Very sorry for the late reply, but I did some reading on late Romanov Russia last year, and I read about how fascination with the occult was rampant in that part of the world back then. The books I read noted one man who was later involved in Rasputin's murder, Felix Yusupov, who was noted to both have an interest in the occult and was also a known crossdresser and homosexual. I talked to a relative who had done some studies in women's history about this a few days ago, and she told me a lot of executed witches historically were accused of being lesbians.
There is definitely a correlation between homosexuality and the occult. One must also consider the occult and human sacrifices and murder. Abomination breeds abomination.
No worries, and I agree wholeheartedly.
I am a religious man, but even without that conceit, I would like to point out this post:
Nominative determinism is entirely real and a valid way to judge a person at a glance. Not 100% accurate but generally accurate.
Not only do I agree with nominative determinism, but I also believe in
Symbolic Interactionism and it's role in the homosexual-demonic connection. I'm going to use Christianity as the baseline, but understand that this extends to several Rule of Law scenarios.
The content we consume and the people we hang around with affect our minds and mentalities. It's not necessarily that violence or sexuality themselves are perverse, no, but our own perspectives become warped by the zeitgeist.
To elaborate a little, something like Terminator 2 is an inherently violent film, but I wouldn't call it "damaging" per se, since the theme is overall hopeful. Something like Forrest Gump, which I have a vendetta against, is far more damaging since it's theme is nihilistic. This is partly a matter of personal perspective, how we interpret these films on an intrapersonal level. Indeed, if you enjoy a film like Forrest Gump, that's fine as long as you understand and reject the poisonous message. Nevertheless, when you consider both films in the context of our culture, Terminator 2 is a film about taking fate into your own hands and the necessity of morality, while Forrest Gump is about submitting to destiny and excusing lapses in morality based on that fact. Our current society dictates certain actions as "traditionally good," and others as "traditionally bad," while disregarding both's correlation with true morality. This moral obfuscation breaks Chesterton's fence into pieces. Even more so, it ignores the direct correlation with "traditionally bad," and just "bad."
"Traditionally bad" things, particularly those in Christianity, have a logical "bad" outcome. Don't steal, because then others can steal from you and property has no value. Don't lie, because it eventually comes out or haunts you forever. Don't cheat on your spouse, because it rots your relationship from the inside out and burdens your children in the long run. And, of course, don't blaspheme, because that lessens each law described in the Bible. Even if you are not Christian, the base morals here are sound and can extend to other foundational legislation.
Now, my theory as to
why homosexuals are drawn to demonic imagery
aside from being possessed by a retarded spirit is that homosexuality is a "good" perversion now, that goes against the "traditionally good." Therefore, the "traditionally good" becomes an enemy, and the "traditionally bad" becomes a friend. Demonic imagery is seen as baroque, so that's the symbology used. Of course, you could say it's solely mockery, but when it extends to names, tattoos, etc. it becomes a problem. Homosexuality becomes further entrenched within the demonic, and elements of that demonic behavior leak out into their personal lives. You rarely see a homosexual who is "just" a homosexual. They debauch themselves further in an attempt to battle the "traditionally good."
To try and summarize, our culture seeks to denigrate traditionally good morals and to subvert them with a new moral framework, while ignoring why those good traditional morals existed in the first place. Homosexuals are the zeitgeist's greatest soldiers due to their "innocent" debauchery. By embracing the demonic, they embrace many sins alongside it. It's partly mockery, yes, but I firmly believe it's more about eroding what goodness remains in the world through socially acceptable means.
TL;DR Abomination breeds abomination.
