💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Schpoots]

I bet Nick got all his fat jokes from that sketchy weight loss doctor.

 

[Vibralldo]

I bet Nick got all his fat jokes from that sketchy weight loss doctor.

That "weight loss" doctor needs to start taking his own advice

 

[ChromaQuack]

The abstract was ONE paragraph. It says there were 90 kids who went to the ER in a Mediterranean city (Barcelona). Parent(s) of 85 of the 90 kids also provided hair samples (even druggies will help save their kids' lives sometimes, you know - this is not surprising).

: congratulations, you're now 39 abstracts away from being a true and honest expert in the topic.

Also worth noting that the median test result for positive tests in this study was 1.6 ng/mg for children (range of 0.3-5.96) and 1.0 ng/mg for adults (range of 0.3 to 24.3).

Assuming the units for the "over 5000" test result for Nick's child was pg/mg, that is equivalent to over 5.0 ng/mg,

Well, that throws the idea of her testing at over 5000 being a low accidental dosage that came out super hot due to her being a child down the tubes, doesn't it?

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Keenan-5

33 publications, such as,

"Cardiovascular Interactions of Desipramine, Fluoxetine, and Cocaine in Cocaine‐Dependent Outpatients"
"A method for delivery of precise doses of smoked cocaine-base to humans"
"Effects of carbamazepine on acute responses to smoked cocaine-base in human cocaine users"

fun stuff...

A shame he is 7 publications short of being a real coke scholar, he would otherwise be the perfect expert witness for Nicky's case.

 

[Albatrossius]

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Keenan-5

33 publications, such as,

"Cardiovascular Interactions of Desipramine, Fluoxetine, and Cocaine in Cocaine‐Dependent Outpatients"
"A method for delivery of precise doses of smoked cocaine-base to humans"
"Effects of carbamazepine on acute responses to smoked cocaine-base in human cocaine users"

fun stuff...

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Keenan-5

33 publications, such as,

"Cardiovascular Interactions of Desipramine, Fluoxetine, and Cocaine in Cocaine‐Dependent Outpatients"
"A method for delivery of precise doses of smoked cocaine-base to humans"
"Effects of carbamazepine on acute responses to smoked cocaine-base in human cocaine users"

fun stuff

given what's listed under his name on reasearchgate, he's this guy https://abetterwayhealth.center/

It's in Edina, MN.................. Nick gets his stuff from somewhere, and he trusts it... it's tested..................

Once an ecstasy dealer..................?

 

[ChromaQuack]

It's in Edina, MN.................. Nick gets his stuff from somewhere, and he trusts it... it's tested..................

While this is interesting please do use the edit button at the bottom of your posts to add your findings to it, or keep them as a draft until you're 100% certain you don't really have anything much to add to them.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

But it's so obvious once you see it. It's pure Nick. His entire research is an internet search and taking the first thing that agrees with him as scientific gospel.

Oh gosh, is this where Nick's dumb religious takes come from as well?

Oh wait, even Quora isn't THAT stupid...

https://www.quora.com/Wasnt-Jesus-just-a-normal-guy-Why-do-people-say-Jesus-was-the-son-of-God

https://archive.ph/HVV6V

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

Nick Rekieta: Qover Quora Qonsultant.

 

[Oxyjen]

But yeah it’s a good find, it’s possible Nick has been in touch with this guy either on a “fighting the labs” advice tip and/or literally buying drugs from him. He was using ecstasy as well as cocaine according to Aaron.

And yes Quora is and always has been astonishingly weird shit. I must have innocently clicked through there once because it regularly sends me “digest” posts which are 99% weird IT Indians trying to integrate into US society and constructing elaborate psychological rule fantasies about how to deal with police in a traffic stop.

 

[Law]

That "weight loss" doctor needs to start taking his own advice

He identifies as skinny. He's trans fat.

 

[Vibralldo]

Nick Rekieta: Qover Quora Qonsultant.

and Qid Qocaine Qoncierge

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

It's not a random sample;

Didn't say it was, and I'm certainly not arguing a nick-terpretation. 20% of random children are not walking around testing positive for coke. However, 20% of kids in the ER who did NOT have suspected exposure whose parents said, yes, I would like to participate in your study about coke levels in kids and parents, did - at least in the cited study, and the two related ones, was which spanned 15 years.

the sample is preschool children

Up to age 11 in the 2014 study.

whose parents opted into a study at a single hospital which means you can't say "1 in 5 children will test positive" based on that study.

Right. No one but Nick thinks this. No one with a brain would think that 20% of random kids are going to test positive for coke. (Bit his point was about test unreliability, no? Not actuality? Or both/in the alternative?)

It's not clear where Nick pulled the stat from but if it's that his assertion is baseless.

Since nearly 90% of the children who tested positive in the study had parents who also tested positive, it seems that they were exposed in the home as well. What I would like to see is the reverse, the probability of the child testing positive given that a parent tested positive, but that doesn't seem to be reported.

I agree it would be interesting to see a more straightforward review...but I'm not sure this was that far off. There was no suspected exposure in these studies (except a high drug it se area) and the abstract doesn't say all of the parents were coke users or tested positive for it (and 5% of the parents did not provide a hair sample). Invitation to the study occurred before hair samples were taken or tested, so it's as random as ER visitors not showing signs of drug use who agree to join a study about drug-taking can be I suppose.

Also worth noting that the median test result for positive tests in this study was 1.6 ng/mg for children (range of 0.3-5.96) and 1.0 ng/mg for adults (range of 0.3 to 24.3).

Assuming the units for the "over 5000" test result for Nick's child was pg/mg, that is equivalent to over 5.0 ng/mg,

That 5.0 looks around the amount in a baby being raised by 2 admitted crack smokers in another study:

chronic crack exposure in a two-year-old Caucasian girl and her parents, who are self-reported crack smokers. The level of benzoylecgonine, the principal metabolite of cocaine, was determined in segmented hair samples (0 cm to 3 cm from the scalp, and > 3 cm from the scalp) following washing to exclude external contamination. Benzoylecgonine was detectable in high concentrations in the child's hair, at 1.9 ng/mg and 7.04 ng/mg, respectively. Benzoylecgonine was also present in the maternal and paternal hair samples at 7.88 ng/mg and 6.39 ng/mg, and 13.06 ng/mg and 12.97 ng/mg, respectively.

If regular smoke exposure does that to a baby, imagine the exposure to a kid 4x that age to get to similar concentrations.


Couple of interesting points from the later/2014 study on parents/kids in Barcelona:

Paediatric hair testing in this study confirmed that children positivity rate to repeated exposure to drugs of abuse matched to parental positivity rate to the same drug in the paediatric sample positive for 6-MAM and morphine, in the single case positive to methadone, in 69.5% cases positive to cocaine[...], confirming that the first source of paediatric exposure to drugs of abuse are the parents and more in general a risky parental environment.

The results of the present study are in complete agreement with a previous study of 2009 [...w]e attributed the high percentage of positive cases to the fact that the preschool children stay at home with a parent or a caregiver the majority of time, but the present study show that this was not the case since high percentages of paediatric exposure was not only found in preschool children, but also in case of 2–11 years old children.

Concerning exposure to drugs of abuse in paediatric population of this study, it should be said that: firstly external contamination have to be excluded since and extended standardized hair washing was included in the procedure for hair testing. Secondly, as reported by international literature, even if the route(s) of children “passive or active” exposure to drugs of abuse- (e.g., parental consumption in the household, contact with drugs-contaminated surroundings, crawling and putting contaminated objects in the mouth, accidental ingestion), cannot be easily established, contact occurred as proved by positive hair testing with possible risk of subsequent severe intoxications [17,18].

[...]acute exposure to cocaine during childhood is associated with neurologic manifestations such as focal and generalized seizures in children eight years of age and younger and alterations in mental status, including delirium stupor and coma in older children [19], and even death in cases of oral or inhaled routes of intoxication [8],

And

it is well known that paediatric exposure to drugs of abuse is frequently associated with poor child care by the care giver.

In this concern, our previous study showed that parents of cocaine exposed children present, to a significantly higher extent, behavioural patterns with potential harmful effects for the child’s health (e.g., tobacco smoking, cannabis use, benzodiazepines and/or antidepressant use, shorter breastfeeding time). Indeed, a significantly high percentage of those children (11.8%) showed a failure to thrive which would require nutritional assessment and follow-up [9].

The parental risky behaviours are confirmed in the present study: mothers and fathers of children exposed to drugs of abuse smoke more cigarettes and cannabis joints and consume more benzodiazepines and antidepressant drugs.

 

[Albatrossius]

The Dr connected to Rekieta, Dr Bob Keenan's resume goes some interesting places.
Listed as Principal at PBA Inc aka PBA Health

"Pharmacy Buying Association, Inc., doing business as PBA Health, is a prime contractor for the U.S. federal government, specializing in providing pharmaceutical products, medical supplies, and related services to support healthcare programs for veterans. As a for-profit organization registered in SAM.gov since 2007" (he was convicted in 2005, so this is pretty weird, no?)

Someone posted earlier about Nick potentially having/getting access to chemicals..... Well this fella certainly seems to. Even after having an ecstasy lab.... Weird... Some MK lookin' stuff here, or perhaps a simple cult, but they seem connected, and Rekieta seems obsessed.

Also, photo 4, court docs from an old business Elite Weight Management Center, Dr Keenan had the equipment, and was making amphetamines

Phentermine, which he was making then, for "weight loss", is the same drug he's currently selling at the current "weight loss" clinic "A Better Way Health Center"

 

[genericwhitemale]

Nick Rekieta: Qover Quora Qonsultant.

He really does seem like the kind of guy to write answers for questions posed by supremely unhappy, sexually frustrated people who ask shit like "what is it like having a threesome?" or "what is it like being in a polygamous relationship?" and the reply is some five paragraph response by someone who gets off on telling others about their sexual escapades.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

Is there a loophole the government can use to execute Nick?

Sure, just say he's a member of al-Qaeda and order a drone strike by executive order.

 

[Folgers Can]

You were once the highest superchat earner on YT and now you're begging and trying to pay a puppet to notice you???

Implying he has it on camera? Just like he has videos of the church goers admitting to making stuff up?

We knew this time would come. Now Nick's furry little friend claims to be in possession of Nick's surveillance footage from inside his house at the time of the alleged cumfelching episode, and he will be airing it on tonight's show going live in 70 minutes, presumably (?) with any

redacted so as to not "technically" constitute a new revenge porn offense, and presumably (!) with Nick in chat to savor the attention:

[X] [A]

I must admit that I'm not the sort of "social media expert" that could comprehend the timing of Nick's galaxygas-brained maneuvers like this. Don't you have to actually have your plea deal formally entered into the record and accepted by the judge before the appearance of witness intimidation truly ceases to be an issue?

 

[Vibralldo]

The Dr connected to Rekieta, Dr Bob Keenan's resume goes some interesting places.
Listed as Principal at PBA Inc aka PBA Health

"Pharmacy Buying Association, Inc., doing business as PBA Health, is a prime contractor for the U.S. federal government, specializing in providing pharmaceutical products, medical supplies, and related services to support healthcare programs for veterans. As a for-profit organization registered in SAM.gov since 2007" (he was convicted in 2005, so this is pretty weird, no?)

Someone posted earlier about Nick potentially having/getting access to chemicals..... Well this fella certainly seems to. Even after having an ecstasy lab.... Weird... Some MK lookin' stuff here, or perhaps a simple cult, but they seem connected, and Rekieta seems obsessed.

Also, photo 4, court docs from an old business Elite Weight Management Center, Dr Keenan had the equipment, and was making amphetamines

Phentermine, which he was making then, for "weight loss", is the same drug he's currently selling at the current "weight loss" clinic "A Better Way Health Center"

I'm still not 100% convinced Nick knows this guy.

Usually when you post a quora answer it'd be a random thing you found by googling the question, not the guy who posted it

It's possible, but i think it's far more likely it's a coincidence

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Now Nick's furry little friend claims to be in possession of Nick's surveillance footage from inside his house at the time of the alleged cumfelching episode, and he will be airing it on tonight's show going live in 70 minutes, presumably (?) with any

redacted so as to not "technically" constitute a new revenge porn offense, and presumably (!) with Nick in chat to savor the attention:

The puppet isn’t trustworthy. It’s a work.

 

[Folgers Can]

The puppet isn’t trustworthy. It’s a work.

Hence the "claims." The only real takeaways were that A) Nick will probably be in the chat to snort up every last crumb of attention he can get from said work, and B) it looks bad for such things to even be non-credibly threatened against an anticipated witness in a case that isn't actually resolved yet. "It was a prank bro" is no more a defense here than it is for the google breach case.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

We knew this time would come. Now Nick's furry little friend claims to be in possession of Nick's surveillance footage from inside his house at the time of the alleged cumfelching episode, and he will be airing it on tonight's show going live in 70 minutes, presumably (?) with any View attachment 6858971 redacted so as to not "technically" constitute a new revenge porn offense, and presumably (!) with Nick in chat to savor the attention:

View attachment 6858980
[X] [A]

I must admit that I'm not the sort of "social media expert" that could comprehend the timing of Nick's galaxygas-brained maneuvers like this. Don't you have to actually have your plea deal formally entered into the record and accepted by the judge before the appearance of witness intimidation truly ceases to be an issue?

...
It's going to be puppet "sex", isn't it?

 

[thebigdream]

...
It's going to be puppet "sex", isn't it?

It must be exhausting being a fan of these streamers. Either you believe their claims and are constantly let down when the promised content doesn't materialise, or you disbelieve everything and have to constantly watch low-effort fake nontent to own the ayylawgs.