US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So can they actually win battles or do they just torment people who can't fight back?

With each other and the Mexican military, yes.
they 'fight' by subverting mexican state power structures (police, military, government, administration) through bribery, extortion and intimidation.
if mexico had a leadership like el salvador under bukele then these cartels would crumble to dust very quickly. organized crime cannot stand up against a determined security force. but as long as the countrys rulers remain as corrupt and inept as they are, the narcos are free to terrorize the population as they see fit.
 
The press is calling this image "doctored"

I suspect the letters and numbers on the knuckles are added to show the meaning of the tattoos, like "marijuana" for M, Smiley face for S etc. but of course the news jumps on it to imply the whole image was faked
 
history is cyclical after all
if you notice your own quote brings up japan/korea

but the main reason the broccoli cut is like that is that most zoomers are a type of mutt and especially a lot more arab than other generations meaning curly hair is the norm. its like how every nigger in the 1980s had curly hair. yet no older blacks really mocked it and mainly mocked the hair care that kept the Jheri curl in place.

its the same reason zoomers are more likely to wear chains or use the term bro now, 30 years ago you'd mainly see it in arab communities but now that everyone is a race mixxed mutt or a white kid that doesn't want to feel left out they're also broccoli haired chain wearing "bros"
 
no, the trump admin is talking about privatizing shit, and the democrats should be yellin about that instead of gangbangers
It is bizarre that the media whores ignore a real easy subject to smear the Trump administration that could appeal to both political wings (albeit for different reasons) and focus on some illgeal spic gang bangers. They must have really banked on turning them into voter chattel to secure every election in the future.
 
>Goes to Ukraine.
>Becomes active Combatant.
>What NATO war crimes?

And people wonder why rest of the world hates America... This shit right here.
Shouldn't this be a huge deal? I know the U.S. has been tacitly supporting Ukraine against Russia, but a Congressman going out to Ukraine and, by his own words, killing members of the Russian military a huge act of aggression?
I would imagine that in older times, there'd be immediate demands to hand the Congressman over to Russia, or else they're declaring war.

This is absolute lunacy. I know the gambit is to have Trump's administration arrest him, so they can say "LOOK TRUMP IS ARRESTING OPPOSING CONGRESSMEN ON BEHALF OF PUTIN!!!" but this seems like something that needs to be addressed.
 
The press is calling this image "doctored"

I suspect the letters and numbers on the knuckles are added to show the meaning of the tattoos, like "marijuana" for M, Smiley face for S etc. but of course the news jumps on it to imply the whole image was faked
It's pretty easy to tell that they're just labels for the symbols, yes. The State Dept and the judges who ruled on this guy earlier aren't stupid and made the obvious connection that 4 symbols all in a row below the knuckles probably mean something. I don't necessarily know the truth one way or another about this specific guy but it's hilarious that the people constantly talking about crypto-Nazi symbols are befuddled that gang members often hide their affiliation and the State Dept has to keep autistic, constantly updated records on these symbols.
 
Last edited:
In Ancient Republican Rome, not only did the magistrates not get paid, but they had to fund out of pocket all their functions, eg. festivals, their entourage, etc
That had its own issues, because after their term of office ended praetors and consuls would get a governorship as a propraetor or proconsul and immediately set about acting as corrupt as possible to suck all the money they could out of their assigned province to pay their debts back. It also encouraged only rich people to run in the first place, although I guess that is admittedly an issue in America too considering our campaign costs. The Roman system of mandating that you can only run for the same office again after a specific amount of time should be the actual model for fixing how broken the Senate and the House are. 8-12 years before you can run for another term sounds fair.
 
Genuinely surprised there aren't more viral clips about the 250th anniversary, like why the fuck didn't someone recreate the ride and reenactors literally recreate every fucking thing. because of how many people participated and how many printing shops there are we have a huge catalog of events from that day.

If i was the social media person for boston i would 100% have auto tweets set up so people could follow along in real time all the fucking events. Because if something like that happened today you'd 100% be seeing accounts posting all over the fucking city about whats going on, like its such a simple lay up, especially when 1. its iconic and 2. its a lot easier to follow vs a battle on a hill that's probably filled with million dollar condos or takes place on fucking christmas.
Because the people running those accounts hate Americans. Why would they promote pride in a country they are actively and openly trying to destroy?
 
The Roman system of mandating that you can only run for the same office again after a specific amount of time should be the actual model for fixing how broken Congress and the House are. 8-12 years before you can run for another term sounds fair.
The Roman system worked for millennia because it forced consensus and acted against temporary moods or impulses. When you have two consuls who can stonewall each other, as well as ten tribunes any one of whom could do the exact same, it forces action only when broad consensus is created and ignores transitory fads and ideas in the populace, hence the stability of the system. It is why the US was designed with separation of powers, federalism, and procedures such as the filibuster. It's why Europe is cracking at the seams with a system based around legislative supremacy and unitary governments.

It also encouraged only rich people to run in the first place, although I guess that is admittedly an issue in America too considering our campaign costs.
When France adopted paying representatives instead of requiring they fund themselves, it destroyed the cohesion of the socialist party and co-oped legislators into the centrist political mainstream.
 
In Ancient Republican Rome, not only did the magistrates not get paid, but they had to fund out of pocket all their functions, eg. festivals, their entourage, etc
Sure. In a perfect world, Id say anyone serving the federal government had to agree to getting their assets frozen for the duration, living full time in dc because traveling back to their districts is performative and if they care about their constituents, they could read their fucking email, etc etc, and live in monastic dormitories without any opportunity for their money to provide them special comfort or privilege, all the better to contemplate their actions

But I think it would be a hard sell
 
The Roman system worked for millennia
it didn't.
rome was a republic for around five centuries, and the last of those was plagued by instability and political violence, including multiple civil wars and military dictatorships by men such as sulla, caesar, and eventually octavian/augustus who put the final nail in the coffin of the republic.
 
With each other and the Mexican military, yes.
Not even the mexican military in a straight up fight. They just threaten/bribe politicians who force the military to stand down. Cartels are the biggest cowards in the world.
 
it didn't.
rome was a republic for around five centuries, and the last of those was plagued by instability and political violence, including multiple civil wars and military dictatorships by men such as sulla, caesar, and eventually octavian/augustus who put the final nail in the coffin of the republic.
Even counting only the republic, name a republic today that lasted five centuries.
 
The Roman system worked for millennia because it forced consensus and acted against temporary moods or impulses. When you have two consuls who can stonewall each other, as well as ten tribunes any one of whom could do the exact same, it forces action only when broad consensus is created and ignores transitory fads and ideas in the populace, hence the stability of the system. It is why the US was designed with separation of powers, federalism, and procedures such as the filibuster. It's why Europe is cracking at the seams with a system based around legislative supremacy and unitary governments.
The Republic didn't last for millennia, in the empire all the Republican offices were for flunkeys of the emperor who didn't do much. Offices being filled by at least two people was a great idea, as was the general idea of having to move up the ladder, age requirements and limits before you could run for a certain office again, the problem was that none of this was written down. The Roman constitution was only upheld by tradition and laws, which meant that there was chaos when people just chose to ignore the traditions. Having the powers and requirements for offices actually be enumerated in writing was the genius of the founding fathers, they knew a general idea of separation of powers and a pinky promise to uphold it wasn't enough. The Bill of Rights was also ingenious, but that was borne more out of enlightenment thinking than anything else. Their only mistake was not instituting term limits or a fixed time before you could run for certain offices again. That was fixed with the president thanks to an amendment but it long ago should have been fixed for the other parts of the government as well.
 
Even counting only the republic, name a republic today that lasted five centuries.
San Marino is the only such country that has lasted so long. It has stuck around due to a generally homogeneous population, the benevolence of governments around it and refusing to expand in size in order not to make itself a target of foreign revanchists.
 
Guess it's time for me to do my manly duties and think of Rome.
Republican Rome failed because the Senate became more and more removed from the common citizen(aka the poor) and neglected their needs and wants. While left them grasping for any representation, which people like Caesar used to gain power.

To bring this to the 21st century, the Dems and NeoCons are doing the same thing, working more for their interest than the peoples.
 
Back
Top Bottom