US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Smaller nations sell citizenship, some only for $250,000. I’m okay with us letting wealthy civilized foreigners in. Better than the subhumans who just consume gibs and harm the American people.
There better be a clause in that gold card program that revokes it if you interfere with our politics.
 
I learned this: Harry Sisson is not even an American. He's a Singaporean born Irish (EU) faggot. He can't actually vote in the US. I want to make a joke about immigrants doing the jobs Americans don't want to do, but Patrick Tomlinson does it for free.

Born in Singapore, then lived in Dubai, then Ireland and moved to the United States for high school apparently. Probably fair to say he has some wealthy parents. It's funny he had so many options and he decided the best thing for him to do was to be a liberal propagandist.
 
Now that it has been a few days since Trump challenged the authenticity of the last day pardons, did Biden reply yet? It would be an easy shot at Trump to immediately come out and say "I approved those". But the silence really seems like Trump was right and has proof.
 
Now that it has been a few days since Trump challenged the authenticity of the last day pardons, did Biden reply yet? It would be an easy shot at Trump to immediately come out and say "I approved those". But the silence really seems like Trump was right and has proof.

right now it's all just talk as far as we know.

Trump hasn't tried to charge anyone "Biden" pardoned in his last day so until he actually does it's all just talk.

Hopefully he's launched the investigations and will wait to see who did what before he picks which hill to fight on.
 
Computer, cross reference with data on male virginity and extrapolate.
Majel Barrett Voice: “Societal self-destruct sequence initiated”

The stats are nigh-terminal. I was a late college bloomer myself, but shit is ridiculous for the under 35 crew these days. ~60% of young men report not in a relationship (vs ~30% of young women 🤔) and 42% of never-married singles under 40 say they’ve never had a relationship at all.

Do we have any sort of historical comparison for this? I’m only familiar going back to the Victorian era and even then, most men got married early and the unfuckables at least could seek their fortune maybe knock up an Indio honey in the New World. Today’s equivalent is, what, trying and failing at being a passport bro?
 
Now that it has been a few days since Trump challenged the authenticity of the last day pardons, did Biden reply yet? It would be an easy shot at Trump to immediately come out and say "I approved those". But the silence really seems like Trump was right and has proof.
This is a good point. They're not even trying to preemptively lawfare it or screeching about it on MSNPC or anything. That says to me that they're wondering just what the hell he found or know it's a weak point for them.
 
The reason that governments are hellbent on smothering any mildly right-wing group is because there's more and more disaffected young men that want meaning and they know that the current society wants them to be beaten down paypigs. A new and charismatic young man promising a better future for them if they fight for it has the possibility to fuck up a lot. After all, it's not like things are going to be better for the average man any time soon.
Andrew Tate does have a struggle. Perhaps he should write a book about it.
 
What an absolutely ridiculous notion that an executive agency provides "oversight" over the executive. Who is their boss?

Remind me again who thought this was a good idea? Why is there such a rats nest of unelected officials not answerable to the voters that are apparently in charge of the elected President? Oh right... FDR and LBJ. Man I hope those two are in hell right now.
 
Andrew Tate does have a struggle. Perhaps he should write a book about it.
Tate isn’t that guy. He’ll have a podcast that he’ll charge 500 bucks for, state the obvious, then gamble the money he makes in Vegas. He has no ambition of leadership and that’s the biggest problem with right wing adjacent influencers. They may hate the status quo but they wouldn’t be profitable if it changed.
 
Tate is a faggot who talks all about 'warrior this' and 'warrior that' but probably crossed the street to avoid the recruiters office for the twenty year long war he was perfectly eligible to take part in.
 
Do we have any sort of historical comparison for this? I’m only familiar going back to the Victorian era and even then, most men got married early and the unfuckables at least could seek their fortune maybe knock up an Indio honey in the New World. Today’s equivalent is, what, trying and failing at being a passport bro?
The obvious comparison is to the Mouse Utopia experiments, but I hear that was bullshit sociology and not actually science. China's once child per family policy set up a similar issue, and Jeets have naturally caused a similar issue by being horrid fecal rapegoblins.
 
Back
Top Bottom