does he believe people in the office (especially the type that runs errands while on HO) do no slack off? Or does it not count as long as they are in their wagecage cubicle and feel miserable like fatty?
This was discussed on the previous page: Jack is being willfully and
blatantly contrarian, dishonest, obtuse, and childish in his insistence that productivity be defined by a metric other than productivity, while pretending that there are neither consequences for, nor deterrent from, non-productivity unless a producer is non-productive within a production environment Jack is only willing to define as...not being their home.
Jagoff insists that employees
can't be productive if allowed to produce outside of the workplace, despite the workplace being wherever they produce. He refuses to entertain that non-productivity within the workplace exists in the same form of breaks he accuses those within the workplace of taking if their workplace is within their own home. Breaks from work are, to Jack, something acceptable only within the workplace - But that workplace can't be within the home; because otherwise there would be breaks from work taken!
By Jack's own "reasoning" (pronounced reezning), a worker who spends so much time at their workplace that they "live" there - but fail to produce anything - is inherently more productive than a worker efficient enough to be productive where they live...despite both living where they work. He is generalizing something he knows
less than nothing about; because a purely ignorant person would not insist on being wrong to such a ludicrous extent - They would just defer to the production numbers either option yield, rather than insist it comes down purely to controlling where people are allowed to produce. Jack talks all this shit because he wants to feel like somebody's boss.
At the end, Jack admits that he's only opposed to "work from home" as a concept because it was part of the covid conspiracy he claims to have been "right" about. Essentially, he's admitting that, merely because he chose to needlessly politicize the topic, any business practice allowing employees to work from home which proves financially viable to the business somehow undermines Jack's belief in the covid conspiracies he got from his brother - because all that shit is wrapped up together in his head; and it's either "all true" or "all a lie" (whichever makes Jack feel smarter while shitting himself).
This is but another in an endless series of politicized points of controversy Jack will subsequently claim to have been "right" about without being able to recall how. How can a guy who has been correct about
everything start being wrong,
now? You don't just
stop being right about everything - The world would cease to make sense!
