Are modern childrens clothing inappropriate?

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Brenda Holiday

Brenda Holiday

World renowned failure at both death and life
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 12, 2022
I'm really fucking sick of not being able to have this discussion without someone coming in with "uhm ackually you even thinking this makes you a pedophile..."
One thing I have a major issue with is the concept of a bikini for children, children as young as toddlers. It makes absolutely no sense. It exposes their skin to the sun, and is insanely inappropriate, and I'm tired of pretending its not. I have seen some people complain about little girl clothes having random holes in them, mostly around the hip/waist area. Again, why? Also short shorts and super tight leggings. Why?
A popular cope is "pedophiles will look at kids no matter what", fair, I agree actually. So why make it worse? Why make it easier? I'm not blaming the child. In a perfect world it wouldn't matter, but we don't live in a perfect world. Why the fuck are parents defending a BIKINI for TODDLERS and I'm the pedophile for calling it out? Am I overreacting? Has it always been like this, but now we're just hyper aware of pedophiles?
 
I had a turbo-normie, club-going latina coworker at my last job get visibly angry at some woman who had her kid wearing a miniskirt and thigh highs, so it's not just us online being hyper aware or "ermm actually you're the real pedo!" argument holding any ground.
 
It's difficult for parents to even find appropriate clothing, but not that difficult. When they're little you can put boy pants and shorts on them. It's pretty unisex at that age.
When they're older they'll think you're an asshole for not letting them dress like their little tart friends but parents need to grow the fuck up and not be afraid to tell their children that they look like hoes and their friends and trends are stupid and only stupid people are followers.
 
If I see a baby's butt with 'Juicy' written across it, that's a person who shouldn't be a parent.
Normies agree on this. It's disgusting and bizarre.
 
Around the scamdemic (I think, maybe before that), kids started dressing like adults. Kids are starting to dress like kids again, yet it seems some parents are clinging to the past in some of the worst ways possible. I think, other than parents refusing to parent, part of it is the oversexualization of society (bottom text) and social media fucking with people's priorities.
 
The bank I work at is close to the grade school, and the clothes the kids wear is genuinely gross.
I should not be seeing a kid's ass ANYWHERE. Why the fuck are the shorts so skimpy?
"DON'T JUDGE THEM!" Bro these clothes are like candy to pedos, and parents don't give a shit enough to think, "wait will this make my kid a target?"
And I notice this because sometimes the richer families come in with their kids and they're wearing those things.
There's a difference between being a prude vs not giving pedos a good time. Have some fucking common sense.
 
Its not even just recently. I remember in the early 2000s at a gas station seeing some family whose little girl was wearing shorts that had something written on the butt area. Which meant it was specifically designed to draw attention to her rear.

Even back then, me and my friend were like "why would anyone allow their little girl to wear that?"
 
There is something deeply disturbing with most kid cloths in shops being mostly branded clothes, an early indoctrination to be sucked into the Marvel/Star Wars shit. There is also something sinister with a bikini made for a 10 year old, Weimar shit right there. Using kids to be a walking billboard for kike shit and then on top of that, sexualising them should be a indicator that most parents are so ingrained in the goyslop.

Brenda Holiday said:
I'm really fucking sick of not being able to have this discussion without someone coming in with "uhm ackually you even thinking this makes you a pedophile..."
Click to expand...
You see, you have to dig a little deeper to understand this. Most normies are using this cope because they themselves grow up being degenerates and can't understand that clothes is being part of sexual appeal. It's the "not asking for it" rape meme that feminists pushed, causing this mentality to be the norm. Normies are programmed to defend what they see on the TV so it's an uphill battle here.

Prepubescent females don't have tits, hence why it makes zero sense trying to "focus" that area if the body. Unless you are trying to incite the idea that they are "sexually available". It's a deliberate design, it's litrally a bra. Women with no tits, will still wear a bra to hint that "I got some tits, I'm sexually available", that's the point of a bikini! Dumb hoes won't admit this and if you call this out they will call you an incel/chud or what ever. But that's the logic behind this and the same thing can be applied to skimpy shorts. If you really want to go further, look into the discussion of shapewear and gyms. So to pick these clothes for kids, is a bad idea.

Since you want to teach girls to still cover up (since they will grow up), the best option is simply a swimming suite. If you look at athletes, they use swimming suites since they have lower risk of wardrobe malfunction. When kids play around, why would you use a bikini that has a hight risk of falling off? It's again, a bad idea.

So, when they use that reddit phrase, it's an NPC response. The moment they admit it's wrong, they will have to admit that they are lazy (looks over functionality) and their whole logic surrounding feminism will fall apart too.
 
I'm very convinced that pedophiles are secretly working to produce and design children's clothing. Wouldn't be fucking shocked if someone from some company is ousted for being a pedo that designs children's clothing.
 
I hate when girls' clothes are cut intentionally so much smaller than boys' because girls' clothes are "cute" and boys' clothes are "functional."
1745690418192.webp 1745690443698.webp
Even entire outfits become an issue. There was this tiktok trend (might still be going around idk) where moms would compare their outfits for their kid vs grandma's outfit for the kid, and 9 times out of 10 the "better" outfit the mom picked is just something sexually charged. Like, this was the first one I found on Google:
1745690804760.webp

Skin-tight clothes for a toddler that drag on the ground already aren't great, but in motion it's worse. Her entire belly hanged out when she moved because the pants were so tight they rolled down. That is NOT appropriate for a little girl trying to celebrate the 4th! But you can't say that shit because just like you (op) said, when you call it out everyone acts like YOU'RE the pervert for noticing. Then actual perverts flood the tiktok comments and save these videos to big playlists full of little girls in suggestive situations/outfits, and it's just disturbing.
 

Attachments

  • 1745690443698.webp
    1745690443698.webp
    82 KB · Views: 14
skykiii said:
Its not even just recently. I remember in the early 2000s
Click to expand...
Pretty sure parents noticed inappropriate children's clothing in the '80s.

I've noticed pre-teens wearing crop tops and short-shorts/miniskirts and the boys with sagging pants for years, and it's really disturbing. Their parents not being there means they're not paying attention to how their children are presenting themselves out in public, and we're supposed to not care? As adults, how are we not supposed to tell these irresponsible parents to their faces or ask these unattended (don't care if they're in groups, pre-teens should not be left alone) children "Who let you out of the house looking like that?"

We shouldn't be left gossiping or whispering to whoever's with us "Holy shit what is wrong with these parents?", it just feels like we're literally ignoring a problem and contributing to statistics by passively letting it happen.
 
Sangue e terra said:
clothes is being part of sexual appeal.
Click to expand...
"Clothes aren't sexual" was something I saw people say on this topic often and its such bullshit. There was a time maybe two years ago where these leggings got really popular on tiktok, and of course that trickles down and then kids started wanting them. I know people irl that bought these because their 13 year old asked for them. Fucking insane.
71Z9UxTv67L._AC_UY1000_.webp
I remember being 13 and wanting regular leggings when those became popular, my mom got them for me but made me wear long shirts or dresses over them. Thank you mom.
pyrinyx said:
I'm very convinced that pedophiles are secretly working to produce and design children's clothing. Wouldn't be fucking shocked if someone from some company is ousted for being a pedo that designs children's clothing.
Click to expand...
I didn't want to sound schizo but yeah, I mean there was the Balenciaga thing and the LOL dolls which had genitals, and some that if you dipped in water would reveal lingerie and fishnet leggings... also Bratz babys were creepy as fuck looking back. Whoever designed that shit needs to be looked into.
I saw some retard say "well barbie is naked under her clothes" in response to the LOL dolls with lingerie and just... how can you be so stupid?
Chromeo said:
There was this tiktok trend (might still be going around idk) where moms would compare their outfits for their kid vs grandma's outfit for the kid, and 9 times out of 10 the "better" outfit the mom picked is just something sexually charged. Like, this was the first one I found on Google:
Click to expand...
Can't stand this trend. I can't tell if they actually dress their kid like that on the regular or if they do it knowing it gets them negative attention which = money. Either way they're exploiting their kid. And the fact that those clothes even exist to be bought in the first place...
 
Brenda Holiday said:
"Clothes aren't sexual" was something I saw people say on this topic often and its such bullshit.
Click to expand...
People who say this are bad actors. They KNOW what they're doing. Clothes aren't sexual...folded up in a dresser drawer. Clothes ARE sexual when they're revealing, when they're associated with sexuality, when their primary focus is to emphasize the sex organs (or intentionally obfuscate them, in the case of habit/burka fetishists.) I think part of solving the problem means ignoring the retards out here trying to pretend there isn't one. You can spend hours debating a retard who says shit like that, and all that happens is you get distracted from the point. It's like those disruptors the CIA sent to infiltrate groups and get them so caught up arguing minutae and definitions that they never got anything done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom