💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
TrainWreckWatcher
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2023
Now that I think about it. The AI generated Thumbnail...
How does anyone listen to this guy? I can't believe how miserable he is to listen to. I struggled to get through this clip.
My theory is, its a fake dono like others have said.
That or remember Melton gets a cut of any donations that go through too. Not sure if its 10% 30% or what. But he's just giving himself money back either way.
The Hat Trick is upon us. After that I agree he should be ineligible and should just be an award himself.
No one can compete. If they admit that and just create a special Balldo Award I'm fine with that.
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2024
The term he used was "interested party" to be more precise, if that makes any difference:
Taking into account everything he's teased so far, the most likely scenario seems to be that April has expressed willingness to consent to the release or already has, for three main reasons. First off it best fits the need for someone to run to the Spicer/Willmar area in person for her to sign pertinent paperwork that might have been impractical to coordinate remotely in her case, in stark contrast to something like delivering a written request or fee payment to a county office, which Hardin should have been allowed to FedEx straight from his office. Secondly she better fits the term "interested party" in that she has pre-existing legal rights pertaining to the footage, unlike EWU who just happen to be interested in seeing it like any other member of the public. Perhaps EWU could add some financial contribution and some relative air of legitimacy to a joint request to the county and as a co-plaintiff in any subsequent declaratory action, but their impact would stop there.
Thirdly and most importantly, it's very telling where he emphasized how he now knows that even in the "worst-case situation" he's going to get at least some of what he wants and the "damage is already done" there no matter how hard Rekieta tries to stop it or undo it, and instead all that remains up in the air is whether he gets all of what he wants in the best-case scenario. This likely alludes to a downside that hasn't been discussed much here or at least hasn't been widely accepted by the most optimistic here: even if April gives her full consent and even if she can't or won't enforceably rescind that consent, the county would be likely to redact any portion of the footage in which she does not personally appear, if not also redact portions in which she personally appears but the privacy interests of non-consenting parties are implicated, such as anything depicting the interior of the home. This problem could be easily overcome by her simply forking over a flash drive of the complete unredacted footage that would have been sent to her attorney in discovery from her own criminal case where there is no publicly filed protective order prohibiting that disclosure, but an NDA and/or some legal advice about any tort liability pertaining to the Rekietas' privacy interest must have hindered that option or else you'd think Null would already have gotten the footage that way, so for the time being county redactions limited to the scope of her consent can be expected.
Even after those redactions there would still be what April said in police questioning outside the home, which was damaging enough that Nick's omnibus motion prematurely sought to have it excluded from trial evidence, so it's still "significant" as stated and would technically be enough to win the bet with Ralph as well, but it would still take the written demand to the county and any subsequent litigation to obtain the vast majority of the footage that April's consent arguably cannot control.
That said, it's still at least possible that all of the above could fit one or more of the sheriff's deputies consenting to release of whatever small portion of the footage their consent can control, which you'd think would go against department policy generally but might have warranted an exception here because of all the misconduct that Nick was dumb enough to allege or insinuate over the past year.
It's also at least possible that Aaron could have been considered (or could still become) an "interested party" capable of "significant" assistance but in a different way: although he's not on the list of people who can consent to even partial release, a request for the footage could benefit from an affidavit from him regarding the effect of Nick's repeated public insinuations that Aaron may have planted the drugs, dosed the daughter, etc., which the footage would be needed to dispel. Moreover if it is true that he is preparing for any kind of legal action in the near future, then his attorney could conceivably use a subpoena to obtain at least some relevant portions of the footage, such as footage of the confiscated weapons and loose cartridge to the extent relevant to showing whether there's an objectively reasonable enough concern for physical safety to justify an HRO, or even footage of the drug search to the extent relevant to the low likelihood of his access to the drugs' location for purposes of showing harassing intent in an HRO case or showing a false statement in a defamation case, or even a broader portion of the footage to the extent relevant to defending himself against any defamation counterclaim from Nick that in any way implicates Aaron's past statements about the state of the home, etc. This still seems to be the absolute least likely possibility, however, for all the reasons previously discussed ITT about why he has held off from taking any legal action at all.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
It may not seem like it, but this is a new low.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
Being a cucked loser that gets btfo'd every tweet is a job?
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
Rekieta Report / Weekly Roundup / Peak & Concurrent Views
On average, RekietaLaw lost approximately 257 concurrent live viewers per week over that 4-week period.
If trends continue, in about 6.2 weeks, RekietaLaw will be livestreaming to no viewers.
His channel subs are getting decimated, with 6k subs lost this year so far.
When do you think we'll get the Sub-400k gift?
Verdict:
The RekietaLaw channel direction still working its way through Dante Alighieri's Rings of Hell, with no foreseeable escape.
- Peak Concurrent Viewers -
| Week | Peak Viewers | % Change from Previous Week |
|---|---|---|
| 12/05 – 18/05 | 2,214 | −69.3% |
| 05/05 – 11/05 | 7,219 | +22.3% |
| 28/04 – 04/05 | 5,901 | +76.3% |
| 21/04 – 27/04 | 3,347 | – |
- Avg. Concurrent Viewers -
| Week | Avg. Viewers | % Change from Previous Week |
|---|---|---|
| 12/05 – 18/05 | 1,597 | −15.2% |
| 05/05 – 11/05 | 1,883 | −10.8% |
| 28/04 – 04/05 | 2,112 | −10.8% |
| 21/04 – 27/04 | 2,369 | – |
If trends continue, in about 6.2 weeks, RekietaLaw will be livestreaming to no viewers.
His channel subs are getting decimated, with 6k subs lost this year so far.
When do you think we'll get the Sub-400k gift?
Verdict:
The RekietaLaw channel direction still working its way through Dante Alighieri's Rings of Hell, with no foreseeable escape.
This would be unironic balldo-pocalypse, and I hope your on the money
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2024
Should have had a 10 for 10 years last year for the 10th anniversary like the nba had its 50 for 50 lists and 75 for 75 years lists.
1. Christian Weston Chandler
2. DSP
3. Ralph (Or maybe the sektur)
4. Nick (Or maybe the Baldoverse)
5. Sargon
6. Patrick Tomlinson
7. Daniel Larson
8. Cyrax (or maybe BMJ, he can be the Damien lillard)
9. Anisa Johma
10. Destiny/Hasan/Ethan/Keffels or whoever is determined the dumbest political streamer not named Carl Benjamin
I'm sure I'm missing some big ones off the top of my head, and the order is a forever debate, but Sargon is top 5 and ill die on that hill.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
My Fell For It Again badge is freshly polished and my clock is set to a countdown of exactly two more weeks. Let's go.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
This stopped being true a long time ago. He appears to have had to respond to complaints on at least 2 separate occasions including when he insulted Schneider on stream.
Aaron explained nearly a year ago what happened. Nick offered the opportunity to Aaron and April to buy the second home for $350,000, which he initially described as a great deal (he started calling it a rip-off even at that price after the listing photos got revealed, it subsequently sold for $380k). The plan was for Aaron to sell his house in St. Cloud (which was in his sole name) and purchase Nick's second Spicer home and put it in both Aaron and April's names.
April then ran out of Nick's house while Aaron and his kids were there and took all of her belongings out. Aaron said that April still wanted to buy the second house, but initially only they would only live together as "friends" and they would decide later if they would stay married or not (this may not be exact, but close enough to what he said). Nick has since specified that April moving out occurred on April 7 2024, meaning this text would be from the day after it happened.
It seems Nick wanted to double dip; after selling his home for $350k to Aaron and April, April would then be entitled to half of the house after they divorced, since it would be in both of their names. April did him a massive favor by leaving him before this happened.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
Evil Eddie rigged the vote
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I think the most likely officer would be Pomplun. Not only has Nick lied about and defamed him the most of any of the cops, he's also retired.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
His job is to seethe at people on Twitter all day?
He must work at the same place as Patrick Tomlinson.
Wonder if you get dental and a 401k with that.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2024
It was Jim Felt who retired, Quin Pomplun is still active.
Melty Butter
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
Right, this feels a lot like April. Aaron would be a stretch by my reading of the statute:
Link
Note the word "redacted". This means Nick, Kayla and the kids could be "redacted". (I can't find anywhere in the statutes that defines "redacted" for MN bodycam, but AI says it would simply be blurring of the faces. But that's AI.)
And, overall, this is what Harden and Josh are dealing with. It states that Nick would be given notice of any releases. Can he fight it with, say, an injunction? That's my question. Josh hinted at that issue today.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
His job is tweeting? How much does he get paid?
And yeah, sure, he's on social media and I'm sure he counts it as promo work. And I bet he also billed his 28 clients for
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
My mistake. He's talked some pretty mad shit about both of them, though. If I were any cop in this I would be positively eager to have my name cleared.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
Nick is actively keeping up with events to throw his spanner in the works.
The dream is some kind of Balldo-alog Avengers moment where April and all the cops submit approval of release at the same time.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- May 28, 2024
April helping release the bodycam footage would be incredible. The woman Nick likes more than his own wife betraying him. Imagine the spiraling.
- Joined
- May 31, 2024
This should have been made available to April, unredacted, as part of discovery. If she is indeed the one releasing it, I don't think she wouldn't need any of these permissions. These are restrictions on the state releasing it to others. April should just be able to dump everything they gave her.
Nick would also be able to dump his copy, unredacted and without any permission.