- Joined
- Mar 13, 2025
I don't think there should be legal consequences, but I do think people should learn to distrust these people. He has a degree, but I don't think he is a practicing therapist or anything. Maybe I am wrong. I think you do have to be licensed in order to give someone a diagnosis, but it differs depending on what is being diagnosed. I've heard that they've expanded what kinds of medical care providers can diagnose autism.Isn't there an ethical code about not diagnosing people who are not your patients? Maybe that's just a psychiatrist thing, not a psychologist thing.
Kirk Honda isn't giving a formal diagnosis, he is just giving his opinion. Anyone can do that. Lawtube does this all the time. What I have an issue with is the way narcissistic self absorbed people weaponize "experts" like Kirk Honda to deflect criticism or attack others with impunity, because our society is so infantilized and there is special credence given to "therapy" (they never specify what kind of therapy or methodology). Ethan and Ian both weaponize mental health and emulating how therapists talk to ignore criticism.
As much as I hate praising academics, YouTube "experts" also should not be taken seriously and rarely have any valuable experience or real research under their belt. Nick Rekieta was an incompetent lawyer who became wildly popular despite not knowing the law that well and having so many personal issues.He’s what psychologists call “rent a quote” in the UK. Academics are super bitchy and jealous but usually right in their cuntiness.