US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the fact spic faggot was never given his right to due process?
HE
WAS
IN
THE
STATES
ILLEGALLY

He is not an American Citizen being imprisoned in El Salvador. He is a citizen of El Salvador, who was deported and imprisoned in a collaborative effort between the two countries, because guess what, Bukele also has it on good authority this fag is a gang member. Go complain to Bukele.

Also "due process" means "process that is due". The process that was due was considering his aslyum request and handing him his deportation order. It's done, he had his due process.

Low-Info Leftists make me fucking seethe. They always think they are so clever by repeating shit they heard on one of their faggy shows. Makes me want to fed post. The corrupt politicians wouldn't be able to get away with all the shit they are pulling if the citizenry wasn't this fucking retarded.
 
Nah, Trump was just straight up lying. He added those Letters and Numbers in Photoshop. He doesn't have terrorist experts working for him and advising him that know about the updated symbolism, especially now that these gangs are moving away from overtly identifying tattoos like they had in the past.

People who have never thought about gang tattoos since yesterday are obviously correct on this. He does not have "Property of MS-13" stamped on his ass and he keeps saying "I'm totally not Ms-13" so it's probably true.


This entire discussion is so fucking gay.
It's also a moot point. Ignoring the fact that MULTIPLE courts found this guy to be MS13. Ignoring the fact that El Salvador said "yes, we know this guy, he's MS13." He's an illegal. He's a citizen of El Salvador. The fact he was allowed to stay in the first place was the reversable error.

Trump has reversed the error.
 
Shouldn't be surprising no one is talking about this. Literally says doctors are sitting on their asses while women die. That isn't a win. for pro-aborts, or democrats in general. Everyone understand abortion bans are about preventing unnecessary abortions. Not necessary ones.

it's not surprising to you that the democrats aren't screeching about actual dead women to tell people why they better get out and vote against republican candidates and why orange hitler is doubleplusungood?

I think there were some fucking wires crossed here, the original question was what issues do the democrats have, and I listed them. this is a huge one and again I expect it will be a big thing during the midterms.
 
no, China does not do Cold War style puppet government installation nor massive ideological campaigns

China buys and sells shit like all your cadmium or all your coastal real estate or something
Then what are they doing in Africa? Then what did China do in Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, and Laos? It's okay to shill for China, but lying like this is silly.
 
"MUH DUE PROCESS FOR ILLEGALS" is now the new democrat talking point.

Holy shit.

Illegals who have never been caught don't have any right to a long due process. The concept is that they have no right to even receive due process as they failed to even enter legally.

The hordes that have been caught follow the usual Obama pathway. They get a court date year(s) in the future and are released. They fail to show up at the court date. That was the due process. They received it. They just deserve an extra special 3rd chance or something?
 
it's not surprising to you that the democrats aren't screeching about actual dead women to tell people why they better get out and vote against republican candidates and why orange hitler is doubleplusungood?

I think there were some fucking wires crossed here, the original question was what issues do the democrats have, and I listed them. this is a huge one and again I expect it will be a big thing during the midterms.
The problem is its a losing issue. It does nothing for them right now. Oh they'll scream about it during the midterms, absolutely. However they were going to do so anyway. Regardless of the actual effects of the bans. They were screaming about abortion prior to the election, and it didn't win them the election. In two years-ish during the midterms, dragging abortion back onto the national stage will be even less popular than it was before the election.

If anything, screaming about it now allows republicans to fix it. Where the "vague" law isn't vague anymore. Can't run on dead women if those women stop dying. As disgusting as that is. That's realpolitik for you.
 
none of that is happening in the 21st my fren

China is not the same kind of enemy as the USSR, that doesn't make them our buddies. this is not hard.
And neither is the Cold War, you stupid bint! And neither is the USSR in the 21st century
Both of which you mentioned. Holy shit you're dumb.
 
Shouldn't this be a huge deal? I know the U.S. has been tacitly supporting Ukraine against Russia
Not really. This publicity stunt does nothing to change reality on the battlefield.
>tacitly
No, America has been very OPENLY and DIRECTLY supporting Ukraine. The only thing that made waves is when Rubio flat-out said the conflict is a proxy war between US and Russia back in March:
“It’s been very clear from the beginning that President Trump views this as a protracted, stalemated conflict,” Rubio said. “And frankly, it’s a proxy war between nuclear powers, the United States helping Ukraine, and Russia.”

by his own words, killing members of the Russian military a huge act of aggression?
In fairness nothing that the other user posted shows the Congressman pulling the trigger or otherwise engaging enemy forces. He just signed a mortar bomb and got a tour of some safe frontlines or possibly a completely fake frontline. I say this because there's no way they'd be walking around like that during the day when Russian drones could easily take them out.
I would imagine that in older times, there'd be immediate demands to hand the Congressman over to Russia, or else they're declaring war.
Nope. This is exactly the kind of chimp-out from Russia that NATO/Ukraine expects and tries to provoke. So far Putler is not giving them the spergout that they want.
 
Back
Top Bottom