So with that in mind, I'd like to focus on -- I think the government adduced ample evidence that the defendant has child pornography on his phone. That is obviously a very serious charge, with great implications for the victims who are exploited for child pornography. And particularly in light of the additional grooming activities that the government brought to light through Officer -- Agent Miller's testimony and his proximity to the school, not only his physical proximity but his -- the selfie that was described with the school in the background -- his self-described status as a groomer; and that he has apparently not just self-described himself as a groomer, but he's taken actions in furtherance of that, referring to the complaint prior this year where he seems to have engaged in a chat where he had a picture of his genitals exposed to somebody who identified to him as a minor.