- Joined
- Mar 15, 2019
Nick is the last person who should be mentioning blenders and servings with the state of how his cooking turns out.
💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2024
Question for the legally-inclined townsfolk (paging @PotentiallyCriminal): If the single photo in question is indeed produced, can Aaron's defence 'flood the field' by producing dozens of other similar lewds that Kayla and Nick gave Aaron as a 'is this your card?Are you 100% sure?' strategy to sufficiently convince the jury that this is all a den of petty degenerates?
Crossposting from the Imholte thread: in the second clip from Keanu's Killstream appearance this week, she remains adamant that the reason they do not have any copy of the photo to produce at all is because it was never actually one of the countless lewds in the private Signal chat (contrary to the complaint's allegation based on the throuple's apparently false statements to police), and she supposedly has texts from Nick and April backing that up. If Keanu is correct, then cross-examination going into a "process of elimination" to prove that the photo in question isn't among the Signal lewds as previously alleged could get spicier than anyone ever imagined:
Whoever his supposed source was definitely wouldn't have been Geno, because Ralph's comments about it yesterday on that prominent Dabbleverse show sure to be a gamechanger (
Now granted, as always with anything coming from Geanu everyone has to put on their "tard whisperer" hat to come to different interpretations, but taking all of the above together I'd submit one interpretation that the plea deal on the table (or at least one of them in the course of various counteroffers) was for a stay of adjudication somewhat similar to Nick's, whereby Aaron would bite the bullet and enter a plea of guilty to the felony but have the case left open with no actual judgment of conviction of the felony, and with an agreement that the felony count would be amended for conviction of the misdemeanor if and when Aaron successfully completes a period of probation.
That would be precisely consistent with what Keanu spontaneously blurted out as if she was told as much at some point, and interestingly it would not be entirely inconsistent with what Ralph has been told if you allow for some finer details having been lost in the proverbial game of telephone. What may have been told to Ralph (or to his sources) was that Aaron would end up with a misdemeanor in the end, which actually would be an accurate description of how a stay of adjudication works, but one or another especially retarded link in the chain of gossip misunderstood that to mean that Aaron would plead to only the misdemeanor in the first instance, and then someone passed along the misunderstanding from there.
If such a stay of adjudication is what Keanu was describing, then on its face it would have been pretty dumb for Aaron to not take that deal either, since all he'd have to do is not fuck up for a couple of years to get rid of the felony. Perhaps he just figured the eventual conviction of the misdemeanor was pretty cold comfort when in the interim even a convictionless plea to the felony could cause problems for the ongoing SafeSport process and/or problems for his "radio guy's" alleged progress in striking a deal for a return to radio that Aaron's been teasing about over the past week without getting into details so as to not "jinx it." Immediate collateral consequences like those could have made a felony plea unacceptable even though it would nominally be temporary, and meanwhile any counteroffer from him for a straight plea to the misdemeanor (even with sentencing concessions to sweeten the pot) could easily have left the state concerned about a known recidivist's amenability to probation without the "teeth" of a stay of adjudication hanging a felony over his head, so off to trial it goes.
Anyway, there were a couple more minor highlights from that show FWIW:
1. While Keanu has already said recently that the photo was taken by Aaron rather than sent in the categorically private Signal chat like the complaint alleged based on apparently false statements in the Rekietas' police report, she is definitely doubling down on that and added some detail about how the Qover had so many different lewds floating around that identifying the one sent to Geno was like looking for a needle in a haystack, so Nick and April were frantically texting Keanu trying to narrow down which lewd was the one in question, and ultimately they never found out. From the context of Ralph's question that brought up the topic, it sure sounds like Keanu has been given good reason to believe that the photo itself was never recovered forensically and that is why the Biscontes' testimony is so outcome-determinative as to need interstate compulsory process now:
2. So far the Minnesota court's February 11th certificates still don't appear to have scared Geanu into any giving any assurances of voluntary compliance, and they remain defiant until they actually "have to" show up, which still isn't the case until the prosecutors get off their ass and make the necessary filings in New York:
Last edited:
Maybe I am not being clear. They NEED Geno to prove dissemination/publish of the RP. We KNEW from day one, even if Lazy Fat DA subpoena'd text messages it would NOT produce the item texted. BUT just pretend a subpoena did produce the actual photo texted, if indeed it was a photo of anything. WE STILL NEED GENO to testify he received it [keanu did not receive it, nor did any of the triad]. And testify yes that was what he [geno] received on such day at such time. Geno is NOT in Minnesota sooooo MN fat azz stupid woke female DA cannot force him to appear as a witness. DA would have needed to have started an extradition process WAAAAAAAY before now, because extradition takes lots of time, lots of back n forth.
Ralph's nationwide arrest warrant was based on ACTUAL VIOLATION of MN law WHILE Ralph was IN MINNESOTA court stream [He admits while on stream he is streaming the court hearing after judge said DONT on stream]. Ergo, Geno is NOT in same sitch as Ralph. Geno violated NO LAWS in MN, and has no regular contacts/visits/business in MN sooooo the MN stupid and fat DA cannot reach out and touch GENO without Geno Having relationship in some way to the state of MN.
Addict can keep trying to gaslight you guys, but you guys are not addicts nor are you his braindead followers. Just STAWP. What would a judge sign a bench warrant for? Well your honor this stranger in a COMPLETELY different state has had NO CONTACT in MN therefore he has not enjoyed the benefit and protection of our laws, BUT YOUR HONOR we want him to come talk to us for our case that had no legs from day one and is falling apart. but again, this witness has NEVER been in MN. NOT gonna happen, no matter how many puke vomit cream dishes addict serves the judge.
Stop sweeping for addict already.
Just sit back, grab popcorn, and enjoy the testimony of the triad of polycule love, testify ON THE RECORD about sharing each other for sex and drugs WHILE KIDS ARE LIVING IN THEIR POLYCULE LOVE DEN---oh, and a NANNY.
Sounds like the title of a movie.
The polycule, the kids, and the nanny.
Ralph's nationwide arrest warrant was based on ACTUAL VIOLATION of MN law WHILE Ralph was IN MINNESOTA court stream [He admits while on stream he is streaming the court hearing after judge said DONT on stream]. Ergo, Geno is NOT in same sitch as Ralph. Geno violated NO LAWS in MN, and has no regular contacts/visits/business in MN sooooo the MN stupid and fat DA cannot reach out and touch GENO without Geno Having relationship in some way to the state of MN.
Addict can keep trying to gaslight you guys, but you guys are not addicts nor are you his braindead followers. Just STAWP. What would a judge sign a bench warrant for? Well your honor this stranger in a COMPLETELY different state has had NO CONTACT in MN therefore he has not enjoyed the benefit and protection of our laws, BUT YOUR HONOR we want him to come talk to us for our case that had no legs from day one and is falling apart. but again, this witness has NEVER been in MN. NOT gonna happen, no matter how many puke vomit cream dishes addict serves the judge.
Stop sweeping for addict already.
Just sit back, grab popcorn, and enjoy the testimony of the triad of polycule love, testify ON THE RECORD about sharing each other for sex and drugs WHILE KIDS ARE LIVING IN THEIR POLYCULE LOVE DEN---oh, and a NANNY.
Sounds like the title of a movie.
The polycule, the kids, and the nanny.
Last edited:
Melty Butter
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
Interesting. @Folgers Can, your posts are like a gift from the KF gods but they are highly dense so... forgive my basic questions.
- Is the implication that the lewd Aaron sent to Geno is NOT from Signal?
- Does the State even know what pic it is?????????? Sounds like they may not know if the thruple was trying to figure it out.
- If Nick/Kayla/April don't know what photo it is and neither does the State, what's stopping Geanu from denying that there were nipples and genitals? Hence no revenge porn. (We know that Geno has a history of playing dumb when giving witness testimony as per your prior post on Aaron's thread.)
- I know that Keanu (and Geno?) have confessed publicly that Kayla was fully naked... but what's stopping them from denying it on the stand? They can claim they wanted clicks and views and barely looked at the pic.
- Is this an excuse for Aaron to try to get all the Signal lewds into evidence as some effort to show that it was a shit show? (Omg, please make it so.) I know... not likely... but hope springs eternal. Relevant tweet on that topic:
This is all so tiresome. Again, what "expectation of privacy"? Kayla's lewds are everywhere.
Meanwhile, Nick/Kayla are clearly being kept in the dark:
Note: Nick's Twitter thread is full of commentary on this RP case, much of which has not been archived.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
For all the court knows, Aaron sent Geno an AI image. Even Geno wouldn’t be able to say definitively that what he saw wasn’t an AI image. This is all a huge waste of time and resources.
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2024
Lord only knows what she's ever trying to imply and it's just my inference from what she's saying, so YMMV. Based on Nick's ill-advised recent DM leak with a veiled threat that he still has "all the fucking receipts," it would appear that he (or the throuple collectively) have the Signal chat archived. Coupling that with Keanu's revelation that Nick and April were going back and forth with Geanu for more and more detail about the photo precisely because there were "many that we think it could be, but we can't figure out which one it is," it stands to reason that they were taking Geanu's description of the photo and then cross-referencing that against an archive of the Signal chat's lewds in an attempt to pinpoint which particular one it was.
With Keanu adding in present tense that "[t]hey don't even know what the photo is... they don't have it," it would appear that any such attempted cross-referencing against the Signal chat was ultimately unsuccessful, which would make sense if the photo was not in the Signal chat in the first place. She further adds that the reason for this search being unsuccessful was "because" Kayla posed for the photo taken by Aaron, which would not need to have ever made its way into the Signal chat for Aaron to have had it to send to Geno, and it could have been confined to his device until being forever lost when Geno deleted his copy and Aaron's copy wound up in a tragic boating accident.
That said, the biggest flaw to this theory is of course that the only attestation to the Signal chat actually being fully archived is coming from Nick, with only a single partially redacted DM screenshot to corroborate his claim, so it's possible that he was lying about having "all the fucking receipts" and he instead only has fragments of the Signal chat, in which case the cross-referencing against Geanu's description may have only failed because the photo happened to be in some portion of the Signal chat that the throuple failed to archive. We may never know unless Aaron's attorney takes the opportunity to ask about it.
No idea, and from Nick's tweet that you quoted it sounds like Kayla isn't getting much inside information from the state even from the standpoint of a victim that would tend to be kept in the loop somewhat for purposes of preparing for her testimony, but Aaron would know for sure as a result of required disclosures from the state. Whether he told Keanu much about those disclosures is anyone's guess, but considering how she blabbed about plea terms that she could only have learned from him, it wouldn't be surprising if he also blabbed to her about a failure to produce the photo being the reason why she and Geno are getting dragged across state lines.
Judging by Geno's statements in the Judge Dodell interview, the reason they didn't simply recant is because Geno is under the mistaken impression that contradicting their prior unsworn statement to police would be a crime. I hate to agree with Ralph about anything but he had a great point elsewhere in Geanu's Killstream interview that although lying to the FBI is statutorily criminalized (as many laypersons have learned from events in national news over the past decade), that has led to an unfortunate common misconception that it's a crime to lie to police generally, whereas in reality it is typically only a crime to file a false police report and whether any other type of false statement to police is a crime would depend on the jurisdiction.
In this case, just going off the only conceivably pertinent statutes at Minn. Stat. 609.505, 609.506, 609.50, and 609.48, Minnesota is such a jurisdiction that would have been especially forgiving to Geanu had they simply recanted, and still would be should they choose to recant at any given time. Even if they were to wait until they're put under oath on the stand to say for the first time that it was all "just a comedy bit" and Aaron actually sent Geno a photo of Brooke Candy, it's not at all clear that they could be realistically charged with perjury for that matter. How on earth could the state expect to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in the eyes of a unanimous jury that Geanu's May 2025 sworn testimony to the Brooke Candy photo was false and that some unsworn random babbling about a Kayla photo to Saint Cloud PD in a 2024 flustered cell phone call was actually the truth? Unless there is a forensically recovered photo showing the latter to have been true, which there doesn't appear to be, there would never be a prosecutable perjury case. Not a fucking chance. Geno's just a pussy for not recanting, pure and simple.
Even with the "reasonable expectation of privacy" element being a way to shoehorn ample evidence of exhibitionist proclivities outside the Signal chat into the defense strategy as many have suggested, that defense likely wouldn't allow much of a deep dive into what Keanu says are "many" non-disseminated Signal lewds because three witnesses' testimony to the Signal chat having been categorically private would lessen the "many" non-disseminated Signal lewds' probative value and run into Rule 403 objections about the prejudicial impact of victim-blaming, slut-shaming, etc. outweighing the low probative value.
Instead, an alternative path to cross-examination about the "many" non-disseminated Signal lewds would be their effect on challenging witnesses' credibility, which is virtually always fair game: if the throuple flat-out told police that the disseminated lewd was obtained from the Signal chat, and if Keanu's testimony plus Nick's and April's texts to Keanu give reason to believe that the disseminated lewd was not obtained from the Signal chat, then the inference that the throuple made a false report to police (itself a crime per Minn. Stat. 609.505) would form a basis to attack their credibility in that regard. One way to pursue that could be a line of questioning going through an archive of all Signal lewds and asking, one by one, "is this Signal lewd the one that you told police was the one sent to Geno? No? Ok, what about this one? Not this one either? OK, this one then?" Lather, rinse, repeat until all of them are ruled out and the witness looks like a liar.
The biggest problem with this approach is that Aaron claims his tragic boating accident leaves him with no Signal chat archive that his attorney could have used to walk through with the witnesses on cross, so unless he decides to suddenly stumble upon a backup archive stashed on an external hard drive somewhere that he "forgot" about until now, the only option would be serving a subpoena duces tecum on each of the throuple members to obtain copies of any and all portions of the Signal chat that have been archived on their end. There's now a decent shot at that subpoena not being quashed only because Nick was dumb enough to establish a record on Twitter of still having "all the fucking receipts" that Aaron would now have a right to use in his defense. Nothing would be funnier than to see Nick hoisted on his on petard in that way, but Aaron's attorney doesn't seem to be that aggressive and will likely run out of time. The time to try out such a subpoena would have to be right about now with only a couple months left for motion practice on inevitable attempts to quash it at most or bury it with protective order stipulations at least.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
Aaron should walk because it would make his ex boyfriend Nick angry.
Yeah.
But it's ON PAPER
Unbreaded
Touchdown
That is to say, ON TRANSCRIPT PAPER for all the world to see including the fam, did you see all those old peeps in family pictures who will find out about what this perverted abusive parent did while in the home where THOSE BABIES LIVED.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2019
LOL. Also more on this below.
This would be the funniest outcome.
The other thing, if Aaron did take the picture, the metadata on the image sent to Geno was likely removed. (Depends on the app, depends on the carrier, but generally the images are compressed and any extra stuff, including metadata, removed for pics sent over MMS.) The carrier I believe also wouldn't have the metadata if the State was able to recover the photo from the carrier (on the image Aaron sent to Geno). So the only way Aaron can prove he took the photo, becomes a he-said/she-said situation with Kayla. Yes, if the Signal group chat wasn't sunsetted, as it sounds, then they could prove it didn't come from the group chat.
Now, I don't know if the Minnesota law matters that much how Aaron got the image (it seems only to be concerned with the sending of the image), but to the jury it may be a huge difference between "sharing a group message pic" versus "sharing a pic Aaron took".
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
>Aaron said there were no drugs around the kids (that he knows of, convenient to leave this out)
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME??????????? The 8yo had fucking cocaine in her system. Is this niggerfaggot just incapable of stop lying?!! Holy shit!
>Aaron lies
So was he lying or not?
Melty Butter
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
One last issue while we're on the topic.
I would bet a lot of money that Kayla and Nick have sent her nudes (with nips and genitals) to others. The list of possible recipients is long: friends they made in the Locals cult and/or in Vegas and/or Anime Matsuri and/or to the likes of Coomalot. Nick is aware of this problem as well:
Archive
It's an amusing exercise to consider who might have said pics. ArttheClown? EgalitarianBtch? Carimachet? That stripper/pole dancer whose name I'm forgetting? Jamaicans? Have any of these people become detractors?
I doubt Aaron's lawyers have considered this strategy (and I know it's not necessarily relevant to the letter of the RP law)... But, as you said, it IS relevant to Kayla's credibility.
(Nerd moment: RP laws are widely considered to be over-broad. They're so new that they have not been effectively challenged. That said, I highly doubt any MN judge plans to rein it in for the likes of Aaron.)
Edit to Add: The parallel convo related to RP and Destiny is funny. Apparently, Destiny recently wigged out on Mindset and @Potentially Criminal. Mindset's stream this morning on the topic. He mentions the Aaron issue at 36:40.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
I'd rather explore the question if you can claim a picture to be private if it was shared in a group-chat.
- Joined
- May 28, 2024
Based on his past behavior, I wouldn't be surprised if Nick sent "Mandy" both his and Kayla's nudes to try and convince him to a 3some at a meetup
Probably the same thing to actual ethots too
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
You snipped out the immediate follow-up sentence where I said anything Ralph says should be taken with a dump truck full of salt.Whoever his supposed source was definitely wouldn't have been Geno, because Ralph's comments about it yesterday on that prominent Dabbleverse show sure to be a gamechanger (heh) were referring back to when the same topic came up with Geno sitting right there in the Biscontes' Killstream appearance the other day (starting at 4:56:30).
From what I understand, and was told, Ralph did claim before the interview that Geanu told him Aaron passed on pleading guilty to the misdemeanor. However I was quick to point out, if he did say that, it's pretty much meaningless to me. Because Ralph.
My supposition that Aaron was offered a misdemeanor plea, but passed, is based on other things.
I also, admittedly, can not prove what he was offered. It's just a supposition.
Geanu didn't file the report. Nick and/or Kayla did. The police then questioned Geanu to gather supplementary evidence so they could swear out the arrest warrant on Aaron.
So, yeah, I don't know if they could go after Geanu on anything if they simply recanted. Because they were not the ones reporting the crime. Witnesses are notoriously unreliable. There is a reason they are considered the crappiest form of evidence.
My lay reading of 609.505 is that would apply to Nick or Kayla if they lied. Because they filed the report. 609.48 might apply to Geanu if they gave statements under oath, but I dunno if they did.
I am confused why dixieland buckaroo is just making up facts now? Aaron arrest affidavit states picture was sent to group, per junkie/whore/six
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
The records with witness statements does not say that though.
It says that they (the polcycule) communicated via Signal, it does not say they were in a group chat.
It says that Kayla sent nude photographs via Signal, it does not say if it was in a direct message with Aaron or in a group chat.
It also does not say if THIS particular picture that is the topic in this trial was sent to Aaron via Signal, only "photographs".
Nick and April claim "pictures were shared via Signal app", but neither of them state the picture in question was shared via Signal App or that either of them saw it or were able to identify which picture Aaron supposedly sent to Geno.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It's also just wrong, not that this brain-charred drug addict is ever right about anything these days. Expectation of privacy is an element of the offense, so the burden is on the prosecution to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2024
A single person who also received nudes from Kayla would bring that claim into question.
Star Trek eLover TOE the rescue.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
He's not making up facts.
What happened here is Nick is telling two different and seemingly contradictory stories.
In the police report, he says the image in question was shared by Kayla via Signal.
However, he has since said that Aaron took the photo himself.
The issue with that (and I've gone over this) is that it makes no sense that Aaron would have to receive the photo via Signal if he took it himself. He'd have it it on his device. It doesn't add up.
It says that they were sharing shit via Signal and that they collectively agreed to keep it private between them (which is meant to suggest there was an expectation of privacy).
Now whether they were all CCed in these messages at all times, I dunno, but I don't think I would nitpick anybody saying that, as a group, they were sharing images.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2024
That’s so retarded
So his defense is that the cocaine was in his room while the kids were safely playing next room? Are we supposed to argue what the phrase “drugs around kids” means semantically?
God what an insufferable cuck faggot