💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    698
This Post Is Satire said:
Has it ever been revealed what type of cocaine metabolites were present in the hair sample, or is it nondescript? Can someone provide a link to whatever report is available? Without showing my hand, I have some expertise in this field.

Cocaine has at least 1 metabolite that can feasibly spontaneously hydrolyze in the presence of water (primarily the benzoyl metabolite). Other cocaine metabolite pathways necessitate some kind of enzymatic process to form.

View attachment 6688637

The benzoyl metabolite wouldn't likely be formed in any meaningful quantities in regular water however, and the formation would likely be a very slow process.
ALTERNATIVELY, the benzoyl metabolite can be formed in large quantities by alkaline hydrolysis, such as could be encountered from freebasing.
So in short, without further information, I would expect that either cocaine was ingested or there was exposure (by physical contact or otherwise) to crack, which is degenerate and pathetic on an entirely different level.
Click to expand...
So in order to push the "cops dropped cocaine on my daughter's hair" narrative, he would need to first confess it was actually crack cocaine?
 
Mouse Cop said:
Possibly his last Xeet of the night? Stay tuned. Archive
View attachment 6687903
Click to expand...
"I changed. People accused me of lying, but I just changed." - Rekieta Nov 25th

When the evidence of his lies is insurmountable, he just moves the goalpost.

On February 6th, when April was probably still his "girlfriend", he said:
0:25: "I know people perceive differences but to me, internally, I'm not different how I think about things. Sure, I may be different how I execute things how I talk I do a show [...]"

He once stood for many principles that normal people see as core values in life:
Monogamy, loyalty to your spouse, faithfulness to your religion, defending freedom of expression even when it's against you...

The lengths he goes to avoid admitting he wasn't truthful (aka HE LIED) to those principles is astounding.
But at the same time, it's not surprising...
1730092082167.png
His principles are extensions of his courtesy. According to him, a principle doesn't reflect an idea bigger than oneself; it's just a tool for personal benefit.

His words and principles are meaningless, serving only his self-fulfillment and vanity. They will never stand for anything bigger. What a cuck.
 
JT Marlin said:
He's going to plea and get a good deal. If offered that, he'll take it. He's a narcissist but he's not insane. He has a sense of self-preservation, even if it warped beyond social norms.

I expect a grandiose rant and continued denials afterwards.
Click to expand...
I can see it now, he pleas guilty and then starts streaming.

“Silly Kiwinerds, the government never PROVED the coke was mine. I HAD to plead guilty otherwise the government would’ve taken me away from my kids.”
 
Melty Butter said:
He's about to plea.
Nick's gonna fight.
leaning into Nick pleading guilty
Click to expand...
I don't want a normal, orderly plea.
I want courtroom fireworks.
testify.png

"ᴳᵒᵈ ʰᵉˡᵖ ᵐᵉ..."
- "I'm sorry, Mr. Rekieta, I couldn't hear you. What did you say?"
"I said, 'god help me.'"
- "Yes, well, however... is it your opinion—?"
"It's my opinion Aaron did not wear that balldo."
- "Excuse me, Mr. Rekieta?"
"He fed my kids Spaghetti-Os. That's what—"
- "Could you speak louder, Mr. Rekieta?"
"Aaron Imholte did not wear the balldo. Because I wore the balldo."
[audience gasps]
"I wore the balldo... I wore the balldo with my Minnesota 7."
- "Mr. Rekieta, on the nights before attending Hedonism 2—"
"In July, August, and September of 2022, I wore the balldo."
- "On the morning of the arrest—?"
"I was wearing it. I'm wearing it right now. I'm wearing it now, because... I'm a lolbert.""
 
Goku 1000000 O said:
I can see it now, he pleas guilty and then starts streaming.

“Silly Kiwinerds, the government never PROVED the coke was mine. I HAD to plead guilty otherwise the government would’ve taken me away from my kids.”
Click to expand...
Exactly this with more impotent rage. His ego will be badly bruised for having to bow his head to the eeeevilll gobermint.
 
daffodils said:
What does it say about the overall Rekieta strategy that Kayla is still challenging the warrant? A warrant that most lawyers not named Nick Rekieta seem to consider solid?
Click to expand...
Everyone does it. It's going to fail, obviously. Her lawyer tries to get creative a few times. Fairly sure Nick was swatted way before the Aaron fallout and before he even met Aaron. Anyone got the timeline on that? Such a thing can be useful with some other more solid facts to work with, but they don't create a timeline to match it.

Gonna fail on the mandatory reporter also. Judge watched the video in all its glory, so that also gonna fail.

The state will just destroy it.

It would be hilarious if his wife gets off on it and he is found guilty though, so I'm not sure what I'm wishing for 😀
 
1732632550213.png

Kayla's literally going with the strategy that Nick is an actor, and you could investigate Al Pacino for Scarface if you can investigate the live-streamer. It could have been drywall powder on Nick's nose...

I'm going to guess that the judge will see a difference between someone who is acting like a practicing lawyer and someone who is literally an actor purposefully portraying a character using drugs. The fact that Al Pacino isn't called Al Pacino during the movie is a pretty big tell that he's not portraying himself. Being on coke was never part of Nick's public persona, the detective watched enough of Nick's show to know that, and to know that Nick claimed he was portraying his actual character and not adopting one for the purposes of the stream. I don't see any reason to conclude that Pomplum misrepresented anything.
 
ShinyStar said:
View attachment 6688741
Kayla's literally going with the strategy that Nick is an actor, and you could investigate Al Pacino for Scarface if you can investigate the live-streamer. It could have been drywall powder on Nick's nose...

I'm going to guess that the judge will see a difference between someone who is acting like a practicing lawyer and someone who is literally an actor purposefully portraying a character using drugs. The fact that Al Pacino isn't called Al Pacino during the movie is a pretty big tell that he's not portraying himself. Being on coke was never part of Nick's public persona, the detective watched enough of Nick's show to know that, and to know that Nick claimed he was portraying his actual character and not adopting one for the purposes of the stream. I don't see any reason to conclude that Pomplum misrepresented anything.
Click to expand...
The actual cocaine they found in Nick's house was just because he's a method actor
 
ShinyStar said:
View attachment 6688741
Kayla's literally going with the strategy that Nick is an actor, and you could investigate Al Pacino for Scarface if you can investigate the live-streamer. It could have been drywall powder on Nick's nose...

I'm going to guess that the judge will see a difference between someone who is acting like a practicing lawyer and someone who is literally an actor purposefully portraying a character using drugs. The fact that Al Pacino isn't called Al Pacino during the movie is a pretty big tell that he's not portraying himself. Being on coke was never part of Nick's public persona, the detective watched enough of Nick's show to know that, and to know that Nick claimed he was portraying his actual character and not adopting one for the purposes of the stream. I don't see any reason to conclude that Pomplum misrepresented anything.
Click to expand...
This argument is insane, might as well just save time and tell the judge you did it.

Even if they investigated Al Pacino, it wouldn't matter, because Al Pacino (to my knowledge) wasn't actually doing a mountain of blow.
 
Not Even Twice said:
Also I see April's little period of being nice and loving to Aaron is over, someone must have convinced her that she can't be held accountable for the supposed hack/info breach.
Click to expand...

April's Twitter activity is cyclic.

(1) Overconfident, suggestive, pompous posting when she perceives Aaron's downfall is imminent/when Nick feeds her false optimism.

(2) When her wishes/Nick's promises don't materialize and she gets pushback for being a retard, she adopts the shy, ditzy eat, pray, love damsel character and gradually slithers back into her offline hole.

(3) Rinse, repeat
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom