Hooked on phobics
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2023
Oh how the mouthy have fallen. Glad someone highlighted this or I would of missed it.Alyssa, for lack of a real journalism career, has taken work at a restaurant.
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | May 13, 2026 | ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to unseal ECF 92. Defendant is directed to file an appropriately redacted version of ECF 88 by 5/21/2026. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi on 5/14/2026. (SW) | |
| 93 | May 12, 2026 | Letter re: Sealing Status of Various Documents, per the Court's Request by Alyssa Mercante (Attachments: (1) Exhibit Attachment: Redacted Version of ECF No. 91.) (Green, Remy) | |
| — | May 11, 2026 | ||
| — | May 11, 2026 | MINUTE ENTRY AND ORDER: A telephonic motion hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Eshkenazi on 5/11/2026. Appearances by Remy Green for Plaintiff, and Ronald Coleman for Defendant. The parties discussed Defendant's objections to Plaintiff's Rule 37 fees. As discussed on the record, Defendant will make an offer on the fees by close of business on 5/12/2026. Plaintiff will respond to Defendant's offer by close of business on 5/13/2026. The parties are directed to file a joint status letter on 5/15/2026, indicating whether judicial intervention, including a settlement conference, is necessary. Defense counsel also stated his intent to cover the costs of Plaintiff's counsel resulting from the unredacted filing of ECF 88. The parties' 5/15/2026 status letter shall include any update on the payment of those costs. | |
| — | May 11, 2026 | MINUTE ENTRY AND ORDER: A telephonic motion hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Eshkenazi on 5/11/2026. Appearances by Remy Green for Plaintiff, and Ronald Coleman for Defendant. The parties discussed Defendant's objections to Plaintiff's Rule 37 fees. As discussed on the record, Defendant will make an offer on the fees by close of business on 5/12/2026. Plaintiff will respond to Defendant's offer by close of business on 5/13/2026. The parties are directed to file a joint status letter on 5/15/2026, indicating whether judicial intervention, including a settlement conference, is necessary. Defense counsel also stated his intent to cover the costs of Plaintiff's counsel resulting from the unredacted filing of ECF 88. The parties' 5/15/2026 status letter shall include any update on the payment of those costs.For the reasons discussed on the record, the parties are also directed to file a joint status letter on 5/13/2026, updating the Court as to whether any docket entries should be unsealed.The Court also discussed Plaintiff's 89 Motion for an Order to Show Cause. The Court declines to issue an Order to Show Cause at this time in light of the Courts on the record warning to Defendant's counsel of his obligations to (1) exercise due diligence when citing case law, (2) exercise due diligence when filing sensitive information on the docket, and (3) refrain from filing any documents on the docket designated as "confidential" regardless of counsel's disagreement with the designation. As discussed on the record, defense counsel is directed to follow all procedures set forth in the Protective Order (ECF 34) for challenging any confidentiality designations. Failure to meet these obligations in the future may result in sanctions. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for an Order to Show Cause 89 is denied. (MED) |