- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
If most normies agree then why is it perfectly legal to have sex with 16 year olds in most of the developed world?most normies agree that attaction to 16-17yo is pedophilia.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If most normies agree then why is it perfectly legal to have sex with 16 year olds in most of the developed world?most normies agree that attaction to 16-17yo is pedophilia.
Legality =/= socially acceptable.If most normies agree then why is it perfectly legal to have sex with 16 year olds in most of the developed world?
AoC discourse is the most terminally online autistic shit in existence tbh.If most normies agree then why is it perfectly legal to have sex with 16 year olds in most of the developed world?
No, normies will call you a pedo for fucking little children, not for being a creepy manslut who fucks legal adults. Normal human beings still think "pedophile" just means somebody who fucks little children because they're out of touch and not online enough to realise it actually means "everyone I don't like on the internet".However, that doesn't matter to normies, they will call you a pedo.
They wont if there is literally no evidence other than an anonymous leakers hearsay, but hey, Ill stop beating this dead horse.he allegedly just got caught sexting a minor, people will care.
Its over boysNot sure why anyone would say this publicly.
"normal human beings" aren't the people watching streamers or political content in youtube.No, normies will call you a pedo for fucking little children, not for being a creepy manslut who fucks legal adults. Normal human beings still think "pedophile" just means somebody who fucks little children because they're out of touch and not online enough to realise it actually means "everyone I don't like on the internet".
fyi, it's normal etiquette in the farms to not double post (not making two posts next to each other without waiting for another person write something before you). So if you are going to respond to other things edit your original post and add the rest of the things you want to say there.Its over boys
Aella's reaction at the end sums it wellNot sure why anyone would say this publicly.
Doesn't matter if it makes its way to the article or not. That will catch the interest of the journos who reads the original allegations, which makes it far more likely tha the rest of the claims that ACTUALLY have evidence will actually end up written in an article. It's common sense.They wont if there is literally no evidence other than an anonymous leakers hearsay, but hey, Ill stop beating this dead horse.
"Normies" as in people who are online and consume political content
You are actually retarded. "Retarded", as in, I think you have a legitimate intellectual disability."Pedophile" as in slutty streamer who has sex with adults and I don't like him.
The 8 videos of him sucking dick weren't enough to convince you?Its over boys
If she wasn't selling content I would agree with you.
Yeah, on Twitter. You think using Twitter instead of a platform with age verification makes someone less likely to be underage? Retardshe was very publicly selling nude content, I would assume anyone doing so was of age
All I know is that I have you ignored, which usually means that I only do for people who defend Tiny often, so that already told me from the start that a conversation with you is pointless.You are actually retarded. "Retarded", as in, I think you have a legitimate intellectual disability.
He was the one who leaked it? Wasn't it Lauren's husband?ETA: Tiny shared Lauren Southerns personal account of being allegedly assaulted by Andrew Tate. Tiny cares for no one’s privacy.
Yeah, on Twitter. You think using Twitter instead of a platform with age verification makes someone less likely to be underage? Retard
I don't care what his left wing audience thinks of it, this is a gossip forum for Kiwi Farms users, not a shady backroom to plot somebody's demise, and if people here start calling him a pedophile for having sex with a 19 year old it will make us all look retarded.All I know is that I have you ignored, which usually means that I only do for people who defend Tiny often, so that already told me from the start that a conversation with you is pointless.
Again, my metaphor is sound, and Rose wasn't an adult. Destiny has had controversies in his communities regarding his chat being sexual with minors (ask Pippa, it's his favorite topic) and he allowed it to happen.
I will say it again, you are out of touch, and have no idea what the average left wing audience would consider of Destiny's actions regarding minors. What KF thinks, what right wingers think, what it's legal or not, is COMPLETELY irrelevant. That doesn't affect Tiny, however, what the average left wing normie would interpret of his actions does affect him, and would basically made him impossible to ever reach mainstream.
Steven-wonderful, trustworthy man that he is- leaked dms of Lauren saying she had been assaulted to the girl he had no idea what age she was and had never met in person. When that leak was made known on here that led to gossip queen rollo posting the husband's (questionable) version of events on twitter.He was the one who leaked it? Wasn't it Lauren's husband?
Can you point me to the posts calling him a pedophile for having sex with a 19 year old? I must have missed those ones.and if people here start calling him a pedophile for having sex with a 19 year old it will make us all look retarded.