US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First of all, Third Row seating is quite a bit of honor since, 1. Trump is not Catholic, he is Presbyterian. Second of all he is a Divorcee, and Thirdly he is Head of State for a country that is explicitly not Catholic but rather Liberal. So actually third row seating makes perfect sense and is actually better then what could have been offered which is no seat at all.
I just think its weird the president is going to the pope's funeral
 
I'm glad Trump is arresting judges.

They're so used to being invincible as they sit on their perch above others, playing dress up in their silly robes, feeling omnipotent as they swing the novelty toy hammer that gives them power over murderers and rapists they know they could never take in a fight, but must stand and sit when told like dogs and say "Yes, your honor" as they're sentenced. This goes to some judges' heads, until they think they outrank the President.

Now, they can be lead into the courtroom in an orange jumpsuit and chains, and rise and sit and say "Yes, your honor" as they're verbally berated and sentenced!
It's about 250 years too late to be giving these pinko commies a taste of the fascism they crave. Der prozess is der punizhment, and the only way these lawyer DOGS will learn who is their sovereign is with a healthy dose of PAIN. As far as I can tell, a law degree is proof positive of conspiring to aid and abet rapists and other black people.

Now where's the grave of John Adams so I can dig him up and bury him again upside down?
 
I'm hearing that the biggest impediment for becoming a doctor these days is all the insurance and paperwork fuckery. Major hospital groups buy out a doctor's office and then dump patients onto doctors, trying to get as many patients seen as possible within a day so they can maximize profit. That's more paperwork on all the staff and leads to many doctors straight up leaving the profession, or they try opening their own private practice that does not take insurance. It also leads to medical mistakes and, obviously, burnout.

The AMA does advocate for policies to keep the number of doctors lower, but they cannot stop people from entering medical school or getting a job. Medical schools want students and hospitals want doctors. You're not wrong, but it's more complicated than "AMA says so and gets what it wants."
I dont know why you are lying or being a boomer about this. Medical school slots are tightly constrained via a refusal to accredit more slots/schools. Those slots are tightly DEI pozzed to hate on white men.

Once you pass that hurdle. There are people who graduate medical school but cant find a residency. I have met them. Residency slots also have DEI standards.

Then we have residency itself. Which if you asked me a worse way to actually train or teach someone something I would struggle to think of it. Its a giant hazing ritual. DEI once again, you can haze the white man you cant haze Shaniqua.

Meanwhile Doctor Jeet or Doctor Chong dont deal with any of that and get on a visa because we have a "shortage of doctors".
 
I just think its weird the president is going to the pope's funeral
Its indicative of the shift represented by Trump's election. I hate throwing the term reactionary around, because leftists love to use the term and apply it to anyone who tries to undo their "progress". But it really does apply to Trump. He's a "Reactionary".

It should also be noted Trump is the first US President to attend a Papal funeral. Not even JFK, who was a Catholic had done so.

It also speaks more broadly to the decline of Protestantism more generally in the USA. We still hear alot about the "Evangelical Right", but Evangelicals are not really that large a voting block anymore, while the mainline protestant denominations like Trumps own Presbyterians, and others like the Lutherans, Episcopalians, Methodists and Baptists are in decline. Largely due to internal Schisms (Baptists, Methodists and Episcopalians) and just general spiritual malaise.

The Roman Catholic Church in the USA however is growing. Reporting 2 million new members in the last 10 years alone. Which would have been unthinkable back in JFK's time. There really is no getting around the fact that the center of gravity for Christianity is shifting back towards Rome. As an Episcopalian myself, I can confirm I am at looking at ground zero of the Apostasy crisis in American Protestantism. After the Liberals took over, half the church started anointing Lesbian priestesses and keeping all the property and money, while the other half were left bereft and ultimately split in two. 25% going to hold services in American Legion halls until the old boomers on the vestry died and the congregation disintegrated. The final 25% became Roman Catholics. Starting to think I might end up in that camp sooner rather then later.

Trump is nothing if not aware of the shifting political headwinds. So him attending a papal funeral speaks to that mindset of trying to stay ahead of social trends. Something that has served him well over his career.
 
Masters programs are unfunded in the social sciences
basing your education and career on a discipline that people with normal jobs could learn on the weekends with wikipedia and will never earn money except from the government or tranny loving academics is certainly a bold choice
 
I spent a lot of time in the Mormon church when I was a kid. Mormons didn't care about going to other denominations funerals, I don't see why Presbyterians would.
 
The Presbyterian church has gone down the road of Apostasy like most mainline American Protestant churches.

This is a bit of derail but I just read/listened to a dude talk about the "long house" and women subverted church leadership starting with having women speak to women.

Do you think thats a factor or is the decline something else?

I grew up with a fucking cult.
 
Hot damn. I fuck off for a couple of days and hear about groveling chinks and judges getting arrested. Maybe if I leave for a month I can come back to TOTAL COMMIE NIGGER DEATH.
 
The main reason I'm looking into PhDs is to get funding, since most Masters programs are unfunded in the social sciences (cue posters saying I should've just done mech e like everyone else)
Again it's not that I'm opposed to working in the private sector or getting a fellowship etc., it's that it's so hard and rare it might as well not be an option. I'll still try but I'm not optimistic
I thought you were british.
I've got Trump converting to Catholicism on my Bingo card.
Britannia Crusade when?
 
Poll: A sizeable chunk of Americans think neither party 'fights for people like you'
NBC News (archive.ph)
By Bridget Bowman and Ben Kamisar
2025-04-25 16:00:40GMT
Both political parties have significant work to do to convince Americans that they are fighting for them, according to the new NBC News Stay Tuned Poll powered by SurveyMonkey, with Democrats struggling to rally their own base of supporters.

The poll finds a plurality of adults (38%) say neither political party fights for people like them, while 24% say the Republican Party fights for them, 23% say the same of the Democratic Party, and 15% say both parties. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points.

The pessimism about the major parties comes after a 2024 election that saw a third-party hopeful, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., hit double-digits in some national polling before fading and eventually endorsing Donald Trump. And some big upcoming elections are set to have notable independent contenders, including the governor's race in Michigan, where Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan is running as an independent.

The survey also finds some angst among the Democratic Party’s more liberal supporters. Among those who say they consider themselves progressives first (as opposed to considering themselves Democrats first), 38% agree that neither party fights for them, while just half say they think their party fights for people like them.

By contrast, among the adults who say they align more with the Make America Great Again movement than the Republican Party itself, only 23% say neither party fights for them, compared to 67% who say the Republican Party fights for them.

Negative feelings about the Democratic Party and the GOP are driven largely by younger Americans, with 45% of adults ages 30-44 and 41% of adults ages 18-29 saying neither party fights for them — slightly higher shares than the older adults surveyed.

A sizable majority of those who voted for a third-party candidate in 2024 (69%) and a large plurality of those who did not vote (47%) also picked neither party when asked which one fights for people like them.

Months after a presidential election that was supposed to feature the two oldest nominees in American history (before then-President Joe Biden ended his bid), an overwhelming majority of adults (77%) also agree with the statement that “nothing will change in this country until we elect a new generation of leaders in Washington.”

The desire for a new generation of leaders is consistent across age groups, with more than 75% of adults in each generation agreeing with the statement.

That view is most prevalent among Democrats, with 89% agreeing with that statement, compared to 65% of Republicans. Both factions of the Democratic Party are also in agreement, with 90% of progressives saying Washington needs a new generation of leaders, and 89% of those who align more with the Democratic Party staying the same.

The push among these progressive Democrats is fueling some new primary challenges against longtime Democratic incumbents.

Down on both parties
It all colors the dim view that Americans have of their nation’s two political parties. But while majorities hold unfavorable views of both parties, Democrats are in worse shape with their own base.

Overall, both parties are viewed similarly among American adults: 40% view the Democratic Party favorably while 60% view it unfavorably, while the Republican Party is viewed favorably by 44% and unfavorably by 55%.

While the GOP has slightly better ratings overall, the bad news for Republicans is that political independents are actually lower on the party than they are the Democrats. (30% of independents view the GOP favorably, and 36% view the Democratic Party favorably.)

But for Democrats, their woes come in part from issues within their coalition, as 22% of Democrats view their party unfavorably, compared to just 13% of Republicans who feel that way about the GOP.

Those who identify with the progressive movement are far more likely to view their party unfavorably — as 30% of those progressives share that negative view of the Democratic Party. By comparison, just 10% of supporters of the MAGA movement view the GOP unfavorably.

The poll continues to underscore the gender gap that shapes this moment in American politics: 45% of women view the Democratic Party favorably, compared to 35% of men, while 49% of men view the Republican Party favorably, compared to 40% of women.

And that gap is more pronounced among younger voters between the ages of 18 and 29. Just 27% of these women view the Republican Party favorably, but 44% of these men do. On the flip side, 38% of young men view the Democratic Party favorably, compared to 54% of young women.

Party loyalty in flux
The survey also sheds new light on the composition of both parties and the degree of loyalty members feel (or don't feel) toward them as institutions.

Of the Republicans surveyed, a majority (56%) say they consider themselves to be more a supporter of the MAGA movement, while 44% say they are more a supporter of the Republican Party.

Those self-described MAGA Republicans are more likely to be white, male, and those without college degrees.

But even as President Donald Trump made gains among young men in November, a higher share of men ages 18-29 align more with the GOP than the MAGA movement. The same is true for all Republicans under 30.

An identical majority of Democrats (56%) say they align more with progressive causes and the progressive movement, while 44% say they align more with the Democratic Party.

Younger women and women with college educations are more likely to say they support the progressive movement, as are white Democrats. Among Black Democrats, about twice as many identify themselves as supporters of the Democratic Party first, as opposed to supporters of the progressive movement first.

This NBC News Stay Tuned poll was powered by SurveyMonkey, the fast, intuitive feedback management platform where 20 million questions are answered daily. It was conducted online April 11-20 among a national sample of 19,682 adults aged 18 and over, including 2,230 adults ages 18-29. Reported percentages exclude item nonresponse and round to the nearest percentage point. The estimated margin of error for this survey among all adults is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points. The estimated margin of error for this survey among 18-29-year-olds, or Gen Z, is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points.
 
That’s not because of theological disagreements but rather because of immigration from Catholic (Hispanic) countries.
Oh, theological disagreements definitely are involved I assure you. This isn't really an issue for evangelicals and southern Baptists. But its big time for the Methodists, Lutherans and Episcopalians.
 
Back
Top Bottom