no physical downsides and the only reason to not do them is the big bad government hates fun and will arrest you for doing them

He's clearly given his eating disorder to his kids (they call each other fat, he doesn't feed them, they're short despite tall parents)

His daughter tested positive for coke

Nick 100% got at least some of his kids addicted
 
Back
Top Bottom