💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.4%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.3%
  • Total voters
    696
The Mass Shooter Ron Soye said:
Is the hacking thing expected to derail his plea deal, or is it merely hype?
Click to expand...
We're going to have to wait and see. Aaron's retarded and will just say shit but he also has retard luck so law enforcement may actually be following up on the unauthorized access thing. But if it is for real it's probably going to fuck up probation for Rackets, if he hasn't already done that all on his own.
 
SaidNoOneEver said:
Ah you're right. It still seems we should be able to do simple math with those stats and derive whole numbers and not more rounding and approximation.

It's misleading to present such studies as random or evidence of anything. I haven't read it but just the quotes show the parents also testing positive at a high rate so you can't tell me this is a voluntary study where a bunch of random cocaine-using adults all volunteered to be tested with their kids.
Click to expand...
If you didn't read it, why are you criticizing it? Study papers will have a whole methodology section in which they tell you all about the data, the assumptions, the analysis, etc. You can't just go on conclusions without understanding what the conclusions are about.

The abstract was ONE paragraph. It says there were 90 kids who went to the ER in a Mediterranean city (Barcelona). Parent(s) of 85 of the 90 kids also provided hair samples (even druggies will help save their kids' lives sometimes, you know - this is not surprising).

The overlap in parent-kid coke hair was sufficiently significant that the authors recommended using testing as a window or entrance point to other social and health interventions for kids. Iow, testing can yield good potential info to identify kids with a potential variety of negative elements in their lives.

And btw, after the ONE paragraph abstract, you can see right below is another study dated 5 years later in the same city and as slightly larger sample, with about the same results. You'll also see other studies listed that relate to coke and kids there, which perhaps suggests that there is some concentrated effort specifically there to look at this an related topics. In other words, it's not just some random, sloppy bullshit study.
 
I'm sad he used Quora instead of the Yahoo Answers brain trust.

how is cocaine formed
how April get pragnent
they need to way instain Kayla > who cocaine thier babbys. because these babby can't firgth back?
 
not feeling good kiwibros... this quora site seems to be onto us

1736881223438.png
 
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
If you didn't read it, why are you criticizing it? Study papers will have a whole methodology section in which they tell you all about the data, the assumptions, the analysis, etc. You can't just go on conclusions without understanding what the conclusions are about.

The abstract was ONE paragraph. It says there were 90 kids who went to the ER in a Mediterranean city (Barcelona). Parent(s) of 85 of the 90 kids also provided hair samples (even druggies will help save their kids' lives sometimes, you know - this is not surprising).
Click to expand...
It's not a random sample; the sample is preschool children whose parents opted into a study at a single hospital which means you can't say "1 in 5 children will test positive" based on that study. It's not clear where Nick pulled the stat from but if it's that his assertion is baseless.

Since nearly 90% of the children who tested positive in the study had parents who also tested positive, it seems that they were exposed in the home as well. What I would like to see is the reverse, the probability of the child testing positive given that a parent tested positive, but that doesn't seem to be reported.

Also worth noting that the median test result for positive tests in this study was 1.6 ng/mg for children (range of 0.3-5.96) and 1.0 ng/mg for adults (range of 0.3 to 24.3).

Assuming the units for the "over 5000" test result for Nick's child was pg/mg, that is equivalent to over 5.0 ng/mg,
 
AnOminous said:
He was routinely showing up wired late at night claiming to have just been to St. Paul or wherever with increasingly bizarre and implausible reasons for going there, like to get "beef jerky."
Click to expand...
He was jerking beef alright, black beef.
 
TrainWreckWatcher said:
I used to perform cocaine smoking research for the US Government.

What an amazing line. I wonder if nick was trying to get in touch with this guy to testify.
Click to expand...
Sam Losco said:
I'm wondering if Nick's connection to this guy is deeper than a Quora answer. Someone should see if that Dr has ever said anything about substituting ADD medication with cocaine.
Click to expand...

You just know:

GuineaPig.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom