I have a few friends who work in IT fields; they've told me before that 90% of their coworkers are Indians. I'll have to ask them in a few months if that changes at all.
I still keep in touch with one of my former IT coworkers. From what was implied in conversation, I suspect they ultimately left the field because of the Jeets and the people hiring them wanting project managers to accommodate the Jeet fuckery. Plus, so many ads I see for open IT positions expect candidates to travel anywhere in the US on a moment's notice - something easier done by foreign imports with no ties to the US.
It will be curious to see how much changes, if anything.
I still don't understand why this guy in particular is the person the entire left has decided to rally around.
He's fat
He's not good looking
He's covered in gang tattoos
He is not a very sympathetic person.
I was discussing this with someone recently. We recalled someone whom we knew that was deported shortly after 9/11 when - to everyone's surprise - it was learned they and their kid had entered the US illegally. Nobody ever suspected because they worked, stayed out of trouble, and largely kept to themselves.
Someone like that is much easier to have sympathy for and rally behind than someone with ties to a brutal gang and was on the receiving end of a restraining order after committing domestic violence on his gf/wife/whomever and has an outstanding order of deportation when the situation changed/changes in their country of origin.
As someone else posted, the Dems seem to believe that selecting the worst of the worst to champion and using the message, "If you don't support this person, you're a horrible racist xenophobe," is going to get them what they want. It might work with their seal clapping supporters or those who feel compelled to buy any sob story, but this is the kind of rhetoric enough people got fed up with to vote for the other choice in Trump and his campaign promises. The average person will be more sympathetic to someone contributing to society and not taking from it.
The fact the headlines and opening paragraphs emphasize the guy is a union member seems to be more of a propaganda thing than a reason to let him stay.
The tattoos angle is just a really shit misdirection that tries to insinuate people are being scooped up off the streets if they have a bit of ink, rather than these people already being on law enforcement radar for both the US and in their home countries. If a retard is caught working with a gang or cartel (that is after the EO marked as a terrorist organization) and ups the ante by marking himself with a symbol that he is a member of said terrorist group, you can't then cry foul that the feds go "Oh I guess it's even more obvious this retard is a gangbanger".
Gang squads or their equivalent likely have extensive notes and databases on game symbolism and do their darnedest to keep up with all the variations. Anyone thinking otherwise has cobwebs where their gray matter
should be.
Bottom line for the activists is their belief that once illegals get a temporary stay to remain in the US, it's some sort of anti-deportation armor for the rest of their lives.
(Edited for spelling and clarity.)
