Izdaja Slika
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 18, 2024
Candidate No 7 said: It's quite funny how they are all going "a judge ruled she is not an expert" as if you can rule on a thing like that.
Courts can and do all the time, fren
I think you are speaking about different things. monstrous bubo is right that Helen Joyce is not an expert on the Constitutionality of that amendment to Australian law. But the trans activists have taken this to mean Helen Joyce has no qualities whatsoever that would make her an authoritative voice on the intersection of trans history, and the medical, social and public policy events that have led to the current situation of trans madness, especially as it is in the UK, the Anglosphere and the rest of the world.
In any case, the support and respect for this judge's views is transactional. The judge himself is not someone who is an expert on current day trans madness, and had the judge ruled that the amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act were unConstitutional under Australian law, people like JammiDodger would not be so enamoured of the judge's, well, judgment.
It's also very maddening to hear epistemological privilege invoked. 'If you are not trans you have nothing to say about trans matters'. It's rather like saying 'unless you have killed someone, you should have nothing to say on laws about homicide'.
Also, for fuck's sake, you do not need to be a biologist or any kind of expert to recognise the internal incoherency of trans ideology. Trans ideology rules itself out of all coherence by its own contradictions.