YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I want you to stare at this thumbnail.
Screenshot_2209.png
 
I know it's probably paraphrasing Wikipedia, but why the need to add that the prison where human experiments were conducted was primarily black inmates (which is the norm anyways)? Is the implication that if those were done only to White inmates it would have been more moral?
 
I'd argue the US could win a nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis as well (he overestimates the role of early ICBMs), but great video regardless.
 
Some nigger in timeghost crew destroyed SD card with multiple videos on it . How do you even manage to do such thing I will never know.
Every single World War ii historian is the most politically illiterate retired on the face of the planet and literally just a propagandist for current geopolitics at this point also side chant with literally just FD R's propaganda broadcast FDI was literally a tyrant and a psychopath
All the arguments lefty types use for the bombing of Dresden sounds no different then the arguments Israel uses for bombing of civilian targets in Gaza.
Yes a left ist have no principles news at 11 also feted cheese as admitted that he's a propagandist so I don't know why anybody takes him seriously
 

Every single World War ii historian is the most politically illiterate retired on the face of the planet and literally just a propagandist for current geopolitics at this point also side chant with literally just FD R's propaganda broadcast FDI was literally a tyrant and a psychopath
Zoomer Historian reminds me of Academic Agent given their foaming over Churchill.

Churchill Derangement Syndrome is real, though the man was no angel IRL, either.
 
Zoomer Historian reminds me of Academic Agent given their foaming over Churchill.

Churchill Derangement Syndrome is real, though the man was no angel IRL, either.
I disagree. AA is a (half-)brit, he hates Churchill because he (correctly) identifies his policies with the decline of the British Empire. Zoomer Historian hates Churchill because millennial/zoomer /POL/tards are as obsessed with WWII hagiography as boomers and adopt the opposite of what they were taught in public school out of a combination of spite and basic scrutiny.

If anything Null would be a closer comparison. He defaults to the 'half of all women voted for Hitler' talking point in his woman rants, as if there aren't any other historical examples he could draw on and telling the people disagree with him that white women voted for someone who wound up killing millions of white men will somehow make them more well-disposed to women's suffrage.
 
If anything Null would be a closer comparison. He defaults to the 'half of all women voted for Hitler' talking point in his woman rants, as if there aren't any other historical examples he could draw on and telling the people disagree with him that white women voted for someone who wound up killing millions of white men will somehow make them more well-disposed to women's suffrage.
I'm actually of the opinion that women suffrage is wrong because it's simply a upper middle class plot against rocking class and middle class people to devalue labor
 
I'm actually of the opinion that women suffrage is wrong because it's simply a upper middle class plot against rocking class and middle class people to devalue labor
Also Middle and lower class women always worked. It's just upper class trustfund girlies who didn't work (or at useless make work jobs like running societies and different NGOs, the same as they do now with the "Day in the Life" corpo videos)

Everyone always jokes that the real boss (in actual productive companies) is your boss's wife. There is a reason for that.
 
If anything Null would be a closer comparison. He defaults to the 'half of all women voted for Hitler' talking point in his woman rants, as if there aren't any other historical examples he could draw on and telling the people disagree with him that white women voted for someone who wound up killing millions of white men will somehow make them more well-disposed to women's suffrage.
He's just a racist feminist at the end of the day, when you accept that, basically all his inane takes make sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom