Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[The Un-Clit]

What a fucking idiot. He actually went and squealed to the Daddy Judge. And in the stupidest way possible.

Russell better prepare his anus after that self-serving, smug as fuck filing.

My guess is anything from a demand order to pay the $1000 immediately or show cause why not under risk of dismissal, to full restoration of Hardins original $5000 request (and demand order etc.) to more severe sanctioning.

Either way I'm camping this thread all the rest of the day now.

 

[But I Digress]

The District court judge is not going to like being told the sanctions he gave Russ a low number on is too high and probably not appropriate. But will still tard-guard is some manner.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I imagine the fuck up that Useful found was something like Greer admitting to having a considerable amount of money, specifically an amount in publically available emails.

He has already admitted to that -multiple times- on the record.

The District court judge is not going to like being told the sanctions he gave Russ a low number on is too high and probably not appropriate. But will still tard-guard is some manner.

God willing he'll increase them.

 

[lol cow supreme]

Defenses rebuttal: "Plaintiff states sanctions were not worth $1000, and he is correct. They were worth $5700, but the court took leniency due to the plaintiff's IFP status. Defense would also like to point out that Plaintiff has given up his IFP status as it may have been a paralyzed-face sham the entire time. Further as to the sanity of my client, as Plaintiff has aptly pointed out in previous filing this is a copyright case and my clients personal life and activites has no bearing on this case. If we were to cede to Plaintiff's argument that my client is indeed insane, sanctions should be increased for Plaintiff using this court to harass and bankrupt a mentally disabled man. As to my client having no assets, it currently has sanctions of $1000 pending payment."

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Defenses rebuttal: "Plaintiff states sanctions were not worth $1000, and he is correct. They were worth $5700, but the court took leniency due to the plaintiff's IFP status. Defense would also like to point out that Plaintiff has given up his IFP status as it may have been a paralyzed-face sham the entire time. Further as to the sanity of my client, as Plaintiff has aptly pointed out in previous filing this is a copyright case and my clients personal life and activites has no bearing on this case. If we were to cede to Plaintiff's argument that my client is indeed insane, sanctions should be increased for Plaintiff using this court to harass and bankrupt a mentally disabled man. As to my client having no assets, it currently has sanctions of $1000 pending payment."

Mr. Hardin should also mention his preserved arguments inter alia the fact that he never got a chance to respond contrary to local rules.

 

[Swole McPole]

Either way I'm camping this thread all the rest of the day now.

Come on, my dude. Who among us hasn't been camped here all week now?

 

[Harvey Danger]

I'm going to catch a timeout if I keep posting the "THAT'S NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS" rant. But that's the risk of following a Greer thread.

 

[obsdj]

Oh my god. The juicy info I just received. Not sure how much I can share right now, but Russ fucked up BIG TIME.

Will this likely be something entered into the docket, hopefully soon?

ECF 304, Russ wants the a stay on paying his sanctions pending an appeal after the case is completed. He's directing this now towards the district court judge

Mr. Hardin should also mention his preserved arguments inter alia the fact that he never got a chance to respond contrary to local rules.

If I recall from the last time Greer pulled this telling-teacher stuff, Hardin cannot file a response unless the District Judge asks him to. Can he do something in the interim to draw attention to that though, such as requesting judicial notice (without doing so in the form of a response) and mentioning what happened last time, as you say?

 

[RodgerDodger]

The District court judge is not going to like being told the sanctions he gave Russ a low number on is too high and probably not appropriate. But will still tard-guard is some manner.

He might not. Hardin gets to answer this one, this time. Remember District Judge failed to let defense respond to Greers (fraudulent) pleading to lower the not yet determined Sanctions. He gets to this time. I don't want to say much more. But Hardin has clearly been expecting and is well prepared for this moment.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Greer reminds me of this classic

 

[Harvey Danger]

I would like to remind Plaintiff Russell Greer that he is citing a case that doesn't apply here. That ruling in Miami Intl vs Paynter granted a lower bond after a financial review determined Paynter could not afford a full bond. But that is not the case here, as both now and back in March, Greer claims he can pay the full amount!

I'm doing a side-by-side comparison with his original request at ECF 251, surprisingly it's not all copy-pasted. He added some sperging about Hardin's response to the original request, including the bit above pretending that subpoenas and time spent responding "did not harm Defendants". Most of the additions are a typical Greer response to someone smacking him down, anger and words that don't actually argue anything.

However he did add a new, particularly retarded section arguing a "Matter of Law that the Tenth Circuit Hasn’t Ruled On". What is this pressing, unprecedented matter of law that Greer feels is completely unexplored?

it has not be adjudicated at the 10th Circuit whether it is indeed bad faith to be hesitant to reveal information because Defendants’ run a stalking website, whose lawyer seems to be intimately involved with.

The 10th Circuit needs to also expand on whether pro se confusion with initial disclosures constitutes bad faith.

Greer's big-brained plan is to beg his 10th Appeals buddies to pat him on the head and say "there there, claiming you're scared or confused really is a get-out-of-jail free card". He's not satisfied with breaking copyright precedent, he wants his magical phrases on the books so he can hide behind them in every lawsuit from now on.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF 305

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

ECF 305View attachment 7391428

Literally the fucking Sideshow Bob rake scene at this point.

 

[Throwing Romans]

ECF 305View attachment 7391428

GOOD GOD. Hardin goes NUCLEAR.

 

[Harvey Danger]

I don't know that this warranted a snap filing by Hardin. This is all very entertaining, but maybe waiting to file it all at once, instead of a motion for extension of time, would've looked better.

Defendants have filed a growing body of evidence which indicates that Mr. Greer’s in forma pauperis status was obtained by fraud.

Boy have they.

 

[Jacknife]

Now the district judge might take his time to reply to that.

But I think we are in for some MAJOR insanity from Greer-boi.
Hardin actually snitched to Daddy district-judge and now, considering the affront this is to the Alpha Dog of the court, Greer will retaliate!

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Out of the mouths of babes and onto the eternally preserved records of litigation.

Now the district judge might take his time to reply to that.

But I think we are in for some MAJOR insanity from Greer-boi.
Hardin actually snitched to Daddy district-judge and now, considering the affront this is to the Alpha Dog of the court, Greer will retaliate!

Greer doesn't give a wooden nickel about what the judges or even his adoptive father thinks. Hardin is actively closing doors on his Brothel fantasies and that is what has Greer frothing at the mouth.

 

[Allied-Mastercomputer]

He cc’ed his brother daddy

 

[DuckofDoom]

CC'ing Greer's brother dad and Waylon Huber is such a hilarious move. I can only imagine the trauma lumps that gimpface is experiencing right now.

Edited because I'm retarded and mixed up the Greers

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

So the Defendants didn't specify the great prejudice they suffered and then in the next sentence you repeat the specifics of the prejudice they informed you they suffered?

Also, your opponent does not need to inform you of their manoeuvres for obvious fucking reasons, but also subpoena'ing witnesses is standard practice, which I would assume an accomplished paralegal would know.

When all else fails, just pull on the apron strings of the 10th circuit while you bemoan an unjustifiably lenient sanction and undermine the authority of the person you're complaining to.

Your hesitancy to reveal information is not the issue. It is your recalcitrance to engage with your legal process. We've been over this, buddy boy.

Does he actually believe nothing can ever get done without oversight from Mommy 10th circuit?

On what basis is you fucking with discovery worth $500 or less? What expertise do you have to come to that determination?

No, impoverished stalker child. You will not reduce the sanction to $74.75. Enjoy Mr Hardin reminding you that IFP status (which you no longer have) should not be a factor when considering sanction amounts. Enjoy debt.