Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
Honey!!! You and your boyfriend get in here, they got 'em! THEY FINALLY GOT GREER!!!
1734475948442.png
 
He's going to have the biggest meltdown of this entire saga when he sees that Hardin publicly filed the email with those phone numbers. It's going to be glorious.
All because Greer didn't use the right magic words to invoke the Standard Protective Order.
 
Am I the only one slightly horrified that he would seek to involve his family in this and subject them to deposition? Where they will be asked about his creepy antics under oath? I can't see that as going the way Russel planned?
I'm sure they're now delighted to be involved, and won't do anything they can to get out of his brothel delusions as soon as Hardin has to reach out, if it goes that far.
They are the key to proving his case, after all.
 
When this case ends eventually how does all the cost payment work. If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in? Greer has nothing right now I don't see him holding a shit job long enough to make any substantial money. Does this legal cost just hang over him for the rest of his short life?
 
Honey!!! You and your boyfriend get in here, they got 'em! THEY FINALLY GOT GREER!!!
View attachment 6763053
Ah! Well, nevertheless
When this case ends eventually how does all the cost payment work. If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in? Greer has nothing right now I don't see him holding a shit job long enough to make any substantial money. Does this legal cost just hang over him for the rest of his short life?
They can garnish his wages if he has any (and isn't working for cash under the table), or attach the judgment to any assets Greer has. Federal money judgment liens are valid for 20 years, and can be renewed for an additional 20; if it uses state law for some reason, it's 8 years +8 renewal in Utah.

Null could purchase Russ' copyrights in exchange for satisfaction of the judgment, then market them to recoup his costs.
 
This is some secret code:
"6"
"L"
"I'm 7"

What does it mean?
I ran it through my Little Orphan Annie Decoder Ring and got this:

D R I N K D R O O L M O R E O V A L T I N E

I do so hope we get to see Christmas Consequences for this fucking faggot though. Far beyond time he gets treated like an adult.
 
When this case ends eventually how does all the cost payment work. If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in? Greer has nothing right now I don't see him holding a shit job long enough to make any substantial money. Does this legal cost just hang over him for the rest of his short life?
Null could demand Greer hand over his copyrights too him in lieu of monetary compensation :unholy:
 
He'll call them good boys he was unable to retain due to circumstances beyond his control (The Plights) and the real injustice was the court let the defense have a lawyer when he wasn't allowed to.
On the other hand, it could end up as a Dennis Hof type situation, where he either loves and appreciates them or hates and blames them based on the needs of the moment.
Excellent witness list. I'm sure they'll be happy to get involved and help Russ blow the case wide open.
Imagine being personally tied to Russell Greer. It's like some sort of curse from the Bible, where God takes vengeance on the second and third generations for a transgression. Hopefully the posters here have the good taste not to contribute to these poor people's suffering by bothering them.
 
Null could demand Greer hand over his copyrights too him in lieu of monetary compensation :unholy:
I'm not sure how serious he was but Null mentioned how entertaining it could be to try and collect worldly possessions and record the process. That seems less likely now that Greer presumably had to already get rid of most of his stuff. His copyrights are generally worthless but maybe people would buy the Swift book for fun if the money doesn't go to Russ... and maybe there's some "if I did it" changes like when OJ had to hand over his copyright
On the other hand, it could end up as a Dennis Hof type situation, where he either loves and appreciates them or hates and blames them based on the needs of the moment.

Imagine being personally tied to Russell Greer. It's like some sort of curse from the Bible, where God takes vengeance on the second and third generations for a transgression. Hopefully the posters here have the good taste not to contribute to these poor people's suffering by bothering them.
and they adopted him! Not for the first time, it's proven that no good deed goes unpunished.
 
His copyrights are generally worthless
It might not be about the money so much as it is about sending a message.
maybe people would buy the Swift book for fun if the money doesn't go to Russ
Future KF fundraiser idea? I know I'd buy a hard copy of "Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy" with a foreword by Null.
 
If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in?
It’s the latter and technically the money goes to Null to use for compensation against costs.

However, many other deals can be negotiated (upfront as has been done before) and those we wouldn’t know.
 
His copyrights are generally worthless but maybe people would buy the Swift book for fun if the money doesn't go to Russ... and maybe there's some "if I did it" changes like when OJ had to hand over his copyright
If the book is signed by Null and Mr. Hardin, and has the cover be something different (image of the judgement, KF logo, Null giving the middle finger, etc), I'd buy it. I'd probably be overpaying it, but it'd be a novelty item, so I don't mind.
 
I guess I don't even understand the proposed witnesses. What could they possibly testify about in this case, even theoretically?

They have no personal knowledge of alleged infringing occurring. So they are no help proving his case. Let's say the court finds contributory copyright infringement. The plaintiff ideally needs a damages expert to assess the potential lost revenue caused by the naughty poasters (something he seemingly has waived with his latest disclosure). Hurt feelings or psychological distress from copyright infringement can't be compensated- its not a IIED case (which I think was in the original complaint).

So even if get past the fact the Rule 26 disclosure is late and completely inadequate- shouldn't the witnesses be excluded for total lack of relevance?
 
Back
Top Bottom