US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
babadook said:
Takes a winner to get mad over drive-by posting

Get raped
Click to expand...
I apologize for not previously knowing youre only capable of fatherlessness behavior and youre not worth responding to in general. Wont happen again.

You deserve to be replaced by the way, you make it easy for the elites who want to keep us working class people stupid and divided. Other than that I hope you have a great day. 😘
 
Hey Johnny Bravo said:
I actually love this guy's channel. All you need to know about him is he gets angry if you call vinyl records "vinyls." His technical knowledge is exquisite but he's a flaming autistic homo from the Midwest. It is what it is.

Probably the only openly homo YouTuber who doesn't delve into politics is Max Miller.
Click to expand...
mlanguishi said:
This nigger in his ultra autistic explanation of dehumidifiers just has to make some mini rant about 'due process' and that 'all Americans' deserve it. I know he's always a shitlib but holy crap, just ruins the vid implying that illegals are 'Americans'.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=j_QfX0SYCE8:1776
Click to expand...
All I remember about this guy is how he was sperging that Americans don't have strict turn signal laws that other countries do, so the obvious right break light blinking means turning right triggers his tism.
 
World Famous Quasi Payer said:
And right now, at this fucking moment, that token minority seems to be one of the only people who give a shit about enabling the world you want.

God I wish retards would learn realpolitik.
Click to expand...
I’m not disagreeing that Sarah seems like a great candidate for pope. I’m disagreeing that referring to him as a “token minority” and saying that we need a black pope to “enact racist policies” is fucking gay and stupid and deserves ridicule.

If you think Sarah is a good candidate for his perspectives and willingness to view truth as eternal and unchanging, then where’s the realpolitik? The optics of a nigger pope? I don’t love that idea but shit I ain’t even Catholic. I’m only interested in this outcome because I believe that the global representative of Christianity needs to be firm and masculine.

None of what you said addresses the issues I took with the retard I was originally replying to. So either you believe that, despite his based views, Sarah really is little more than a token minority, or you couldn’t understand what I was saying in the first place. That might be on me, but I thought I was pretty clear in what I took umbrage with.
 
Chop Top said:
You argue like a complete faggot.

The Pope is not beholden to anyone but God. He makes religious decrees you absolute retard. He does not “enact” policies or exercise executive power.

Saying that policies are “racist” in the first place, even if you don’t mean it that way, is passively validating shitlib worldviews because you’re using their lexicon. Idiots like you always fall for this and that’s why your battle cry of “Dems are the real racists!” has never swayed anyone ever and makes you look as gay and dumb as you are.

No, you do not need a token minority to have a good pope just because Western countries are populated with too many weak-willed suicidal progressive morons and predatory shitskins. Are you even familiar enough with the cardinals to make such a statement, or is your embarrassing lust for a le heckin based magical negro too strong for you to make any other considerations?

God I wish conservatives would be less embarrassing.
Click to expand...
You're naive if you dont think that Francis didnt play a massive role in priming Europe to get assraped by the hordes of muslim refugees. Obama and Susan Rice ran a soft coup on Benedict for a reason.

Youre a real sensitive fella arent ya, getting your feelings hurt about my glib use of racist. You sound like the faggy libtard worrying about gay shit like validating worldviews. You should know only God validates thru objective reality.

Yes you dont need a Black to be a good pope. I have observed that these sort of strong immigration stances are easier for the normies to embrace when it's lead by a minority that's all I meant. Not a hard concept to wrap one's heads around. But of course there always those special few to prove me wrong.

P.S. Im not conservative Im right wing. No point conserving a system that is inherently retarded and broken.
 
Last edited:
Chop Top said:
I’m not disagreeing that Sarah seems like a great candidate for pope. I’m disagreeing that referring to him as a “token minority” and saying that we need a black pope to “enact racist policies” is fucking gay and stupid and deserves ridicule.

If you think Sarah is a good candidate for his perspectives and willingness to view truth as eternal and unchanging, then where’s the realpolitik? The optics of a nigger pope? I don’t love that idea but shit I ain’t even Catholic. I’m only interested in this outcome because I believe that the global representative of Christianity needs to be firm and masculine.

None of what you said addresses the issues I took with the retard I was originally replying to. So either you believe that, despite his based views, Sarah really is little more than a token minority, or you couldn’t understand what I was saying in the first place. That might be on me, but I thought I was pretty clear in what I took umbrage with.
Click to expand...
Most people are liberals, most conservatives are yesterday's liberals. The majority of the population operates within that frame work. That's why things have gotten to be so bad. To me the realpolitik of the matter is how it is going to be sold to normies. Like Trump's deportations going after "criminals" when its perfectly justified to boot anyone who comes to the US illegally. I agree we shouldn't have to coach our actions like this. However, we don't have much of an option. After all the current sitting president, and vice president used to be democrats. Likewise, the last pope wasn't much of a Christian.
 
The "due process" narrative is the same thing as the "he crossed state lines with a gun" narrative for Kyle Rittenhouss. Something that (due to framing) appears at first glance to be true and allows fencesitters to take a """"moderate"""" position on a hot button issue while appearing informed. 'I agree he should be allowed to defend himself but he bought a gun across state lines to a protest' is 'I agree we should deport illegals but they should go through due process first'. Pure midwittery taken advantage of by the media.
 
likeacrackado said:
The "due process" narrative is the same thing as the "he crossed state lines with a gun" narrative for Kyle Rittenhouss. Something that (due to framing) appears at first glance to be true and allows fencesitters to take a """"moderate"""" position on a hot button issue while appearing informed. 'I agree he should be allowed to defend himself but he bought a gun across state lines to a protest' is 'I agree we should deport illegals but they should go through due process first'. Pure midwittery taken advantage of by the media.
Click to expand...
Especially since by law the only required due process is three questions.

Question 1: Are you a citizen or legal resident of the USA.


If yes, end interview. If No, ask question 2.

Question 2: Do you have a valid Visa issued to you at a port of entry by the US government?

If yes,end of interview. If no, ask question 3.

Question 3: what country are you a citizen of?

If X, send person to X. If Y, send person to Y.

Due process given.

Technically judges should not even be part of this. Which is why every illegal claims refugee status. This is a loophole since as a signatory to the refugee charter, the USA is required to grant asylum for legitimate cases.

Trump should close that loop hole by just withdrawing from that treaty.
 
mindlessobserver said:
ICE has started deporting Illegals, along with their US citizen anchor babies. Media losing its mind. Zomg, US citizens getting sent to Honduras! Said US citizen is of course 2 years old and is sent in the custody of their parents, but details details.

Click to expand...
The great thing about this is she wouldn't give custody to the father (an american citizen), which would have let the kid stay in the US. Women being women.
 
Fuck Bankers said:
China Takes Vietnamese Island?
Click to expand...
Having recently been to Vietnam, I can say with confidence that they fucking hate the chinks more than they hate anyone else and all this does is push them into the arm's of The West. It's going to be remarkable, and totally unheard of 30 years ago, when Vietnam, the US, and much of SE Asia start co-operating more, militarily.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom