Montagraph is in December. If he wins because of that, Null will have to declare martial law. It'll be a December surprise bigger than MANdy. With all the resultant salt.
I'm leaning on the probability it'll go to Destiny because I feel like Null will put Nick in the HOF so he won't be eligible. That's only if Nick doesn't do anything incredibly stupid that can manage to top what he did last year and prevent Null from opting out of including him (like getting arrested again), because Nick was on a roll for content last year.
Nick losing his shit in December after the verdict Montagraph trial (if it does happen) would be the third time something in December pushed him over...so that's a maybe.
If Nick wins as unambiguously as he did last year, it'll have to be through a combination of events previously mentioned that have yet to happen (but could).
You don't even have to be a lawyer to grasp how full of shit Barnes is.
Kurt, for all his faults and flaws, did the simplest takedown of Barnes' opinions throughout the initial controversy. He thinks Barnes' is a bad legal commentator because he takes how he thinks the law should work (through his personal interpretation of the Constitution) and says that it's the way it definitely works. Like somehow saying that the amendment that prevents unreasonable bonds means that all bonds are illegal, which obviously is stupid on its face: if unreasonable bonds can exist and infringe on your rights, that necessarily means reasonable ones that don't infringe on your rights not only exist, but are therefore explicitly permitted.
Aren't there recordings of Nick calling Monty a pedo who always liked sucking off little boys, but also recordings of Nick blatantly denying he ever said that?
It's close and you're technically right and also wrong. Null asked Nick if he called Monty a pedophile (or of performing pedophilia acts, the exact verbiage is irrelevant because you can get what I mean) and Nick claimed he "probably" didn't, so Null went and checked for himself and was disgusted at how unambiguously he did exactly what Monty accused him of doing.
I don't remember him publicly denying it or admitting he was wrong (that'd be really bad if he openly said it wasn't true but did it anyways, so he refuses to admit it's false), because his argument has gotten substantially worse (which can only be resolved through discovery): his statement is now:
a) I know he's a pedophile,
b) he has to prove I've damaged him
c) Monty has to prove how he's not a pedophile.
And while I'm pretty confident in my recollection, I think there's a fourth claim at this point that will need extra verification, which is:
d) Monty knows I'm right, because he has already sued someone for this and lost, and he lost because it's true.
I just think what Barnes did to Sean is gross. I think what he did to Andrew was even worse (and I'm not really a fan of Andrew).
Accusing someone through implication of being a pedophile is Nick-tier shit, and fucking foul. Bring back duelling.
Would Nick lick them in an extremely gay way?
All Nick knows how to do is neglect his keedz, punch his head, karaoke, be gay, eat single Dorito chip & lie.
If his mouth is open it is to lie or suck cocks. Nothing else he does with it after the fact could be heterosexual.
. Remember, the last coke stream was brought on just by losing a dodgy interlocutory appeal in this case- just imagine what a full L will do to ol Balldoman!
