- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
I always find it amusing when Emily says something briefly in passing to try to make a point, but ends up completely undermining everything else she says.Edit: And yes you could work. You say your symptoms are controlled on medications. So therefore your hallucinations are controlled. Once again you contradict yourself.
If she can't work because "she could have a hallucination", then:
- If there is a danger of Emily hallucinating, then either she is not on a correct dosage of medications to handle this particular symptom and not disclosing so to her doctor to adjust the dosages or she is again self-medicating and not taking the perscribed dosages. There is no situation in which both of these statements are false.
- Ignoring Rule #1 - Emily lies for a moment, Emily stating that there is a possibility of her hallucinating absolutely calls into question every other claim she has made, is making and will make because Emily cannot judge whether or not what she experiences is real or a hallucination. Therefore everything Emily says cannot be taken on its own, again ignoring Rule #1.
- But if Emily claims there is no danger of her hallucinating, then she was lying; the claim was a red herring and she's lying about her inability to work and it's more a matter of unwillingness to contribute to society and preferring to keep leeching off of the taxpayers.