US Trump announces sweeping new tariffs to promote US manufacturing, risking inflation and trade wars - President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday a 10% baseline tax on imports from all countries

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1743629549137.png

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday a 10% baseline tax on imports from all countries and higher tariff rates on dozens of nations that run trade surpluses with the United States, threatening to upend much of the architecture of the global economy and trigger broader trade wars.

Trump held up a chart while speaking at the White House, showing the United States would charge a 34% tax on imports from China, a 20% tax on imports from the European Union, 25% on South Korea, 24% on Japan and 32% on Taiwan.

The president used aggressive rhetoric to describe a global trade system that the United States helped to build after World War II, saying “our country has been looted, pillaged, raped, plundered” by other nations.

Trump declared a national economic emergency to launch the tariffs, expected to produce hundreds of billions in annual revenues. He has promised that factory jobs will return back to the United States as a result of the taxes, but his policies risk a sudden economic slowdown as consumers and businesses could face sharp price hikes on autos, clothes and other goods.

“Taxpayers have been ripped off for more than 50 years,” Trump said in remarks at the White House. “But it is not going to happen anymore.”

Trump was fulfilling a key campaign promise as he imposed what he called “reciprocal” tariffs on trade partners, acting without Congress through the 1977 International Emergency Powers Act in an extraordinary attempt to both break and ultimately reshape America’s trading relationship with the world.

The president’s higher rates would hit foreign entities that sell more goods to the United States than they buy, meaning the tariffs could stay in place for some time as the administration expects other nations to lower their tariffs and other barriers to trade that it says have led to a $1.2 trillion trade imbalance last year.

The tariffs follow similar recent announcements of 25% taxes on auto imports; levies against China, Canada and Mexico; and expanded trade penalties on steel and aluminum. Trump has also imposed tariffs on countries that import oil from Venezuela and he plans separate import taxes on pharmaceutical drugs, lumber, copper and computer chips.

None of the warning signs about a falling stock market or consumer sentiment turning morose have caused the administration to publicly second-guess its strategy, despite the risk of political backlash as voters in last year’s election said they wanted Trump to combat inflation.

Senior administration officials, who insisted on anonymity to preview the new tariffs with reporters ahead of Trump’s speech, said the taxes would raise hundreds of billions of dollars annually in revenues. They said the 10% baseline rate existed to help ensure compliance, while the higher rates were based on the trade deficits run with other nations and then halved to reach the numbers that Trump presented in the Rose Garden.

In a follow-up series of questions by The Associated Press, the White House could not say whether the tariff exemptions on imports worth $800 or less would remain in place, possibly shielding some imports from the new taxes.

Based on the possibility of broad tariffs that have been floated by some White House aides, most outside analyses by banks and think tanks see an economy tarnished by higher prices and stagnating growth.

Trump would be applying these tariffs on his own; he has ways of doing so without congressional approval. That makes it easy for Democratic lawmakers and policymakers to criticize the administration if the uncertainty expressed by businesses and declining consumer sentiment are signs of trouble to come.

Heather Boushey, a member of the Biden White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, noted that the less aggressive tariffs Trump imposed during his first term failed to stir the manufacturing renaissance he promised voters.

“We are not seeing indications of the boom that the president promised,” Boushey said. “It’s a failed strategy.”

Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., said the tariffs are “part of the chaos and dysfunction” being generated across the Trump administration. The chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee stressed that Trump should not have the sole authority to raise taxes as he intends without getting lawmakers’ approval, saying that Republicans so far have been “blindly loyal.”

“The president shouldn’t be able to do that,” DelBene said. “This is a massive tax increase on American families, and it’s without a vote in Congress ... President Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would lower costs on day one. Now he says he doesn’t care if prices go up — he’s broken his promise.”

Even Republicans who trust Trump’s instincts have acknowledged that the tariffs could disrupt an economy with an otherwise healthy 4.1 % unemployment rate.

“We’ll see how it all develops,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. “It may be rocky in the beginning. But I think that this will make sense for Americans and help all Americans.”

Longtime trading partners are preparing their own countermeasures. Canada has imposed some in response to the 25% tariffs that Trump tied to the trafficking of fentanyl. The European Union, in response to the steel and aluminum tariffs, put taxes on 26 billion euros’ worth ($28 billion) of U.S. goods, including on bourbon, which prompted Trump to threaten a 200% tariff on European alcohol.

Many allies feel they have been reluctantly drawn into a confrontation by Trump, who routinely says America’s friends and foes have essentially ripped off the United States with a mix of tariffs and other trade barriers.

The flip side is that Americans also have the incomes to choose to buy designer gowns by French fashion houses and autos from German manufacturers, whereas World Bank data show the EU has lower incomes per capita than the U.S.

“Europe has not started this confrontation,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. “We do not necessarily want to retaliate but, if it is necessary, we have a strong plan to retaliate and we will use it.”

Italy’s premier, Giorgia Meloni, on Wednesday reiterated her call to avoid an EU-US trade war, saying it would harm both sides and would have “heavy” consequences for her country’s economy.

Because Trump had hyped his tariffs without providing specifics until Wednesday, he provided a deeper sense of uncertainty for the world, a sign that the economic slowdown could possibly extend beyond U.S. borders to other nations that would see one person to blame.

Ray Sparnaay, general manager of JE Fixture & Tool, a Canadian tool and die business that sits across the Detroit River, said the uncertainty has crushed his company’s ability to make plans.

“There’s going to be tariffs implemented. We just don’t know at this point,” he said Monday. “That’s one of the biggest problems we’ve had probably the last — well, since November — is the uncertainty. It’s basically slowed all of our quoting processes, business that we hope to secure has been stalled.”

https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-liberation-day-2a031b3c16120a5672a6ddd01da09933 (Archive)
 
It’s a retarded idea, through & through. The best reasoning for these tariffs being “well they did it to us!” shows exactly how much thought was really put behind this scorched-earth BS.
Trump has been a protectionist on American Economics since the 80s. Tariffs are literally the issue he has the most consistent on since he's been a public figure commenting on politics. Maybe the anti-tariff crowd would get more traction if they could actually demonstrate that they don't just get their political and economic takes from Reddit and Tik Tok.
 
I need to stock up on my Thai sriracha.
Everyone's favorite cock sauce is actually made in California. Unless of course you're buying the actual top quality Thai stuff, but if that's the case you can easily eat the tariffs.
But I believe Russia, Cuba, North Korea, and Belarus were completely left out.
I could have sworn we've got strict embargoes against all of those countries.
 
We should raise tarrifs against Canada to 10000% and nuke Toronto.

But I believe Russia, Cuba, North Korea, and Belarus were completely left out.
These nations are our true allies, time to end sanctions against them and commence building a Trump Hotel in Pyongyang. God Bless America.
 
And yet we still trade with them. At a deficit, which apparently seems to be Trump’s big bug up his ass except for these cases. 🤷‍♂️
I'm pretty sure our trade with Russia is in single digit billions and is a fraction of a percent of America's actual trade. It's basically a rounding error in trillions of dollars worth of trade. I'm sure that if we lifted the sanctions on Russia we'd hit them with tariffs too, but I know Team NAFO is low IQ anti-Semitism, but with Russians.
 
I'm pretty sure our trade with Russia is in single digit billions and is a fraction of a percent of America's actual trade. It's basically a rounding error in trillions of dollars worth of trade. I'm sure that if we lifted the sanctions on Russia we'd hit them with tariffs too, but I know Team NAFO is low IQ anti-Semitism, but with Russians.
My jimmies aren‘t especially rustled since I tend to be on the slightly less retarded side of that particular slap fight, just noting the facts. There are nations with smaller deficits that did get tariffed even.
 
My jimmies aren‘t especially rustled since I tend to be on the slightly less retarded side of that particular slap fight, just noting the facts. There are nations with smaller deficits that did get tariffed even.
It's also entirely possible that what little trading is going on is over things we don't really compete with Russia over or foodstuff and such. I just think it's probably that tariffs wouldn't actually make a difference at this point. Like with Cuba. And, of course, it's like Penguinland, shiny car keys to dangle in front of dumb fuck journalists.
 
The hell are we importing from Turkmanistan? Alabai puppies? Stories about their lolcow dictators?
Everyone's favorite cock sauce is actually made in California. Unless of course you're buying the actual top quality Thai stuff, but if that's the case you can easily eat the tariffs.
I buy the Shark brand. Never cared for the rooster sauce kind of sriracha. The big bottles last me a year, so the extra cost probably won't hurt too much. Still sucks that the price may increase. Hopefully the product of Japan Kewpie mayo doesn't skyrocket in price. I might learn how to make it myself if it does. I will not settle for the Americanized version that isn't even close to the same thing.
 
Trump has been a protectionist on American Economics since the 80s. Tariffs are literally the issue he has the most consistent on since he's been a public figure commenting on politics. Maybe the anti-tariff crowd would get more traction if they could actually demonstrate that they don't just get their political and economic takes from Reddit and Tik Tok.
You can be protectionist, no one’s really mad about that (no one with common sense, at least). What’s retarded is saying “to hell” with global trade and imposing the ridiculous tariffs Trump’s seemingly pulled out of his ass.

Realistically, how do you expect America to meet the demand that China & similar countries have been able to meet for raw materials and low-quality goods while producing quality jobs with decent benefits domestically when China, for example, has the equivalent of the US population working for pocket change and belly button lint? Do you think we’re gonna have 10,000 seamstresses earning $30 an hour making SHEIN dresses? Or are we expecting people to surrender their freedoms and serve as niggercattle, pulling 16 hour shifts?

America is a service economy, not one that should be devolving and focusing on manufacturing just to satisfy the sense of patriotism that Trump’s used as a tool to garner sympathizers. There’s a reason we moved on from a majority of unskilled factory jobs, and it’s because they were no longer financially viable. Tariffs aren’t going to change the simple fact that these third-world countries can produce materials for much cheaper because they essentially use slave labor.
 
You can be protectionist, no one’s really mad about that (no one with common sense, at least). What’s retarded is saying “to hell” with global trade and imposing the ridiculous tariffs Trump’s seemingly pulled out of his ass.
Trump's been talking about tariffs for almost 40 years, this shouldn't be a surprise.

Realistically, how do you expect America to meet the demand that China & similar countries have been able to meet for raw materials and low-quality goods while producing quality jobs with decent benefits domestically when China, for example, has the equivalent of the US population working for pocket change and belly button lint? Do you think we’re gonna have 10,000 seamstresses earning $30 an hour making SHEIN dresses? Or are we expecting people to surrender their freedoms and serve as niggercattle, pulling 16 hour shifts?
These are tariffs, not embargos. The cost of things will go up, ideally until domestic production is viable. Won't happen over night, but we're already starting to unmothball lumber yards and paper mills in Maine.

America is a service economy, not one that should be devolving and focusing on manufacturing just to satisfy the sense of patriotism that Trump’s used as a tool to garner sympathizers. There’s a reason we moved on from a majority of unskilled factory jobs, and it’s because they were no longer financially viable. Tariffs aren’t going to change the simple fact that these third-world countries can produce materials for much cheaper because they essentially use slave labor.
Sex and gender are binaries, but most other things in the world are not. Embrace the power of And, America's economy doesn't have to be just service or just fake e-mail jobs moving numbers on spreadsheets. We can manufacture as well as having a service and financial sector, this isn't an either/or thing. And don't give me shit about our economy "devolving" for wanting factory work back, I live in the Rust Belt, I've seen what your "evolved" economy has done to the people and town through here.

You do understand the entire point of tariffs is to raise the prices on foreign goods to balance out the advantage of cheap foreign labor, right? You tariff the bugmen until their slave labor doesn't matter. NATFA, first Bush, Slick Willy, these things created this problem and if we have to slap the tiny dicked Han Shinajin with increasing tariffs to counter that, so be it.
 
The whole point of what I'm saying is America will never be able to catch up with China's manufacturing power while creating high-quality jobs in that industry. There's a reason we trade with other countries in the first place. We trade with China because they have a viable manufacturing economy, and the reason China has such a viable manufacturing economy is because they treat the people they employ in that industry as indentured servants.

Let me put it to you like this:

Trump puts a 50% tariff on Chinese imports.

Chinese manufacturers pay their unskilled laborers $2 a day. A shitty toy car made in China that once cost $1 now costs $1.50.

America manufactures that same exact shitty toy car, but they pay their unskilled laborers $20 an hour. That same toy car in America is $5.

In this reality that you've somehow been sold on, the American consumer will 100% pay more for the same product because for some reason we believe that the factories will 'save the West'. Realistically, one of two things happens: the average American consumer cuts their spending in half, choosing to save up money to buy a lower quantity of American products (which will still have a chance of being the same quality as Chinese products) instead of foreign imports (which will probably still be cheaper than domestic, despite the tariffs), or you create a new class of serfs that are worked to the bone to supply demands. Hint: the first is not happening.
 
Last edited:
And don't give me shit about our economy "devolving" for wanting factory work back, I live in the Rust Belt, I've seen what your "evolved" economy has done to the people and town through here.
Lol what did it do? Give you food and a place to live despite having no useful skills? Most people throughout history who are completely useless usually don't get those.
 
The problem with slapping blanket tariffs on every country is that it turns them all against you. Right now we (Canada) placed a tariff on Chinese electric cars to 'protect the domestic EV manufacturers'. We don't have any of those. It was a gesture to Vice President Musk that we'd keep them from outcompeting his bugmobiles up here. Now with a 25 percent tariff on vehicles manufactured in Canada for the American market, we have no reason to keep those tariffs. We can go to President Chinky the Pooh and offer to drop import duties on Chinese vehicles in exchange for them dropping duties on our canola crop, which they buy a lot of. We can offer to drop tariffs on European-made vehicles in exchange for them doing so on specifically Canadian-made ones. There is a whole world of buyers and sellers out there beyond America and if tariffs are going to lower the dollar amount of trade we do with the US, there is no reason not to seek out that same dollar amount of trade with a smaller country.
 
The whole point of what I'm saying is America will never be able to catch up with China's manufacturing power while creating high-quality jobs in that industry.
Based on what? The word of some random internet jackass? Americans can't catch up to small souled bugmen who routinely make buildings out of literal trash, vehicles that routinely explode, and escalators that eat people. You're right, America just can't ever catch up to China, there's an invisible law that declares it such.

In this reality that you've somehow been sold on, the American consumer will 100% pay more for the same product because for some reason we believe that the factories will 'save the West'. Realistically, one of two things happens: the average American consumer cuts their spending in half, choosing to save up money to buy a lower quantity of American products (which will still have a chance of being the same quality as Chinese products) instead of foreign imports (which will probably still be cheaper than domestic, despite the tariffs), or you create a new class of serfs that are worked to the bone to supply demands. Hint: the first is not happening.
First off, Chinese quality is a joke, everyone knows it's a fucking joke, it's why they can't make the highest end chips and never will. Second, if the best we can do is $5 dollars a widget, then why wouldn't we just raise the tariffs until the Chinese crap widget is also $5? There's some invisible cap on Chinese widget tariffs?

Lol what did it do? Give you food and a place to live despite having no useful skills? Most people throughout history who are completely useless usually don't get those.
Yeah, fuck giving most of the population an actual job that produces something. Those useless Rust Belters should just hurry up and OD from Fent.
 
Trump has been a protectionist on American Economics since the 80s. Tariffs are literally the issue he has the most consistent on since he's been a public figure commenting on politics. Maybe the anti-tariff crowd would get more traction if they could actually demonstrate that they don't just get their political and economic takes from Reddit and Tik Tok.
It would probably also help them if every other country wasn’t using tarrifs
 
Back
Top Bottom