Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
If the judge does not impose some form of sanctions at this point I will be actually MATI.
I think we've reached the point where it would be reversible error not to take some action at this point.

The Judge however may give Hardin a stern talking to for not acting as Russ's lawyer too, and failing to correct that he neglected to label his witness list as Confidential as required by the courts standard order.

But here's the even more hilarious thing. In order for Russ to make any arguments about Hardin publishing the phone numbers (which he, Russel caused) and his family getting harassed, he will have to present his witnesses to give testimony to such. And to be deposed by the Defendants. Russ simply claiming something is not good enough. Especially when he claims to not have known his brothers address.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out with the order to show cause. The Judge appears to have set a trap for Russel. One which Hardin seems to have recognized and has played into. He's dotting his it's crossing his T's and making sure to remind the Judge in every filing what the escalating problems are.

And Russel has fallen into the Judge's trap as only a cow can.
 
View attachment 6770141

MATT HARDIN!
MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE!

MATT HARDIN!
LAWYER IN DISGUISE!
I can no longer maintain my dignified silence on this matter and must speak the truth.

The man who is known to these forums as Hardin is in fact a pokémon of the Hādin species - a hare-like creature who the defendant in this case, Joshua Lake Superior Moon, captured while holidaying in Japan. Moon has been covertly training his Hādin by pitting it against pokémon that he orders from wish.com. Because pokémon fighting is illegal in the U.S. these battles are commonly framed as legal trials. In a recent Newsweek article it was estimated that 80% of all court cases in the Untied States are really underground pokémon fights.

Naturally, as seasoned competitor, Moon's Hādin has a evolved a set of abilities far beyond what you might see in an untrained member of its species, hence Greer's bafflement.
 
Russ helpfully provided it in his filing.
View attachment 6770273

To be fair he should be sanctioned simply for including phone screenshots in his filings.
I'm nearly 100% sure that the raw image file was posted in one of the threads relating to the fundraiser, (either the fundraiser thread itself or the "Domain Registrar & Epik Seizure" thread that had the poll on whether Null should do the fundraiser) but I wasn't able to find it by highlight skimming. I'll leave hunting between the highlights for someone else.
 
He apparently was somehow under the impression that his witnesses would be HIS witnesses and he could spring them on the court (if it ever went to trial) without them being deposed.
That only works in Oregon, and not even for fed cases in Oregon.
 
This is why law school is a scam. They never told Hardin that one day, practicing the law would entail posting completely retarded emails to a court docket for 3 days straight.
 
Petition to add the following CSS to the thread (or however XenForo handles it):
CSS:
div[data-lb-id="thread-174285"] .message-userContent::after {
  content: "Sent from my iPhone";
  padding-bottom: 1em;
  display: block;
}
1734656120454.png
 
Hardin should just go all the way on seeking sanctions and dismissal. Fuck any rules of civil procedure or attempts to play ball. Those are unnecessary to sanction bad faith conduct. This is covered in any law school remedies course:

There is, therefore, nothing in the other sanctioning mechanisms or prior cases interpreting them that warrants a conclusion that federal court may not, as a matter of law, resort to its inherent power to impose attorney's fees as a sanction for bad-faith conduct. This is plainly the case where the conduct at issue is not covered by one of the other sanctioning provisions. But neither is a federal court forbidden to sanction bad-faith conduct by means of the inherent power simply because that conduct could also be sanctioned under the statute or the rules. A court must, of course, exercise caution in invoking its inherent power, and it must comply with the mandates of due process, both in determining that the requisite bad faith exists and in assessing fees, see Roadway Express, supra, at 447 U. S. 767. Furthermore, when there is bad-faith conduct in the course of litigation that could be adequately sanctioned under the rules, the court ordinarily should rely on the rules, rather than the inherent power. But if, in the informed discretion of the court, neither the statute nor the rules are up to the task, the court may safely rely on its inherent power.
Chambers v. Nasco, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 50 (1991).

Because of their very potency, inherent powers must be exercised with restraint and discretion. See Roadway Express, supra, 447 U.S. at 447 U. S. 764. A primary aspect of that discretion is the ability to fashion an appropriate sanction for conduct which abuses the judicial process. As we recognized in Roadway Express, outright dismissal of a lawsuit, which we had upheld in Link, is a particularly severe sanction, yet is within the court's discretion. 447 U.S. at 447 U. S. 765. Consequently, the "less severe sanction" of an assessment of attorney's fees is undoubtedly within a court's inherent power as well. Ibid. See also Hutto v. Finney, 437 U. S. 678, 437 U. S. 689, n. 14 (1978).
Id. at 45.

Greer's conduct goes far beyond failure to prosecute, in my opinion. It's legal subterfuge. His failure to disclose any Utah witnesses in his disclosures is fraudulent. It approaches fraud on the court. His attempts to interdict lawful depositions is evidence of the extent to which he believes he may demean the authority of the Court and its procedures. He has zero excuses at this point—his pro se excuses lost potency years ago.

The failure of the Court to deal with this degrades the authority of the judiciary. Within living memory, a district court judge would have long ago called Greer and Hardin into chambers and reamed out Greer for his failure to engage in good faith. This case is not only a waste of judicial and litigant resources, but its continued existence immensely depreciates the authority of the judiciary to resolve cases or controversies in the mind of the public. It's unremediated nonsense is a failing of the Court, not of Greer, and can only be resolved with harsh sanctions.
 
The failure of the Court to deal with this degrades the authority of the judiciary. Within living memory, a district court judge would have long ago called Greer and Hardin into chambers and reamed out Greer for his failure to engage in good faith. This case is not only a waste of judicial and litigant resources, but its continued existence immensely depreciates the authority of the judiciary to resolve cases or controversies in the mind of the public. It's unremediated nonsense is a failing of the Court, not of Greer, and can only be resolved with harsh sanctions.
I dare say that in the earlier days of our storied Republic this kind of shenanigans would get a judge tarred and feathered and the public would uphold it as a good because such behavior on behalf of the judiciary undermines the very fabric of a polite and rules based society.
 
Back
Top Bottom