💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.5%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 168 24.2%

  • Total voters
    693
What do you guys think? would Aaron go on? or would they even reach out to him?
Who the fuck cares?

If he goes on with them, he's a dumbass.

These bitches are bad faith. I already mentioned that the redheaded one acted all pissy about how the CPS report partially leaked, and then paid absolutely no attention whatsoever to what was in it. Let's hear about how the nanny allegedly gave Nick's kids alcohol, but not how Nick's youngest daughter tested positive for cocaine.

Gag a maggot.

They're gonna protect Nick's ass as long as they can make Aaron look like the ultimate bad guy. These "mothers" do not care about children. If I were Aaron that wouldn't be the type of show I'd want to go on.

Shit like this makes me think you should have to apply for a license to have children. To determine if you are morally and psychologically fit.
 
Who the fuck cares?

If he goes on with them, he's a dumbass.

These bitches are bad faith. I already mentioned that the redheaded one acted all pissy about how the CPS report partially leaked, and then paid absolutely no attention whatsoever to what was in it. Let's hear about how the nanny allegedly gave Nick's kids alcohol, but not how Nick's youngest daughter tested positive for cocaine.

Gag a maggot.

They're gonna protect Nick's ass as long as they can make Aaron look like the ultimate bad guy. These "mothers" do not care about children. If I were Aaron that wouldn't be the type of show I'd want to go on.

Shit like this makes me think you should have to apply for a license to have children. To determine if you are morally and psychologically fit.
This reads like they’re female Meltons with a smidgen of Juju
 
He's not gonna fuck them. They are not his type. Unless he gets really desperate.
If the fat one were to ride Nick cowgirl in his emaciated state, it'd probably shatter his pelvis.
(Assuming Nick could even get it up, that is).
Bitch boy's ass better be down at the police station making a report.
Because I'm a law-abiding NERD I've never given a statement to police, so I have a question. What do the police do if they suspect that somebody trying to make a report is intoxicated?
Is Nick aware that children lie as part of their normal development and also lie even more when their parents neglect them?

There’s no fucking way the nanny did this.
It's more plausible that one of the kids (probably the eldest) was pinching booze and partying with friends...and then lying to cover their own ass.
I love this new metric. Tweets per stream. It just shows us what gainful employment looks like.
Yes, but do keep in mind that all TPS reports must have the correct cover sheet on them.
 
He cares so little about views that he repeatedly brings them up when he can make other people look bad.
The second the metrics make him look like the absolute retard he is, they don't matter anymore.

Remember when Rekieta refused to take advice from Kiwifarms because HE was the social media expert. He knew what he was was doing. The proof was in his views and his subs.

Well, now that Kurt is beating him in views, he really needs to be taking advice on how to do social media from Kurt. He's not the LawPope anymore-- he's the Law Choirboy now.
 
I don't believe anything about the nanny at all. No whiteclaw, no monster drinks, no on-the-job drinking and (future) no cocaine. But I think he was clearly speaking about the 11 year old the whole time, only mentioning the 17 year old because the chat he was responding to asked why give it to the 11 year old and not the 17 year old:

"Why give to the 11 but not the 17...?
I have theories...
She either thought she could or it'd be better, her relationship with that child was particularly complicated."

says "long trial streams aren't my style"
Yo, this thing that I invented...this whole trial-stream genre that all these people would be nowhere without MY bestowing it upon them...not my style.

He said that he was wearing shorts and a tank top when he was arrested.
Lol, "a tank top." Nick, what was depicted on this tank-top?
tank.webp
 
This reads like they’re female Meltons with a smidgen of Juju
That would be one way of putting it. They are apparently fans of Melton.

Look, I don't really care if they hate Aaron, but they completely torpedo their credibility, in my view, when they talk about what an awful parent Aaron is, and then invite Nick fucking Rekieta on and softball him so they can get more tea on Aaron. I mean, come on. Have some fucking standards in your alogging, for fuck's sake.

If the fat one were to ride Nick cowgirl in his emaciated state
"Fat one."

I'm sorry, you're gonna have to be more specific.
 
I don't believe anything about the nanny at all. No whiteclaw, no monster drinks, no on-the-job drinking and (future) no cocaine.
If there were even a single iota of truth to it, we'd have heard about it well before the Cokestream last year. His narc brain would never have let it go unknown.
 
What do the police do if they suspect that somebody trying to make a report is intoxicated?

As far as I know they record everything as best they can and depending on the situation they act accordingly.

If it’s reporting a crime in progress, they will attend and check the situation themselves.
If it’s someone who has stumbled in off the street they will record what they say to keep them under control and decide how drunk and what the next course of action, e.g. sending them home in a police car or taxi, putting them in the drunk tank to sleep it off, but they will probably review the burblings to see if there was anything of importance.
 
Why would you have to pay kids to drink any energy drink in the first place? Kids love that shit and guzzle caffeine every chance they get out of the supervision of their parents.
 
When he discussed the "particularly complicated" relationship that Chaney had with one of his kids, I took that to mean the DAUGHTER who is supposedly narcing on the nanny. I am also assuming that this is the ADHD daughter who tested positive. That's speculation, but it makes sense.

This kid is difficult. Nick wants to throw the nanny under the bus, and it's the same kid who got coked-up (somehow).
It is not very difficult for a parent to manipulate their child, particularly one taking prescription drugs for behavioral problems, into making false accusations.

And speaking of booze, do you ever think Nick wet the bed?
Surely someone in that house did. Long term ketamine use leads to urinary incontinence. I’ll leave it at that.
 
“This nanny was a piece of shit and terrible person. Here’s her name. Please don’t harass her”
How many lawsuits is it going to take before Bob and Celeste say "What the FUCK are you doing, Nick?"
This nigger is trying to collect lawsuits like they’re gym badges or something. Why the fuck would you even bring the nanny up in a time like this?
Because Pedomania didn't have the impact he thought it would. People are sick of hearing about his former gay lover, so now he needs a new target for his histrionics.
 
Lol, "a tank top." Nick, what was depicted on this tank-top?
I'm not a lawyer, but I feel like it should be illegal to wear a tank top and shorts when you have no fucking shoulders or legs.
Why would you have to pay kids to drink any energy drink in the first place?
I mean, the simplest reason is, "He made it the fuck up, because his mouth is open and cocks are not inside."

Additionally, I find it incredibly offensive to use figures like "$75" for a retard (me), when I can only understand financial figures in terms of KNUs.
 
Meanwhile he has committed per se defamation against the real nanny:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=_yoil3j3dqoHe thought it was someone else stealing his booze? Like who? Lying faggot. Hopefully the nanny takes him to court. He's also just admitted to further child neglect either way.

And he supposedly bitched out at SOMEONE ELSE! I would not lay 50:1 odds that the INNOCENT party got an apology.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=OkZ8nX2oUEI
Am I mishearing, or is he quite literally suggesting that this was all part of a grand conspiracy to place his children in foster care?

He is referring to Dan Sletta's supposed statement that he wanted to get the children out of the house where the 'inappropriate relationship' was happening between the Rekietas and Imholtes. He is playing this up in a paltering attempt to make people believe that there was more malice and premeditation in it than actually occurred.

Here's the superchat which prompted the nanny information

and video.

View attachment 7387904

Superchat_The nanny - Copy.mp4
"We also had a 17 year old"... Didn't the Nanny quit before he turned 17?
Nick: how could we know when it happened when we weren’t there?
Also Nick: She called us drunk while we were at a convention. But it is okay b/c my oldest son can hold down the fort.

What dumb ass wants a drunk woman around their 17 year old son when another responsible adult isn’t around? Anything could have happened. I don’t know anyone who would have not fired her ass right then and there. Called the grandparents and been like we need you to go over to the house and tell the nanny you are taking over. She has been drinking on the job. We are on our way home. Be there as soon as we can.
I wonder if that was the same convention that he did molly at and let the anime cosplay mommies step on him?

And speaking of booze, do you ever think Nick wet the bed? I know whisky doesn't make you piss like beer does but when you that deep in a bender accidents do happen. Or do you think he passed out on the floor of his streaming room, and the kids were all walking by his open door and they're like "Why is daddy sleeping on the floor" and Kayla has to like and say, "Well, daddy works so hard he just gets plum tuckered out and has to sleep on the floor, kids!"

Nanny left in February 2024, per Aaron. The oldest turned 17 in 2024. Nick is lying. Not because the dates do not match up, but because of how ABSURD his stories are that he does not CARE to get the dates correct.

We always knew Nick had a different nanny, there was a thing from a while ago where he claimed he was giving her an obscene amount a week to buy the kids snacks (thousands I think). April was clearly just Nick's girlfriend that he lied and said was his nanny to his fans and the cops when they busted him with all that cocaine to explain why a married man had another woman sleeping over.
Pays "north of $50k"
"can't afford a $90k nanny anymore"

Fucking classic Nick lies: says 2 different things, fuzzes the spaces between for the weasel room either direction. Clearly he holds the "$30k" of "snacks" against her and sorta-but-not-sorta will blend that into what he actually paid whenever it suits.
A kid having a sip of beer is a big deal, harmless, not a big deal, OK if it happens in the 1980's and/or in Texas, the biggest deal in the universe, (most importantly) alright when Nick does it. Glad I learned new stuff today.
30k probably also includes other things than just food and snacks. Like clothes, school supplies and so on. Does Nick or Kayla look like parents that do that sort of shopping every single time? 5 growing children go through surprising amount of clothes. And then if you add up even more discretionary spending like toys... I can really see that total hits 30k knowing the spending habits of Nick at least...
Wait… I’m a little confused…

Did Nick seriously just claim that the Nanny’s “expenses” are groceries for… HIS kids?!

How is Nick feeding his kids (poorly) somehow “the nanny’s expenses”?

The only other alternative explanation is that Nick is seriously claiming that he spent FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS on fast food. For some of the kids. When they’re on the way back from an activity.

WTF?!? That’s like what… FOUR THOUSAND McD meals?!? Or EIGHT HUNDRED nude pics of Kayla?!

The gas really went to his noggin’ didn’t it?

(I suppose the only other possibility besides Nick lying his ass off as usual, is that he’s such a dumbass that the nanny scammed him out of tens of thousands of dollars by saying she needed to get a happy meal, so could he please reimburse her the 100$ she spent. In which case I can only say: You go girl! Get dat bag!)

The snack budget was allegedly 3k USD per month. That is MORE than 30k per annum by 20%. Nick's fake made-up numbers make no sense. This is 107 deg. F. fever all over.
 
Back
Top Bottom