| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | May 14, 2026 | STATUS REPORT and Request for Magistrate Judge Settlement Conference re: Rule 37 Sanction Amount by Alyssa Mercante (Green, Remy) | |
| — | May 13, 2026 | ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to unseal ECF 92. Defendant is directed to file an appropriately redacted version of ECF 88 by 5/21/2026. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi on 5/14/2026. (SW) | |
| 93 | May 12, 2026 | Letter re: Sealing Status of Various Documents, per the Court's Request by Alyssa Mercante (Attachments: (1) Exhibit Attachment: Redacted Version of ECF No. 91.) (Green, Remy) | |
| — | May 11, 2026 | ||
| — | May 11, 2026 | MINUTE ENTRY AND ORDER: A telephonic motion hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Eshkenazi on 5/11/2026. Appearances by Remy Green for Plaintiff, and Ronald Coleman for Defendant. The parties discussed Defendant's objections to Plaintiff's Rule 37 fees. As discussed on the record, Defendant will make an offer on the fees by close of business on 5/12/2026. Plaintiff will respond to Defendant's offer by close of business on 5/13/2026. The parties are directed to file a joint status letter on 5/15/2026, indicating whether judicial intervention, including a settlement conference, is necessary. Defense counsel also stated his intent to cover the costs of Plaintiff's counsel resulting from the unredacted filing of ECF 88. The parties' 5/15/2026 status letter shall include any update on the payment of those costs. |
Might have been a troll, but I remember someone on Twitter years ago trying to start a boycott because a European shoe polish had the word 'negra' on it, which I am told is Spanish for 'black'.
I was wondering when her sweeping squad would start to register.
Better give the TLDR when you're done
Ah, the legal nuance of sucking dick. I can't wait to see what Potentially Criminal has to say about this.
tl;dr of their claims
I made this comment as a joke, I didn't expect this to be their legal argument.
From what I understand their entire response is just a plain denial of reality.
Is she the one paying? Considering the choice of a tranny lawyer I was under the assumption this whole thing had been schemed up as an pro-bono activism stunt and/or crowdfunding grift.
Nah she's going private and public cuz she's makin a good number of stupid followers who doesn't wannabe kept outside
When 2025 sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people with a lot of problems, and they're bringing those problems with them.
Why is Alyssa's lawyer asking the judge for guidance whether to do a partial or full motion to move the case along? Isn't that their job?
They are sneaky disingenuous shyster. They are trying to get an idea where the judge is leaning by insinuating that "we could amend and file more, but does it make sense to do all that now or later in the big filing?" They are also probing the judge for an opinion on the sexism argument, trying to find out if the judge is with them on that without actually making a filing laying it out, arguing it and supplementing it with case law.
Thanky, and lmao
Actually, this letter has managed to convince me of something: New York's Bar exam cut score has been too low. Any competent lawyer would have just filed an amended complaint under FRCP 15, if they actually planned on doing so instead of writing this letter.