Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
What you need to ask yourself is whether or not the judge wants things to drag on a bit longer because that's who'll have to maneuver Greer towards that end regardless of where he actually wound up.

Unlike Null, the judge is getting paid to have his time wasted. It'll come down to whether the judge actually cares about abuse of the judicial process or if he's just collecting paychecks until he can retire.
 
Unlike Null, the judge is getting paid to have his time wasted. It'll come down to whether the judge actually cares about abuse of the judicial process or if he's just collecting paychecks until he can retire.
Judges tend to have a complicated cope about this that essentially boils down to "if you are sophisticated enough to hire a lawyer you have a social/moral duty to help me humor the retard so they feel like they got justice". It's the kind of thing you can only believe if your totally detached from the reality of what a hardship legal fees are for almost everyone who has to pay them.
 
Unlike Null, the judge is getting paid to have his time wasted. It'll come down to whether the judge actually cares about abuse of the judicial process or if he's just collecting paychecks until he can retire.
Paychecks and retirement or not, no judge likes to be reversed by a higher court and basically told "you dun goofed, do it again." We're seeing an awful lot of shit-lipped tolerance from this judge because--as others have mentioned--I think he wants to make sure if/when this pile of shit Russ calls a case is tossed again, there is no chance the appellate court can issue a do-over again.
 
You can ignore the law - correctable error.

You can ignore the lawyers - who cares?

You can ignore morality - that’s not their domain.

But ignore the judge, and you’re fucked.
 
I love how neither his brother nor his dad seem particularly aware of the eight years of horrendous abuse he claims to have been through. One phone call and a promise of 40 bucks and they were like hell yeah.
 
Judges tend to have a complicated cope about this that essentially boils down to "if you are sophisticated enough to hire a lawyer you have a social/moral duty to help me humor the retard so they feel like they got justice". It's the kind of thing you can only believe if your totally detached from the reality of what a hardship legal fees are for almost everyone who has to pay them.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but since Russ is suing Josh's LLC, I believe that Null is prohibited from representing it himself in court and is forced to hire a lawyer. I'm sure that the judge would be aware of that requirement.

I love how neither his brother nor his dad seem particularly aware of the eight years of horrendous abuse he claims to have been through. One phone call and a promise of 40 bucks and they were like hell yeah.

I doubt his father would try to say anything that might hurt Russ's case and may even soften the truth or fib a bit to help his son, but I could see the brother giving zero fucks and volunteering information that would further embarrass Russ even if Hardin wasn't digging for it. I don't think Greer expected Hardin to actually contact either of his "witnesses" and that's why he freaked out the way he did and actually came to the table so quickly to make it go away even if it completely tanked his case.
 
I doubt his father would try to say anything that might hurt Russ's case and may even soften the truth or fib a bit to help his son
It all depends on how Harden would have asked his questions and the questions asked. If Elder Greer doesn't tell the truth about something like Russ being a stalking, vexatious freak, then he can be impeached by shitlip's own legal papertrail etc.
 
I have no idea if it’s the done thing in law, but like during the America’s Got Talent lawsuit*, I sure hope Hardin will include every single one of Russ’s lies in this case in his next document, as well as the lies Russ has told in other lawsuits he’s been in. Just so all the evidence as to what a vexatious litigant Russ is is in one place, and to really hammer home to the judge what a track record Russ has in bringing nonsense lawsuits pro se (costing everyone else money but himself).

* The AGT lawyer didn’t list Russ’s lies, but his past legal history of stalking and harassing women. Every. Single. One. It was glorious to have it all in one document, with references to rely on and all.
 
One of many issues that Russ has is that he knows the ingredients that go into a lawsuit, but he doesn’t have the recipe. So he uses accurate phrases (Motion to quash) but uses them inappropriately. There were no grounds to quash Hardin’s subpoenas, but Russ knew that was a thing, and figured all he had to do was file it.

It’s been like this over and over. He thinks he has the legal dagger that will end things, but then is completely mistaken on how to apply it. What‘s hilarious is how confidently wrong he is, especially when he makes impotent threats.
 
What‘s hilarious is how confidently wrong he is, especially when he makes impotent threats.
He’s yet to advance to doing anything of note even when he actually has honest-to-goodness chances to do something even if it isn’t the totality of what he wants. He squanders every single opportunity - some of which I won’t mention because he could still use them.

But this is to be expected from one track wonder here; he can’t deviate from any plan he ever comes up with because he’s a retard.

He could have BPD pussy for free for life by now if he hadn’t wasted so much time and money on whores.
 
Screenshot_20241223_170952_Firefox.jpg
Screenshot_20241223_171133_Firefox.jpg
 

Attachments

I feel like he has addressed everything (even already dismissed things) but the thing he was meant to address (that he only addressed partially)
 
The appellate court already reversed the summary judgement due to Pro Se stupidity. At this point dismissing due to pro se misconduct, bad faith and lies is the cleaner end with less possibility of reversal.
There wasn't a summary judgment, it was a dismissal under 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.
 
There wasn't a summary judgment, it was a dismissal under 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.
Which means that all the appellate court actually said is “contributory copyright infringement is a claim” and nothing else.

Which means that even they, assuming everything Russ said is 💯 true and honest, only revived that.
 
Back
Top Bottom