Correct me if I'm wrong but IIRC that cover only came up in two instances: first at the time of the arrest when Kayla improvidently bolstered the case for charges against April by lying about her being a live-in nanny, and secondly when Bobby "The Broom" Rekieta's sworn testimony referred to Chaney as the previous nanny in a way that everyone read to imply that April must have been the replacement nanny.
The nanny thing was a weak cover, and we all know that crackwhore April wasn't really the nanny, but it would not be beyond Nick to claim she really was if he felt it would help mitigate the damage of the bodycam.
Ask yourself this. Which one is less stupid:
1. The house looks like shit because April didn't do her nanny job?
2. The house looks like shit because Chaney didn't do her nanny job?
I mean, they are obviously BOTH stupid, but #2 is much dumber. Nobody can reasonably blame a housekeeper that quit three months previous for the state of the house.
If they're split, I would agree that
maybe he's scared of her dropping a nuke. I'd buy he's scared of something worse.
What I
don't buy is that, if they split, he feels some altruistic loyalty to her.
This is Nick Rekieta. Claiming Nick wouldn't do anything bad to somebody because of love is nauseating. He's supposed to love his wife. He's suppose to love his 8 year old. Give me a break. Nick loves nobody but himself.