Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
Seems nice of Hardin to only list the fees that Null actually paid instead of his Fitzpatrick rate of $669. Any idea why he wouldn't have invoiced Russ for the full value of his time?
My retarded take is that Hardin is reading the room. This is a Pro Se retard doing stupid shit. The court is required to sanction him by rule so Hardin comes in with a reasonable and justified number that's not likely to be reduced.

If, on the other hand, Greer had counsel and pulled this shit then it's likely that Hardin could have come in at full rate and included every second he spent and gotten it as a way to smack down the stupidity.
 
I love that Russ's response to being slapped by fees is to go full unresponsive.

Russ, that won't help, you can't turn back now! But rooting for you to get those $225.
I believe from the correspondence and how he handled it that he's going to file something that's essentially "I thought when I objected to the motion the timer stops on the sanctions and I don't have to think about them at all and actually Hardin was badgering me and being mean to me which added to my stress" because he pulled that shit before too.
 
I wonder who "that woman" is?
View attachment 6970633

Based on the 12/5 date, I am guessing it's in reference to this (footnote of ECF 187):

1739296435887.png

This goes back to Greer's original complaint in which he himself admits:

1739296497755.png
1739296594318.png
etc. etc. etc. -- that's the Erika chick, right? The one whose interactions are featured on his Encyclopedia Dramatica page?

Greer is going to respond to this with some plightsperging about how he was waiting for the district judge to rule on his objection and that's why he didn't engage with Hardin because how was he supposed to know that the case was still moving and it's not fair he thought deadlines were paused blah blah blah. Basically what he pulled last year.

He will absolutely 100% be doing this. But his complete failure to communicate with Hardin whatsoever when the fees and costs were sent, especially since he said he would reply after filing his objection, will hopefully work against him.
 
A very reasonable rate that Greer will froth at the mouth at. The court will probably lower it just because. Still will be a lot more painful than russ anticipated through all this...
 
I love that Russ's response to being slapped by fees is to go full unresponsive.

Russ, that won't help, you can't turn back now! But rooting for you to get those $225.
I think he's finally internalising the message that every plightsperge Mr Hardin is forced to answer following a sanction just adds zeros to the bill.

Alas, the silent treatment is only appropriate in a limited number of situations, especially as the plaintiff. I'll let Russ figure out which ones. :)
 
Last edited:
Holy cow, at $300/hour for litigation work, Hardin is REALLY giving Null a sweetheart deal. I know it had been described as such already, but that's practically paralegal rates.

Bless him. If only more people were able and willing to stand up for the Farms like that.
 
5k seems like exactly the right amount to me. At his normal rates it would be into 5 figures and way more likely to attract pity.

5k is an amount that even a pretty poor working person can scrape together, especially with a payment plan.
 
5k is an amount that even a pretty poor working person can scrape together, especially with a payment plan.
Greer's got 14 days to pay it after the judge orders him to. So I guess he's gonna have to go to another payday loan place that he hasn't been sued by if he wants to keep the case going.
 
Greer's got 14 days to pay it after the judge orders him to. So I guess he's gonna have to go to another payday loan place that he hasn't been sued by if he wants to keep the case going.
I thought this too, but the order makes it seem like if the judge is forced to rule on the amount, then the repayment period is discretionary.
Screenshot_20250211-183035.Adblock Browser.png
It's not entirely clear. Either way, Shitlips does not just have 5k going spare.
 
Very reasonable rates based on what Hardin has stated. Under half of what he's entitled to based upon the Fitzpatrick Matrix (IANAL so I was actually a little curious how lawyers determine rates and what's considered reasonable). I also like showing that it's well under what this court has considered fair, as they awarded $400/hr rate prior. Sure I'm a layman of the law, but I find it convincing to say $300/hr is more than reasonable if you said $400/hr is. No matter what gimpy says.
 
Makes it harder to call him a "meanie" when he goes beyond fair in his rates.

Can the judge order him to pay more then Hardin asks for since its below the matrix thing?
 
Is it fair to assume that everyone involved in this lawsuit wants to eat a bullet for one reason or another? The judge now has to read Greer explicitly defying a court order, Greer has to pay Null and Null will never see that money since you can't get blood from a rock. Hardin may be the only one laughing right now.
:story:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom